A microgenetic analysis of how expansive framing led to transfer with one struggling student

10th International Conference of the Learning Sciences: The Future of Learning, ICLS 2012 - Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 40-47

  Lam, Diane P ^a   Meyer, Xenia S ^a   Engle, Randi A ^a   Goldwasser, Lloyd ^a   Perez, Sarah ^a   Zheng, Kathleen ^a   Clark, Jim ^a   Naves, Erica ^a   Rosas, Hernan ^a   Tan, Danny ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HIGH SCHOOL; INSTRUCTIONAL PRACTICES; LEARNING CONTEXT;

STUDENTS;

EID: 84878700473     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Bateson, G. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. In Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology (pp. 177-193). New York: Ballantine.
2. Bereiter, C. (1995). A dispositional view of transfer. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Marini (Eds.), Teaching for transfer: Fostering generalization in learning (pp. 21-34). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school mathematics: Traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their effect on student learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (1999). Learning and transfer. In How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (pp. 39-66). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
5. Brown, A. L. (1989). Analogical learning and transfer: What develops? In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning (pp. 369-412). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge U. Press.
6. Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing interactions to foster generative learning: A situative account of transfer in a community of learners classroom. J. of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 451-498.
7. Engle, R. A., Lam, D. P., Meyer, X. S., & Nix, S. (in press). How does expansive framing promote transfer? Several proposed explanations. Educational Psychologist.
8. Engle, R. A., Meyer, X., Clark, J., White, J. & Mendelson, A. (2010). Expansive framing and transfer in a high school biology class: Hybridizing settings and promoting connections within a larger learning community. In R. A. Engle (organizer), Applying new mechanisms and conceptualizations of the 'transfer-of-learning' to science classrooms: The dynamic role of contexts and interactions. Symposium presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual International Conference, Philadelphia, PA.
9. Engle, R. A., Nguyen, P. D. & Mendelson, A. (2011). The influence of framing on transfer: Initial evidence from a tutoring experiment. Instructional Science, 39(5), 603-628.
10. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J. & Thompson, L. (2003). Learning and transfer: A general role for analogical encoding. J. of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 393-408.
11. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 1-38.
12. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
13. Greeno, J. G. (2006). Authoritative, accountable positioning and connected, general knowing: Progressive themes in understanding transfer. J. of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537-547.
14. Greeno, J. G., Smith, D. R., & Moore, J. L. (1993). Transfer of situated learning. In D. K. Detterman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction (pp. 99-127). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Hammer, D., Elby, A., Scherr, R. E., & Redish, E. F. (2005). Resources, framing, and transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
16. Hart, W. & Albarracin, D. (2009). What was doing vs. what I did: Verb aspect influences memory and future actions. Psychological Science, 20(2), 238-244.
17. Hatano, G. & Oura, Y. (2003). Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 26-29.
18. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Ed. Psychologist, 41, 111-127.
19. Hulleman, C. S. & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2009). Promoting interest and performance in high school science classes. Science, 326, 1410-1412.
20. Jacoby, S. & Gonzales, P. (1991). The construction of expert-novice in scientific discourse. Issues in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 149-181.
21. Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition. (1983). Culture and cognitive development. In P. H. Mussen (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. History, theory and methods (pp. 295-356). New York: Wiley.
22. Leander, K.M. (2001). "This is our freedom bus going home right now": Producing and hybridizing space-time contexts in pedagogical discourse. J. of Literacy Research, 33(4), 637-679.
23. Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods, 16(3), 243-264.
24. Mendelson, A. (2010). Using online forums to scaffold oral participation in foreign language instruction. L2 Journal, 2(1), 23-44.
25. Meyer, X., Mendelson, A., Engle, R.A. & Clark, J (2011). Expansive framing and transfer in a high school biology class: Promoting connections within and beyond the classroom. Manuscript submitted for publication.
26. Pea, R. D. (1987). Socializing the knowledge transfer problem. Int'l. J. of Educational Research, 11, 639-663.
27. Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance (pp. 373-404). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
28. Ross, B. H. (1984). Reminding and their effects in learning a cognitive skill. Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 371-416.
29. Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005). Efficiency and innovation in transfer. In J. Mestre (Ed.), Transfer of learning: Research and perspectives. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
30. Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In W. Damon & R.M. Lerner (Series Eds.) & D. Kuhn & R.S. Siegler (Vol. Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2: Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464-510). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
31. Tannen, D. (1993). Introduction. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp.3-13). New York: Oxford U. Press.