Use of dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure body mass during short- to medium-term trials of nutrition and exercise interventions

Nutrition Reviews

Volumn 71, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 332-342

  Marinangeli, Christopher Pf ^a   Kassis, Amira N ^b  

^a Kellogg Canada Inc   (Canada)

^b NESTLÉ RESEARCH CENTER   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Body composition; Computed tomography; Dual X ray absorptiometry; Fat mass; Lean mass; Measurement error

Indexed keywords

ADIPOSE TISSUE; ARTICLE; BODY COMPOSITION; BODY MASS; DATA ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING EQUIPMENT; DIET THERAPY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EXERCISE; FAT MASS; HUMAN; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; LIFESTYLE; MULTICENTER STUDY (TOPIC); NUTRITION; OXIDATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ADIPOSE TISSUE; BODY COMPOSITION; HUMANS; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84878730665     PISSN: 00296643     EISSN: 17534887     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nure.12025     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. French SA, Jeffery RW, Murray D. Is dieting good for you? Prevalence, duration and associated weight and behaviour changes for specific weight loss strategies over four years in US adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1999;23:320-327.
2. Appel LJ, Clark JM, Yeh HC, etal. Comparative effectiveness of weight-loss interventions in clinical practice. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:1959-1968.
3. Schwartz AV, Johnson KC, Kahn SE, etal. Effect of 1 year of an intentional weight loss intervention on bone mineral density in type 2 diabetes: results from the look AHEAD randomized trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2012;27:619-627.
4. Caterson ID, Finer N, Coutinho W, etal. Maintained intentional weight loss reduces cardiovascular outcomes: results from the Sibutramine Cardiovascular OUTcomes (SCOUT) trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14:523-530.
5. Wilcox S, Sharpe PA, Parra-Medina D, etal. A randomized trial of a diet and exercise intervention for overweight and obese women from economically disadvantaged neighborhoods: Sisters Taking Action for Real Success (STARS). Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;32:931-945.
6. Aasen G, Fagertun H, Halse J. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66:659-666.
7. Covey MK, Berry JK, Hacker ED. Regional body composition: cross-calibration of DXA scanners - QDR4500W and Discovery Wi. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18:632-637.
8. Ioannidou E, Padilla J, Wang J, etal. Pencil-beam versus fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems: appendicular lean soft tissue. Acta Diabetol. 2003;40 (Suppl 1):S83-S85.
9. Nord RH, Homuth JR, Hanson JA, etal. Evaluation of a new DXA fan-beam instrument for measuring body composition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;904:118-125.
10. Louis O, Verlinde S, Thomas M, etal. Between-centre variability versus variability over time in DXA whole body measurements evaluated using a whole body phantom. Eur J Radiol. 2006;58:431-434.
11. Oldroyd B, Smith AH, Truscott JG. Cross-calibration of GE/Lunar pencil and fan-beam dual energy densitometers - bone mineral density and body composition studies. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2003;57:977-987.
12. Diessel E, Fuerst T, Njeh CF, etal. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89:599-605.
13. Soriano JMP, Ioannidou E, Wang J, etal. Pencil-beam vs fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry comparisons across four systems. J Clin Densitom. 2004;7:281-289.
14. Guo Y, Franks PW, Brookshire T, etal. The intra- and inter-instrument reliability of DXA based on ex vivo soft tissue measurements. Obes Res. 2004;12:1925-1929.
15. Hind K, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG. In vivo precision of the GE Lunar iDXA densitometer for the measurement of total body composition and fat distribution in adults. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2011;65:140-142.
16. Gluer CC. Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res. 1999;14:1952-1962.
17. Baim S, Wilson CR, Lewiecki EM, etal. Precision assessment and radiation safety for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: position paper of the International Society for Clinical Densitometry. J Clin Densitom. 2005;8:371-378.
18. Nelson L, Gulenchyn KY, Atthey M, etal. Is a fixed value for the least significant change appropriate? J Clin Densitom. 2010;13:18-23.
