Effects of Er: YAG laser irradiation on wettability, surface roughness, and biocompatibility of SLA titanium surfaces: an in vitro study

Lasers in Medical Science

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 561-566

  Ayobian Markazi, Nader ^a   Karimi, Mohammadreza ^a   Safar Hajhosseini, Ali ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cell viability; Er: YAG laser; Osteoblast; Surface roughness; Titanium surfaces; Wettability

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; ERBIUM; TITANIUM; TOOTH IMPLANT;

CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; OSTEOBLAST; PROCEDURES; RADIATION RESPONSE; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SOLID STATE LASER; SURFACE PROPERTY; THERAPEUTIC USE; TOOTH IMPLANT; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WETTABILITY;

BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL LINE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; DECONTAMINATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ERBIUM; HUMANS; LASERS, SOLID-STATE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSTEOBLASTS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TITANIUM; WETTABILITY;

EID: 84878686260     PISSN: 02688921     EISSN: 1435604X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-013-1361-y     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Lee JH, Kwon YH, Herr Y, Shin SI, Chung JH (2011) Effect of erbium-doped: yttrium, aluminum, and garnet laser irradiation on the surface microstructure and roughness of sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched implants. J Periodontal Implants Sci 41:135–142
2. Albrektsson TO, Johansson CB, Sennerby L (1994) Biological aspects of implant dentistry: osseointegration. Periodontol 4:58–73
3. Becker W, Becker BE, Newman MG, Nyman S (1990) Clinical and microbiologic findings that may contribute to dental implant failure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5:31–38
4. Alcoforado GA, Rams TE, Feik D, Slots J (1991) Microbial aspects of failing osseointegrated dental implants in humans. J Parodontol 10:11–18
5. Mombelli A, Lang NP (1994) Microbial aspects of implant dentistry. Periodontol 2000(4):74–80
6. Mombelli A, Van Oosten MAC, Schurch E, Lang NP (1987) The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral MicrobiolImmunol 2:145–151
7. Schwarz F, Sculean A, Romanos G, Herten M, Horn N, Scherbaum W, Beker J (2005) Influence of different treatment approaches on the removal of early plaque biofilms and the viability of SAOS-2 osteoblasts grown on titanium implants. Clin Oral Invest 9:111–117
8. Fox SC, Morirty JD, Kusy RP (1990) The effects of scaling a titanium implant surface with metal and plastic instruments: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 61:485–490
9. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Christofers A, Gotz H, Jansen B, Duschner H, d’Hoedt B (2005) In vitro evaluation of the biocompatibility of contaminated implant. Surfaces treated with an Er: YAG laser and an air powder system. Clin Oral Implant Res 16:36–43
10. Takasaki A, Aoki A, Mizutani K, Kikuchi S, Oda S, Ishikawa I (2007) Er: YAG laser therapy for peri-implant infection: a histological study. Laser Med Sci 22:143–157
11. Kreisler M, Kohnen W, Marinello C, Gotz H, Duschner H, Janson B, d’Hoedt B (2002) Bactericidal effect of the Er: YAG laser on dental implant surfaces: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 73:1292–1296
12. Lampin M, Warocquier-Cleout R, Lergris C, Degrange M, Sigot-Luizard MF (1997) Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 36:99–108
13. Zhu X, Chen J, Scheideler L, Reichl R, Geis-Gerstorfer J (2004) Effects of topography and composition of titanium surface oxides on osteoblast responses. Biomaterial 25:4087–4103
14. Ayobian-Markazi N, Fourootan T, Zahmatkesh A (2012)An in vitro evaluation of the responses of human osteoblastic like SaOs-2 cells to SLA titanium surfaces irradiated by erbium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er: YAG) lasers. Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Nov 20. [Epub ahead of print]
15. Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er: YAG laser on dental hard substances. Ι. Measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9:338–344
16. Ando Y, Aoki A, Watanabe H, Ishikawa I (1996) Bactericidal effect of Erbium YAG Laser on periodontopathic bacteria. Lasers Surg Med 19:190–200
17. 2, and GaAlAs laser irradiation on surface properties of endosseous dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 17:202–211
18. Kreisler M, Al Haj H, d’Hoedt B (2002) Temperature changes at the implant–bone interface during simulated surface decontamination with an Er: YAG laser. Int J Prosthodont 15:582–587
19. Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Sculean A, Geory T, Scherbaum W, Beker J (2003) Effects of an Er: YAG laser and the vector ultrasonic system on the biocompatibility of titanium Implants in cultures of human osteoblast-like cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:784–792
