Perceived, not actual, similarity predicts initial attraction in a live romantic context: Evidence from the speed-dating paradigm

Personal Relationships

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 199-215

  Tidwell, Natasha D ^a   Eastwick, Paul W ^a   Finkel, Eli J ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878776134     PISSN: 13504126     EISSN: 14756811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2012.01405.x     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Acitelli, L. K., Douvan, E., & Veroff, J. (1993). Perceptions of conflict in the first year of marriage: How important are similarity and understanding? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 5-19.
2. Albright, L., Kenny, D. A., & Malloy, T. E. (1988). Consensus in personality judgments at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 387-395.
3. Ambady, N., Krabbenhoft, M. A., & Hogan, D. (2006). The 30-sec sale: Using thin slice judgments to evaluate sales effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16, 4-13.
4. Ambady, N., & Rosenthal, R. (1993). Half a minute: Predicting teacher evaluations from thin slices of nonverbal behavior and physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 431-441.
5. Borkenau, P., & Liebler, A. (1992). Trait inferences: Sources of validity at zero acquaintance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 645-657.
6. Byrne, D. (1961). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 713-715.
7. Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm New York, NY: Academic Press.
8. Byrne, D., Ervin, C., & Lamberth, J. (1970). Continuity between the experimental study of attraction and real-life computer dating. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 157-165.
9. Condon, J. W., & Crano, W. D. (1988). Inferred evaluation and the relation between attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 789-797.
10. Critcher, C. R., & Dunning, D. (2009). How chronic self-views influence (and mislead) self-assessments of performance: Self-views shape bottom-up experiences with the task. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 931-945.
11. Curran, J. P., & Lippold, S. (1975). The effects of physical attraction and attitude similarity on attraction in dating dyads. Journal of Personality, 43, 528-539.
12. Dabbs, J., & Bernieri, F. J. (1999). Judging personality from thin slices. Unpublished data, University of Toledo.
13. Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18, 192-203.
14. Duck, S. W., & Craig, G. (1975). Effects of type of information upon interpersonal attraction. Social Behavior and Personality, 3, 157-164.
15. Eastwick, P. W., & Finkel, E. J. (2008). Speed-dating as a methodological innovation. The Psychologist, 21, 402-403.
16. Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2011). When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 1012-1032.
17. Eastwick, P. W., Finkel, E. J., Mochon, D., & Ariely, D. (2007). Selective versus unselective romantic desire: Not all reciprocity is created equal. Psychological Science, 18, 317-319.
18. Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1964). An improved short questionnaire for the measurement of extraversion and neuroticism. Life Sciences, 305, 1103-1109.
19. Feeney, J. A. (2002). Attachment, marital interaction, and relationship satisfaction: A diary study. Personal Relationships, 9, 39-55.
20. Finkel, E. J., & Eastwick, P. W. (2008). Speed-dating. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 193-197.
21. Finkel, E. J., Eastwick, P. W., & Matthews, J. (2007). Speed-dating as an invaluable tool for studying initial romantic attraction: A methodological primer. Personal Relationships, 14, 149-166.
22. Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: Evidence from a speed dating experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 673-697.
23. Gangestad, S. W., Simpson, J. A., DiGeronimo, K., & Biek, M. (1992). Differential accuracy in person perception across traits: Examination of a functional hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 688-698.
24. Gaunt, R. (2006). Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: Are similar spouses happier? Journal of Personality, 74, 1401-1420.
25. Glass, G., & Stanley, J. (1970). Statistical methods in education and psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26. Griffin, D., Murray, S., & Gonzalez, R. (1999). Difference score correlations in relationship research: A conceptual primer. Personal Relationships, 6, 505-518.
27. Houser, M. L., Horan, S. M., & Furler, L. A. (2007). Predicting relational outcomes: An investigation of thin slice judgments in speed dating. Human Communication, 10, 69-81.
28. Houser, M. L., Horan, S. M., & Furler, L. A. (2008). Dating in the fast lane: How communication predicts speed-dating success. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 749-768.
29. Hoyle, R. H. (1993). Interpersonal attraction in the absence of explicit attitudinal information. Social Cognition, 11, 309-320.
30. Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1995). Assessing longitudinal change in marriage: An introduction to the analysis of growth curves. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57, 1091-1108.
31. Kenny, D. A. (1994). Interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
32. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York, NY: Guilford.
33. Kleck, R. E., & Rubenstein, C. (1975). Physical attractiveness, perceived attitude similarity, and interpersonal attraction in an opposite sex encounter. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 107-114.
