AN INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENTIALS AND THE ROLE OF SENTIMENT IN POLITICAL COMMUNICATION ON TWITTER DURING ELECTION PERIODS

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 795-825

  Dang Xuan, Linh ^a   Stieglitz, Stefan ^a   Wladarsch, Jennifer ^b   Neuberger, Christoph ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MÜNSTER   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

election campaign; influentials; political communication; sentiment; Twitter

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878780199     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2013.783608     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Akkaya, C., Wiebe, J. & Mihalcea, R. (2009) 'Subjectivity word sense disambiguation', in Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Singapore, 6-7 August 2009, pp. 190-199.
2. Ammann, S. L. (2010) Why Do They Tweet? The Use of Twitter by U.S. Senate Candidates in 2010, [Online] Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1725477 (1 December 2012).
3. Aral, S., Muchnik, L. & Sundararajan, A. (2009) 'Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks', Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 106, pp. 21544-21549.
4. Bakshy, E., Hofman, J., Mason, W. & Watts, D. (2011) 'Everyone's an influencer: quantifying influence on twitter', in Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, 2011, Hong Kong, China, 9-12 February 2011.
5. Bayer, M., Sommer, W. and Schacht, A. 2012. Font size matters - emotion and attention in cortical responses to written words. PLOS ONE, 7 (5, e36042) (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036042)
6. Berger, J. 2011. Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22 (7): 891 - 893. (doi:10.1177/0956797611413294)
7. Berger, J. and Milkman, K. 2012. What makes online content viral?. Journal of Marketing Research, 49: 192 - 205. (doi:10.1509/jmr.10.0353)
8. Bollen, J., Pepe, A. & Mao, H. (2011) 'Modeling public mood and emotion: Twitter sentiment and socio-economic phenomena', in Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 17-21 July 2011, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 450-453.
9. Bruns, A. and Stieglitz, S. 2012. Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30 (3 & 4): 160 - 185. (doi:10.1080/15228835.2012.744249)
10. Cameron, A. C. and Trivedi, P. K. 1998. Regression Analysis of Count Data, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
11. Cha, M., Haddadi, H., Benevenuto, F. & Gummad, K. P. (2010) 'Measuring user influence on Twitter: the million follower fallacy', in Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 23-26 May 2010, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 10-17.
12. Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Gonalves, B., Flammini, A. & Menczer, F. (2011) 'Political polarization on twitter', in Proceedings of the 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 17-21 July 2011, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 89-96.
13. Domingos, P. & Richardson, M. (2001) 'Mining the network value of customers', in Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, 26-29 August 2001, pp. 57-66.
14. Facebook (2013) Facebook Key Facts, [Online] Available at: http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts (13 February 2013).
15. Farrell, H. and Drezner, D. 2008. The power and politics of blogs. Public Choice, 134 (1): 15 - 30. (doi:10.1007/s11127-007-9198-1)
16. Gaffney, D. (2010) '#iranElection: quantifying online activism', Paper presented at the 2nd WebScience Conference, Raleigh, NC, USA, 2010.
17. Gladwell, M. 2000. The Tipping Point: How Little Things Can Make a Big Difference, New York: Little Brown.
18. Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M. and Rogers, A. 2010. Twitter use by the U.S. congress. Journal of the American Society for Information and Technology, 61 (8): 1612 - 1621.
19. Harris, R. B. and Paradice, D. 2007. An investigation of the computer-mediated communication of emotion. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3: 2081 - 2090.
20. Heath, C. 1996. Do people prefer to pass along good news or bad news? Valence and relevance of news as a predictor of transmission propensity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68: 79 - 94. (doi:10.1006/obhd.1996.0091)
21. Holsti, O. R. 1969. Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanitities, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
22. Honeycutt, C. & Herring, S. C. (2009) 'Beyond microblogging: conversation and collaboration via twitter', in Proceedings of the 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 5-8 January 2009, pp. 1-10.
23. Hong, S. & Nadler, D. (2011) 'Does the early bird move the polls? The use of the social media tool "Twitter" by U.S. politicians and its impact on public opinion', in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Digital Government Research, College Park, MD, 12-15 June 2011, pp. 182-186.
24. Huffaker, D. 2010. Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communication Research, 36 (4): 593 - 617. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01390.x)
25. Jansen, H. J. and Koop, R. 2005. Pundits, ideologues, and ranters: the British Columbia election online. Canadian Journal of Communication, 30: 613 - 632.
26. Joyce, E. and Kraut, R. 2006. Predicting continued participation in newsgroups. Journal of Computer-mediated Communication, 11 (3): 723 - 747. (doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00033.x)
27. Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. 1955. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications, New York: The Free Press.
28. Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Peyk, P. and Junghöfer, M. 2007. Buzzwords: early cortical responses to emotional words during reading. Psychological Science, 18: 475 - 480. (doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01924.x)
29. Krippendorff, K. 2004. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
30. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H. & Moon, S. (2010) 'What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?', in Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, Raleigh, NC, 26-30 April 2010, pp. 591-600.
31. Larsson, A. and Moe, H. 2012. Studying political microblogging. Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media & Society, 14 (5): 729 - 747. (doi:10.1177/1461444811422894)
32. Lassen, D. S. and Brown, A. R. 2011. Twitter: the electoral connection?. Social Science Computer Review, 29 (4): 419 - 436. (doi:10.1177/0894439310382749)
33. Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, H. and Gaudet, H. 1948. The People's Choice. How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, New York: Columbia University Press.
34. Liu, B. 2011. Web Data Mining: Exploring Hyperlinks, Contents, and Usage Data, Heidelberg: Springer.
35. Luminet, O., Bouts, P., Delie, F., Manstead, A. S. R. and Rimé, B. 2000. Social sharing of emotion following exposure to a negatively valenced situation. Cognition & Emotion, 14: 661 - 688. (doi:10.1080/02699930050117666)
36. Nagarajan, M., Purohit, H. & Sheth, A. (2010) 'A qualitative examination of topical tweet and retweet practices', in Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 23-26 May 2010, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 295-298.
37. O'Connor, B., Balasubbramanyan, R., Routledge, B. & Smith, N. (2010) 'From tweets to polls: linking text sentiment to public opinion time series', in Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 23-26 May 2010, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 122-129.
38. Paltoglou, G. & Thelwall, M. (2010) 'A study of information retrieval weighting schemes for sentiment analysis', in Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala, Sweden, 11-16 July 2010, pp. 1386-1395.
39. Pang, B. and Lee, L. 2008. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Foundations and Trends in Information Retrieval, 1 (1-2): 1 - 135. (doi:10.1561/1500000011)
40. Peters, K., Kashima, Y. and Clark, A. 2009. Talking about others: emotionality and the dissemination of social information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39: 207 - 222. (doi:10.1002/ejsp.523)
41. Rainie, L., Smith, A., Lehman Schlozman, K., Brady, H. & Verba, S. (2012) 'Social media and political engagement', Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington DC. [Online] Available at: http://pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_SocialMediaAndPoliticalEngagement_PDF.pdf (20 January 2013).
42. Rimé, B. 2009. Emotion elicits the social sharing of emotion: theory and empirical review. Emotion Review, 1: 60 - 85. (doi:10.1177/1754073908097189)
43. Riordan, M. and Kreuz, R. 2010. Emotion encoding and interpretation in computer-mediated commu-nication: reasons for use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26: 1667 - 1673. (doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.015)
44. Rogers, E. M. 1962. Diffusion of Innovations, New York: The Free Press.
45. Romero, D., Meeder, B. & Kleinbeg, J. (2011) 'Differences in the mechanics of information diffusion across topics: idioms, political hashtags, and complex contagion on Twitter', in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India, 28 March-1 April, 2011, pp. 695-704.
46. Schenk, M. 2007. Medienwirkungsforschung, Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
47. Schenk, M., Jers, C. and Tschörtner, A. 2009. " Wer ist Meinungsführer? - zur Differenzierung des Meinungsführerkonzeptes ". In Kommunikationswissenschaft. Medienrealitäten, Edited by: Dahinden, U. and Süss, D. 187 - 200. UVK, Konstanz.
48. Smith, S. M. and Petty, R. E. 1996. Message framing and persuasion: a message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22 (3): 257 - 268. (doi:10.1177/0146167296223004)
49. Stieglitz, S. & Dang-Xuan, L. (2012a) 'Impact and Diffusion of Sentiment in Public Communication on Facebook', in Proceedings of 20th European Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona, Spain, 10-13 June 2012, Paper 98.
50. Stieglitz, S. and Dang-Xuan, L. 2012b. Social media and political communication - a social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining, Online First, doi: 10.1007/s13278-012-0079-3
51. Stieglitz, S. and Kaufhold, C. 2011. Automatic full text analysis in public social media - adoption of a software prototype to investigate political communication. Procedia Computer Science, 5: 776 - 781. (doi:10.1016/j.procs.2011.07.104)
52. Suh, B., Hong, L., Pirolli, P. & Chi, E. (2010) 'Want to be retweeted? Large scale analytics on factors impacting retweet in twitter network', in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, pp. 177-184.
53. Techcrunch (2012) Twitter May Have 500M+ Users But Only 170M Are Active, 75% On Twitter's Own Clients. [Online] Available at: http://techcrunch.com/2012/07/31/twitter-may-have-500m-users-but-only-170m-are-active-75-on-twittersown-Clients (15 January 2013).
54. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K., Paltoglou, G., Cai, D. and Kappas, A. 2010. Sentiment strength detection in short informal text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 6 (12): 2544 - 2558. (doi:10.1002/asi.21416)
55. Thelwall, M., Buckley, K. and Paltoglou, G. 2011. Sentiment in Twitter events. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62 (2): 406 - 418. (doi:10.1002/asi.21462)
56. Thimm, C., Einspänner, J. and Dang-Anh, M. 2012. Twitter als Wahlkampfmedium. Modellierung und Analyse politischer Social-Media-Nutzung. Publizistik, 57 (3): 293 - 313. (doi:10.1007/s11616-012-0156-7)
57. Tumasjan, A., Sprenger, T., Sandner, P. and Welpe, L. 2011. Election forecasts with Twitter: how 140 characters reflect the political landscape. Social Science Computer Review, 29 (4): 402 - 418. (doi:10.1177/0894439310386557)
58. Walther, J. B. and D'Addario, K. P. 2001. The impacts of emotions on message interpretation in com-puter-mediated communication. Social Science Computer Review, 19: 324 - 347. (doi:10.1177/089443930101900307)
59. Wattal, S., Schuff, D., Mandviwalla, M. and Williams, C. 2010. Web 2.0 and politics: the 2008 U.S. presidential election and an e-politics research agenda. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 34 (4): 669 - 688.
60. Watts, D. and Dodds, P. 2007. Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34 (4): 441 - 458. (doi:10.1086/518527)
61. Weng, J., Lim, E. P., Jiang, J. & He, Q. (2010) 'TwitterRank: finding topic-sensitive influential twitterers', in Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, New York City, NY, 3-6 February 2010, pp. 261-270.
62. Yang, J. & Counts, S. (2010) 'Predicting the speed, scale, and range of information diffusion in twitter', in Proceedings of the 4th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Washington, DC, 23-26 May 2010, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 355-358.
63. Yardi, S. and boyd, d. 2010. Dynamic debates: an analysis of group polarization over time on twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 20: 1 - 8.