20. Friedmann A, Antic L, Bernimoulin JP, Purucker P (2006) In vitro of osteoblasts on contaminated rough titanium surfaces treated by Er: YAG laser. J Biomed Mater Res A79:53–60
21. Romanos G, Crespi R, Barone A, Cavani U (2006) Osteoblast attachment on titanium disks after laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 21:232–236
22. Galli C, Macaluso GM, Elezi E, Ravanetti F, Cacchioli A, Gualini G, Passeri G (2011) The effects of Er: YAG laser treatment on titanium surface profile and osteoblastic cell activity: an in vitro study. J Periodontol 82:1169–1177
23. Baier RE, Meyer AE (1988) Implant surface preparation. Iny J Oral Maxillofac Implants 3:9–20
24. Sennerby L, Lekholm U (1993) The soft tissue response to titanium abutments retrieved from humans and reimplanted in rats. A light microscopic study. Clin Oral Implants Res 4:23–27
25. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H (1991) Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25:889–902
26. Chou L, Firth J, Uitto V, Brunette D (1995) Substratum surface topography alters cell shape and regulates fibronectin mRNA level, mRNA stability, secretion, and assembly in human fibroblasts. J Cell Sci 108:1563–1573
27. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Wothington P, Eriksson AR (1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants. A review of proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1:11–25
28. Park JY, Davies JE (2000) Red blood cell and platelet interactions with titanium implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:530–539
29. Bowers KT, Keller JC, Randolph BA, Wick DG, Michaels CM (1992) Optimization of surface micromorphology for enhanced osteoblast responses in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 7:302–310
30. Cei S, Legitimo A, Barachini S, Consolini R, Sammastino G, Matti L, Gabriel M, Graziani F (2011) Effect of laser micromachining of titanium on viability and responsiveness of osteoblast-like cells. Implant Dent 20:285–291
31. Bachle M, Kohal RJ (2004) A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation, and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral ImplRes 15:683–692
32. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Vant Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NHJ (2006) Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 85(6):496–500
33. Wennerberg A, Alberktsson T (2009) Effect of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Impl Res 20:172–184
34. Berglundh T, Gotfredsen K, Zitzmann NU, Lang NP, Lindhe J (2007) Spontaneous progression of ligature induced peri-implantitis at implants with different surface roughness: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 18:655–661
35. Stübinger S, Etter C, Miskiewicz M, Homman F, Soldamli B, Wieland M, Sader R (2010) Surface alteration of polished and sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants after Er: YAG, carbon dioxide, and diode laser irradiation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:104–111
36. Van Kooten TG, Schakenraad JM, van der Mei HC, Busscher HJ (1992) Influence of substratum wettability on the strength of adhesion of human fibroblasts. Biomaterials 13:897–904
37. Zhao G, Schwarz Z, Wieland M, Rupp F, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Cochran DL et al (2005) High-surface energy enhances cell response to titanium substrate microstructures. J Biomed Mater Res A 74:49–58
38. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL et al (2004) Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 83:533–539
39. Khosroshahi ME, Mahmoodi M, Saeedinasab H (2009) In vitro and in vivo studies of osteoblast cell response to a Titanium-6Aluminium-4 vanadium surface modified by neodymium: yttrium–aluminum–garnet laser and silicon carbide paper. Laser Med Sci 24:925–939
40. Hao L, Lawerence J, Li L (2005) The wettability modification of bio-grade stainless steel in contact with simulated physiological liquids by the means of laser irradiation. Appl Surf Sci 247:453–457
41. Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Liu X, Wieland M, Zhang ZY, Zhang ZY (2010) The influence of surface energy on early adherent events of osteoblast on titanium substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 93(1):289–296
42. Borgs C, De Coninck J, Kotecky R, Zinque M (1995) Does the roughness of the substrate enhance wetting? Phys Rev Lett 74:2292–4
43. Schwarz F, Ferrari D, Herten M, Mihatovic I, Wieland M, Sager M, Becker J (2007) Effects of surface hydrophilicity and microtopography on early stages of soft and hard tissue integration at non-submerged titanium implants: an immunohistochemical study in dogs. J Periodontol 78:2171–2184
44. Jang KS, Kim DS (2000) Surface roughness analysis of AVANA dental implant. J Korean Dent Assoc 38:956–960
45. Piattelli A, Misch CE, Pontes A, Iezzi G, Scarno A, Dedidi M (2008) Dental implant surfaces. In: Misch CE (ed) Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd edn. Mosby Co, Elsevier Inc, St Louis, pp 599–620