Subjectivity word sense disambiguation

EMNLP 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of ACL, Held in Conjunction with ACL-IJCNLP 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 190-199

  Akkaya, Cem ^a   Wiebe, Janyce ^a   Mihalcea, Rada ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS;

WORD SENSE DISAMBIGUATION;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 78149307910     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1699510.1699535     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. A. Andreevskaia and S. Bergler. 2006. Mining wordnet for a fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from wordnet glosses. In (EACL-2006).
2. K. Bloom, N. Garg, and S. Argamon. 2007. Extracting appraisal expressions. In HLT-NAACL 2007, pages 308-315, Rochester, NY.
3. T. G. Dietterich. 1998. Approximate statistical tests for comparing supervised classification learning algorithms. Neural Computation, 10:1895-1923.
4. A. Esuli and F. Sebastiani. 2006. SentiWordNet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In (LREC-06), Genova, IT.
5. E. Hovy, M. Marcus, M. Palmer, L. Ramshaw, and R. Weischedel. 2006. Ontonotes: The 90% solution. In Proceedings of the Human Language Technology Conference of the NAACL, Companion Volume: Short Papers, New York City.
6. A. Kilgarriff and M. Palmer, editors. 2000. Computer and the Humanities. Special issue: SENSEVAL. Evaluating Word Sense Disambiguation programs, volume 34, April.
7. S.-M. Kim and E. Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In (COLING 2004), pages 1267-1373, Geneva, Switzerland.
8. S.-M. Kim and E. Hovy. 2006. Identifying and analyzing judgment opinions. In (HLT/NAACL-06), pages 200-207, New York, New York.
9. R. Mihalcea and P. Edmonds, editors. 2004. Proceedings of SENSEVAL-3, Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop, Barcelona, Spain.
10. R. Mihalcea. 2002. Instance based learning with automatic feature selection applied to Word Sense Disambiguation. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2002), Taipei, Taiwan, August.
11. R. Navigli. 2006. Meaningful clustering of senses helps boost word sense disambiguation performance. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
12. M. Palmer, O. Babko-Malaya, and H. T. Dang. 2004. Different sense granularities for different applications. In HLT-NAACL 2004 Workshop: 2nd Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding, Boston, Massachusetts.
13. B. Pang and L. Lee. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarizationbased on minimum cuts. In (ACL-04), pages 271-278, Barcelona, ES. Association for Computational Linguistics.
14. J. Preiss and D. Yarowsky, editors. 2001. Proceedings of SENSEVAL-2, Association for Computational Linguistics Workshop, Toulouse, France.
15. R. Quirk, S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Longman, New York.
16. E. Riloff and J. Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In (EMNLP-2003), pages 105-112, Sapporo, Japan.
17. R. E. Schapire and Y. Singer. 2000. BoosTexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learning, 39(2/3):135-168.
18. R. Snow, S. Prakash, D. Jurafsky, and A. Ng. 2007. Learning to merge word senses. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL), Prague, Czech Republic.
19. F. Su and K. Markert. 2008. From word to sense: a case study of subjectivity recognition. In (COLING-2008), Manchester.
20. P. Turney. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002), pages 417-424, Philadelphia.
21. C. Whitelaw, N. Garg, and S. Argamon. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of CIKM-05, the ACM SIGIR Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Bremen, DE.
22. J. Wiebe and R. Mihalcea. 2006. Word sense and subjectivity. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Sydney, Australia.
23. J. Wiebe, T. Wilson, and C. Cardie. 2005. Annotating expressions of opinions and emotions in language. Language Resources and Evaluation (formerly Computers and the Humanities), 39(2/3):164-210.
24. T. Wilson, J. Wiebe, and P. Hoffmann. 2005a. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In (HLT/EMNLP-2005), pages 347-354, Vancouver, Canada.
25. T.Wilson, P. Hoffmann, S. Somasundaran, J. Kessler, J. Wiebe, Y. Choi, C. Cardie, E. Riloff, and S. Patwardhan. 2005b. OpinionFinder: A system for subjectivity analysis. In Proc. Human Language Technology Conference and Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP-2005) Companion Volume (software demonstration).
26. T. Wilson. 2008. Fine-grained Subjectivity and Sentiment Analysis: Recognizing the Intensity, Polarity, and Attitudes of private states. Ph.D. thesis, Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh.
27. I. Witten and E. Frank. 2005. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, Second Edition. Morgan Kaufmann, June.
28. H. Yu and V. Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-03), pages 129-136, Sapporo, Japan.