Identification of multiple interacting alleles conferring low glycerol and high ethanol yield in Saccharomyces cerevisiae ethanolic fermentation

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Hubmann, Georg ^a,b   Mathé, Lotte ^a,b   Foulquié Moreno, Maria R ^a,b   Duitama, Jorge ^c   Nevoigt, Elke ^d   Thevelein, Johan M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PLANT SYSTEMS BIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^c INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR TROPICAL AGRICULTURE CIAT   (Colombia)

^d JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Backcross; Causative gene; Complex trait; Epistasis; Glycerol yield; Minor QTL; Pooled segregant analysis; QTL analysis; Reverse metabolic engineering; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Indexed keywords

BACKCROSS; COMPLEX TRAITS; EPISTASIS; MINOR QTL; POOLED-SEGREGANT ANALYSIS; QTL ANALYSIS;

BIODIVERSITY; DNA SEQUENCES; ETHANOL; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLYCEROL; INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS; PLANTS (BOTANY); RATIONAL FUNCTIONS; REVERSE ENGINEERING; STRAIN; YEAST;

GENES;

ALLELE; BIODIVERSITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; YEAST;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84878695412     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1754-6834-6-87     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Glycerol overproduction by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains leads to substantial changes in by-product formation and to a stimulation of fermentation rate in stationary phase. Remize F, Roustan JL, Sablayrolles JM, Barre P, Dequin S, Appl Environ Microbiol 1999 65 143 149 9872772
2. Gpd1 and Gpd2 fine-tuning for sustainable reduction of glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Hubmann G, Guillouet S, Nevoigt E, Appl Environ Microbiol 2011 77 5857 5867 10.1128/AEM.05338-11 21724879
3. The two isoenzymes for yeast NAD + -dependent glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase encoded by GPD1 and GPD2 have distinct roles in osmoadaptation and redox regulation. Ansell R, Granath K, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Adler L, EMBO J 1997 16 2179 2187 10.1093/emboj/16.9.2179 9171333
4. Physiological response to anaerobicity of glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Bjorkqvist S, Ansell R, Adler L, Liden G, Appl Environ Microbiol 1997 63 128 132 8979347
5. Anaerobic and aerobic batch cultivations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants impaired in glycerol synthesis. Nissen TL, Hamann CW, Kielland-Brandt MC, Nielsen J, Villadsen J, Yeast 2000 16 463 474 10.1002/(SICI)1097- 0061(20000330)16:5<463::AID-YEA535>3.0.CO;2-3 10705374
6. Directed evolution of pyruvate decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yielding a C2-independent, glucose-tolerant, and pyruvate-hyperproducing yeast. van Maris AJ, Geertman JM, Vermeulen A, Groothuizen MK, Winkler AA, Piper MD, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Appl Environ Microbiol 2004 70 159 166 10.1128/AEM.70.1.159-166.2004 14711638
7. Unravelling evolutionary strategies of yeast for improving galactose utilization through integrated systems level analysis. Hong KK, Vongsangnak W, Vemuri GN, Nielsen J, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011 108 12179 12184 10.1073/pnas.1103219108 21715660
8. Recovery of phenotypes obtained by adaptive evolution through inverse metabolic engineering. Hong KK, Nielsen J, Appl Environ Microbiol 2012 78 7579 7586 10.1128/AEM.01444-12 22904057
9. In silico aided metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for improved bioethanol production. Bro C, Regenberg B, Forster J, Nielsen J, Metab Eng 2006 8 102 111 10.1016/j.ymben.2005.09.007 16289778
10. Yeast selection for fuel ethanol production in Brazil. Basso LC, de Amorim HV, de Oliveira AJ, Lopes ML, FEMS Yeast Res 2008 8 1155 1163 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2008.00428.x 18752628
11. Glycerol formation during wine fermentation is mainly linked to Gpd1p and is only partially controlled by the HOG pathway. Remize F, Cambon B, Barnavon L, Dequin S, Yeast 2003 20 1243 1253 10.1002/yea.1041 14618562
12. Wine flavor and aroma. Styger G, Prior B, Bauer FF, J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011 38 1145 1159 10.1007/s10295-011-1018-4 21786136
13. The use of genetically modified Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains in the wine industry. Schuller D, Casal M, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005 68 292 304 10.1007/s00253-005-1994-2 15856224
14. Production technologies for reduced alcoholic wines. Schmidtke LM, Blackman JW, Agboola SO, J Food Sci 2012 77 25 R41 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011. 02448.x 22260123
15. A gene encoding sn-glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) complements an osmosensitive mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Larsson K, Ansell R, Eriksson P, Adler L, Mol Microbiol 1993 10 1101 1111 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1993. tb00980.x 7934860
16. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Prior BA, Mol Cell Biol 1994 14 4135 4144 8196651
17. The yeast glycerol 3-phosphatases Gpp1p and Gpp2p are required for glycerol biosynthesis and differentially involved in the cellular responses to osmotic, anaerobic, and oxidative stress. Pahlman AK, Granath K, Ansell R, Hohmann S, Adler L, J Biol Chem 2001 276 3555 3563 10.1074/jbc.M007164200 11058591
18. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Hohmann S, Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2002 66 300 372 10.1128/MMBR.66.2.300-372.2002 12040128