19. Cummings SR, Black D. Should perimenopausal women be screened for osteoporosis? Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:817-823.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307-310.
21. El Maghraoui A, Achemlal L, Bezza A. Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:281-286.
22. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1033-1039.
23. Wosje KS, Knipstein BL, Kalkwarf HJ. Measurement error of DXA: interpretation of fat and lean mass changes in obese and non-obese children. J Clin Densitom. 2006;9:335-340.
24. Valentine RJ, Misic MM, Kessinger RB, etal. Location of body fat and body size impacts DXA soft tissue measures: a simulation study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:553-559.
25. Bredella MA, Ghomi RH, Thomas BJ, etal. Comparison of DXA and CT in the assessment of body composition in premenopausal women with obesity and anorexia nervosa. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2010;18:2227-2233.
26. Lohman M, Tallroth K, Kettunen JA, etal. Reproducibility of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry total and regional body composition measurements using different scanning positions and definitions of regions. Metabolism. 2009;58:1663-1668.
27. Glickman SG, Marn CS, Supiano MA, etal. Validity and reliability of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of abdominal adiposity. J Appl Physiol. 2004;97:509-514.
28. Kullberg J, Brandberg J, Angelhed JE, etal. Whole-body adipose tissue analysis: comparison of MRI, CT and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Br J Radiol. 2009;82:123-130.
29. Snijder MB, Visser M, Dekker JM, etal. The prediction of visceral fat by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the elderly: a comparison with computed tomography and anthropometry. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2002;26:984-993.
30. Levine JA, Abboud L, Barry M, etal. Measuring leg muscle and fat mass in humans: comparison of CT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Appl Physiol. 2000;88:452-456.
31. Tylavsky FA, Lohman TG, Dockrell M, etal. Comparison of the effectiveness of 2 dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers with that of total body water and computed tomography in assessing changes in body composition during weight change. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;77:356-363.
32. Delmonico MJ, Kostek MC, Johns J, etal. Can dual energy X-ray absorptiometry provide a valid assessment of changes in thigh muscle mass with strength training in older adults? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2008;62:1372-1378.
33. Chumlea C, Sun SS. Bioelectrical impedance analysis. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Zimain W, etal., eds. Human Body Composition, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005:79-88.
34. Bosy-Westphal A, Later W, Hitze B, etal. Accuracy of bioelectrical impedance consumer devices for measurement of body composition in comparison to whole body magnetic resonance imaging and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Obes Facts. 2008;1:319-324.
35. Jensky-Squires NE, Dieli-Conwright CM, Rossuello A, etal. Validity and reliability of body composition analysers in children and adults. Br J Nutr. 2008;100:859-865.
36. Neovius M, Udden J, Hemmingsson E. Assessment of change in body fat percentage with DXA and eight-electrode BIA in centrally obese women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39:2199-2203.
37. Svantesson U, Zander M, Klingberg S, etal. Body composition in male elite athletes, comparison of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. J Negat Results Biomed. 2008;7:1.
38. Clasey JL, Bouchard C, Teates CD, etal. The use of anthropometric and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures to estimate total abdominal and abdominal visceral fat in men and women. Obes Res. 1999;7:256-264.
39. Browning LM, Mugridge O, Dixon AK, etal. Measuring abdominal adipose tissue: comparison of simpler methods with MRI. Obes Facts. 2011;4:9-15.
40. Lohman TG, Chen Z. Dual X-ray absorptiometry. In: Heymsfield SB, Lohman TG, Zimain W, etal., eds. Human Body Composition, 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005:63-77.
41. Plank LD. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and body composition. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:305-309.
42. Cordero-MacIntyre ZR, Peters W, Libanati CR, etal. Reproducibility of DXA in obese women. J Clin Densitom. 2002;5:35-44.
43. Genton L, Karsegard VL, Zawadynski S, etal. Comparison of body weight and composition measured by two different dual energy X-ray absorptiometry devices and three acquisition modes in obese women. Clin Nutr. 2006;25:428-437.