34. Klohnen, E. C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive-Self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity, or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709-722.
35. Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). Hurrydate: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227-244.
36. Levesque, M. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1993). Accuracy of behavioral predictions at zero acquaintance: A social relations analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 1178-1187.
37. Levinger, G. (1972). Little sand box and big quarry: Comment on Byrne's paradigmatic spade for research on interpersonal attraction. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 3, 3-19.
38. Levinger, G., & Breedlove, J. (1966). Interpersonal attraction and agreement: A study of marriage partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 367-372.
39. Luo, S., Chen, H., Yue, G., Zhang, G., Zhaoyang, R., & Xu, D. (2008). Predicting marital satisfaction from self, partner, and couple characteristics: Is it me, you, or us? Journal of Personality, 76, 1231-1266.
40. Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and martial quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 304-326.
41. Luo, S., & Zhang, G. (2009). What leads to romantic attraction: Similarity, reciprocity, security, or beauty? Evidence from a speed-dating study. Journal of Personality, 77, 933-964.
42. Michinov, E., & Monteil, J. (2002). The similarity-attraction relationship revisited: Divergence between the affective and behavioral facets of attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 485-500.
43. Montoya, R. M., & Horton, R. (2004). The importance of overall evaluation as a determinant of interpersonal attraction in the similarity effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 696-712.
44. Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 25, 889-923.
45. Morry, M. M. (2005). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of similarity ratings: A test of the attraction-similarity hypothesis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22, 561-584.
46. Morry, M. M. (2007). Relationship satisfaction as a predictor of perceived similarity across cross-sex friends: A test of the attraction-similarity model. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 117-138.
47. Murstein, B. I., & Beck, G. D. (1972). Person perception, marriage adjustment, and social desirability. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 39, 396-403.
48. Nudd, R. T. (1965). Satisfied and dissatisfied college roommates. Journal of College Student Personnel, 32, 161-164.
49. Orpen, C. (1984). Attitude similarity, attraction, and decision making in the employment interview. Journal of Psychology, 117, 111-121.
50. Place, S. S., Todd, P. M., Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2009). The ability to judge the romantic interest of others. Psychological Science, 20, 22-26.
51. Prickett, J. T., Gada-Jain, N., & Bernieri, F. J. (2000, May). The importance of first impressions in a job interview Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.
52. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53. Rule, N., & Ambady, N. (2008). The face of success: Inferences from chief executive officers' appearance predict company profits. Psychological Science, 19, 109-111.
54. Rule, N., & Ambady, N. (2009). She's got the look: Inferences from female chief executive officers' faces predict their success. Sex Roles, 61, 644-652.
55. Rule, N. O., & Ambady, N. (2010). Democrats and Republicans can be differentiated from their faces. PLoS ONE, 5, e8733. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008 733
56. Schmitt, D. P., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Big Five traits related to short-term mating: From personality to promiscuity across 46 nations. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 246-282.
57. Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6, 870-883.
58. Sunnafrank, M. (1985). Attitude similarity and interpersonal attraction during early communicative relationships: A research note on the generalizability of findings to opposite-sex relationships. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 49, 73-80.
59. Sunnafrank, M. (1992). On debunking the attitude similarity myth. Communication Monographs, 59, 164-179.
60. Sunnafrank, M. J. (1991). Interpersonal attraction and attitude similarity: A communication-based assessment. Communication Yearbook, 14, 451-490.
61. Sunnafrank, M. J., & Miller, G. R. (1981). The role of initial conversations in determining attraction to similar and dissimilar strangers. Human Communication Research, 8, 16-25.
62. Thompson, A., & Bolger, N. (1999). Emotional transmission in couples under stress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 38-48.
63. Todd, P. M., Penke, L., Fasolo, B., & Lenton, A. P. (2007). Different cognitive processes underlie human mate choices and mate preferences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15011-15016.
64. Waldron, V. R., & Applegate, J. L. (1998). Similarity in the use of person-centered tactics: Effects on social attraction and persuasiveness in dyadic verbal disagreements. Communication Reports, 11, 155-165.
65. Werner, C., & Parmelee, P. (1979). Similarity of activity preferences among friends: Those who play together stay together. Social Psychology Quarterly, 42, 62-66.
66. Wright, P. H., & Crawford, A. C. (1971). Agreement and friendship: A close look and some second thoughts. Representative Research in Social Psychology, 2, 52-69.