19. Quantitative trait analysis of yeast biodiversity yields novel gene tools for metabolic engineering. Hubmann G, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Nevoigt E, Duitama J, Meurens N, Pais TM, Mathé L, Saerens S, Nguyen HTT, Swinnen S, et al. Metab Eng 2013 In press
20. Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Swinnen S, Schaerlaekens K, Pais T, Claesen J, Hubmann G, Yang Y, Demeke M, Foulquie-Moreno MR, Goovaerts A, Souvereyns K, et al. Genome Res 2012 22 975 984 10.1101/gr.131698.111 22399573
21. Genetic mapping of quantitative phenotypic traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Swinnen S, Thevelein JM, Nevoigt E, FEMS Yeast Res 2012 12 215 227 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00777.x 22150948
22. Dissection of genetically complex traits with extremely large pools of yeast segregants. Ehrenreich IM, Torabi N, Jia Y, Kent J, Martis S, Shapiro JA, Gresham D, Caudy AA, Kruglyak L, Nature 2010 464 1039 1042 10.1038/nature08923 20393561
23. Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. Parts L, Cubillos FA, Warringer J, Jain K, Salinas F, Bumpstead SJ, Molin M, Zia A, Simpson JT, Quail MA, et al. Genome Res 2011 21 1131 1138 10.1101/gr.116731.110 21422276
24. Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. Liti G, Louis EJ, PLoS Genet 2012 8 1002912 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002912 22916041
25. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Steinmetz LM, Sinha H, Richards DR, Spiegelman JI, Oefner PJ, McCusker JH, Davis RW, Nature 2002 416 326 330 10.1038/416326a 11907579
26. Small- and large-effect quantitative trait locus interactions underlie variation in yeast sporulation efficiency. Lorenz K, Cohen BA, Genetics 2012 192 1123 1132 10.1534/genetics.112.143107 22942125
27. Sequential elimination of major-effect contributors identifies additional quantitative trait loci conditioning high-temperature growth in yeast. Sinha H, David L, Pascon RC, Clauder-Munster S, Krishnakumar S, Nguyen M, Shi G, Dean J, Davis RW, Oefner PJ, et al. Genetics 2008 180 1661 1670 10.1534/genetics.108. 092932 18780730
28. Identification and dissection of a complex DNA repair sensitivity phenotype in Baker's yeast. Demogines A, Smith E, Kruglyak L, Alani E, PLoS Genet 2008 4 1000123 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000123 18617998
29. Simultaneous mapping of multiple gene loci with pooled segregants. Claesen J, Clement L, Shkedy Z, Foulquié-Moreno MR, Burzykowski T, PLoS One 2013 In press
30. Targeting the MEF2-like transcription factor Smp1 by the stress-activated Hog1 mitogen-activated protein kinase. de Nadal E, Casadome L, Posas F, Mol Cell Biol 2003 23 229 237 10.1128/MCB.23.1.229-237.2003 12482976
31. Osmostress-induced transcription by Hot1 depends on a Hog1-mediated recruitment of the RNA Pol II. Alepuz PM, de Nadal E, Zapater M, Ammerer G, Posas F, EMBO J 2003 22 2433 2442 10.1093/emboj/cdg243 12743037
32. Osmotic stress-induced gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires Msn1p and the novel nuclear factor Hot1p. Rep M, Reiser V, Gartner U, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S, Ammerer G, Ruis H, Mol Cell Biol 1999 19 5474 5485 10409737
33. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L, Connelly C, Riles L, Veronneau S, Dow S, Lucau-Danila A, Anderson K, Andre B, et al. Nature 2002 418 387 391 10.1038/nature00935 12140549
34. Functional characterization of the S. cerevisiae genome by gene deletion and parallel analysis. Winzeler EA, Shoemaker DD, Astromoff A, Liang H, Anderson K, Andre B, Bangham R, Benito R, Boeke JD, Bussey H, et al. Science 1999 285 901 906 10.1126/science.285.5429.901 10436161
35. QTL analyses: Power, precision and accuracy. Beavis W, Molecular Dissection of Complex Traits Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press Inc, Paterson AH, 1998 145 161
36. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae MADS-box transcription factor Rlm1 is a target for the Mpk1 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. Dodou E, Treisman R, Mol Cell Biol 1997 17 1848 1859 9121433
37. CDD: specific functional annotation with the conserved domain database. Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Fong JH, Geer LY, Geer RC, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, et al. Nucleic Acids Res 2009 37 205 210 10.1093/nar/gkn845 18984618
38. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. Rep M, Krantz M, Thevelein JM, Hohmann S, J Biol Chem 2000 275 8290 8300 10.1074/jbc.275.12.8290 10722658
39. Sambrook J, Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2 1989
40. Micromanipulation and dissection of asci. Sherman F, Hicks J, Methods Enzymol 1991 194 21 37 2005789
41. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Huxley C, Green ED, Dunham I, Trends Genet 1990 6 236 2238077
42. Growth and manipulation of yeast. Treco DA, Winston F, Curr Protoc Mol Biol 2001 nit13 12 Volume Chapter 13. 2008/02/12 edition
43. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Hoffman CS, Winston F, Gene 1987 57 267 272 10.1016/0378-1119(87)90131-4 3319781
44. A rapid method for determining sequences in DNA by primed synthesis with DNA polymerase. Sanger F, Coulson AR, J Mol Biol 1975 94 441 448 10.1016/0022-2836(75)90213-2 1100841
45. Detection of Phanerochaete chrysosporium in soil by PCR and restriction enzyme analysis. Johnston CG, Aust SD, Appl Environ Microbiol 1994 60 2350 2354 8074515
46. A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Gueldener U, Heinisch J, Koehler GJ, Voss D, Hegemann JH, Nucleic Acids Res 2002 30 23 10.1093/nar/30.6.e23 11884642
47. Improved method for high efficiency transformation of intact yeast cells. Gietz D, St Jean A, Woods RA, Schiestl RH, Nucleic Acids Res 1992 20 1425 10.1093/nar/20.6.1425 1561104