Improving the convergence rate in affine registration of PET and SPECT brain images using histogram equalization

Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine

Volumn 2013, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Salas Gonzalez, D ^a   Gorriz J M ^a   Ramirez J ^a   Padilla, P ^a   Illan I A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BRAIN MAPPING; COST FUNCTIONS; EQUALIZERS; GRAPHIC METHODS;

AFFINE REGISTRATION; AFFINE REGISTRATION ALGORITHMS; GAUSS-NEWTON OPTIMIZATION; HISTOGRAM EQUALIZATIONS; HISTOGRAM MATCHING; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; PRE-PROCESSING STEP; SUM OF SQUARED DIFFERENCES;

IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;

ALGORITHM; ALZHEIMER DISEASE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HISTOGRAM; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; KERNEL METHOD; NEUROIMAGING; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; BIOLOGY; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; SCINTISCANNING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; DIAGNOSTIC USE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CYSTEINE; CYSTEINE ETHYL ESTER TC 99M; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; TECHNETIUM COMPLEX;

ALGORITHMS; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; CYSTEINE; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NEUROIMAGING; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON;

EID: 84878644708     PISSN: 1748670X     EISSN: 17486718     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2013/760903     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Yin L. S., Tang L., Hamarneh G., Gill B., Celler A., Shcherbinin S., Fua T. F., Thompson A., Liu M., Duzenli C., Sheehan F., Moiseenko V., Complexity and accuracy of image registration methods in SPECT-guided radiation therapy. Physics in medicine and biology 2010 55 1 237 246 2-s2.0-77649196207
2. Salas-Gonzalez D., Górriz J. M., Ramírez J., Lassl A., Puntonet C. G., Improved Gauss-Newton optimisation methods in affine registration of SPECT brain images. Electronics Letters 2008 44 22 1291 1292 2-s2.0-54849410492 10.1049/el:20081838
3. Stout D. B., Komisopoulou E., Chatziioannou A. F., Chow P. L., A method of image registration for small animal, multi-modality imaging. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2006 51 2 379 390 2-s2.0-32544449487 10.1088/0031-9155/51/ 2/013 (Pubitemid 43231978)
4. Zagorchev L., Goshtasby A., A comparative study of transformation functions for nonrigid image registration. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2006 15 3 529 538 2-s2.0-32944457658 10.1109/TIP.2005.863114 (Pubitemid 43257553)
5. Freeborough P. A., Woods R. P., Fox N. C., Accurate registration of serial 3D MR brain images and its application to visualizing change in neurodegenerative disorders. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1996 20 6 1012 1022 2-s2.0-0029802526 10.1097/00004728-199611000-00030 (Pubitemid 26392576)
6. Holden M., Hill D. L. G., Denton E. R. E., Jarosz J. M., Cox T. C. S., Goodey J., Rohlfing T., Hawkes D. J., Voxel similarity measures for 3d serial mr image registration. IEEE Transactions in Medical Imaging 2000 19 94 102 (Pubitemid 30594811)
7. Chang S., Davis B., Chaney E., Strehl N., Foskey M., Goyal L., Large deformation three-dimensional image registration in image-guided radiation therapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2005 50 24 5869 5892 2-s2.0-29144447750 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/008 (Pubitemid 41795839)
8. Zitová B., Flusser J., Image registration methods: A survey. Image and Vision Computing 2003 21 11 977 1000 2-s2.0-0043237770 10.1016/S0262- 8856(03)00137-9
9. Hill D. L. G., Batchelor P. G., Holden M., Hawkes D. J., Medical image registration. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2001 46 3 R1 R45 2-s2.0-0035103741 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/201 (Pubitemid 32218849)
10. Thompson P. M., Toga A. W., The role of image registration in brain mapping. Image and Vision Computing 2001 19 1-2 3 24 2-s2.0-0035149270
11. Vandenberghea S., D'Asselera Y., de Wallea R. V., Kauppinenb T., Koolea M., Bouwensa L., Laerec K. V., Lemahieua I., Dierckx R., Iterative reconstruction algorithms in nuclear medicine. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2001 25 105 111 (Pubitemid 32011237)
12. Bruyant P. P., Analytic and iterative reconstruction algorithms in SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 2002 43 10 1343 1358 2-s2.0-0036788460
13. Zhou J., Luo L. M., Sequential weighted least squares algorithm for PET image reconstruction. Digital Signal Processing 2006 16 6 735 745 2-s2.0-33751192277 10.1016/j.dsp.2006.08.006 (Pubitemid 44779343)
14. Ramírez J., Górriz J. M., Gomez-Río M., Romero A., Chaves R., Lassl A., Rodriguez A., Puntonet C. G., Theis F., Lang E., Effective emission tomography image reconstruction algorithms for spect data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS '08) 2008 5101 Berlin, Germany Springer 741 748 Lecture Notes in Computer Science
15. Woods R. P., Grafton S. T., Holmes C. J., Cherry S. R., Mazziotta J. C., Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1998 22 1 139 152 2-s2.0-0031910991 10.1097/00004728-199801000-00027 (Pubitemid 28087337)
16. Thevenaz P., Blu T., Unser M., Bankman I. N., Image interpolation and resamplingin. Handbook of Medical Imaging, Processing and Analysis 2000 San Diego, Calif, USA Academic Press 393 420
17. Thevenaz P., Blu T., Unser M., Interpolation revisited. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2000 19 7 739 758 2-s2.0-0034214895 10.1109/42.875199
18. Nocedal J., Wright S. J., Numerical Optimization 1999 New York, NY, USA Springer