A Hybrid Route Choice Model for Dynamic Traffic Assignment

Networks and Spatial Economics

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 183-203

  Qian, Zhen Sean ^a   Zhang, H Michael ^a  

^a University of California   (United States)

Author keywords

Dynamic traffic assignment; Hybrid route choice; Traveler heterogeneity

Indexed keywords

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT(DTA); DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS; LARGE-SCALE NETWORK; REAL-TIME INFORMATION; ROUTE CHOICE; ROUTE CHOICE MODEL; TRAFFIC INFORMATION; TRAVELER HETEROGENEITY;

DIFFERENTIAL THERMAL ANALYSIS; NETWORK PERFORMANCE;

TRAFFIC CONTROL;

EID: 84878577534     PISSN: 1566113X     EISSN: 15729427     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11067-012-9177-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bell MGH, Shield CM, Busch F, Kruse G (1997) A stochastic user equilibrium path flow estimator. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 5(3-4): 197-210.
2. Bovy P, Stern E (1990) Wayfinding in transport networks. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. Bovy PH, Fiorenzo-Catalano S (2007) Stochastic route choice set generation: behavioral and probabilistic foundations. Transportmetrica 3(3): 173-189.
4. Carey M, Ge YE (2011) Comparison of methods for path flow reassignment for dynamic user equilibrium. Netw Spat Econ. doi: 10. 1007/s11067-011-9159-6.
5. Cascetta E, Nuzzolo A, Russo F, Vitetta A (1996) A modified logit route choice model overcoming path overlapping problems: specification and some calibration results for interurban networks. In: Proceedings from the thirteenth international symposium on transportation and traffic theory.
6. Daganzo C (1998) Queue spillovers in transportation networks with a route choice. Transp Sci 32(1): 3-11.
7. Daganzo CF (1994) The cell transmission model: a dynamic representation of highway traffic consistent with the hydrodynamic theory. Transp Res, Part B 28: 269-287.
8. Daganzo CF (1995) The cell transmission model, part II: network traffic. Transp Res, Part B 29: 79-93.
9. Dia H, Harney D, Boyle A (2001) Dynamics of drivers' route choice decisions under advanced traveler information systems. Roads and Transp Res 10: 2-12.
10. Friesz TL, Bernstein D, Smith TE, Tobin RL, Wei BW (1993) A variational inequality formulation of the dynamic network equilibrium problem. Oper Res 41: 179-191.
11. Gao S, Frejinger E, Ben-Akiva M (2011) Cognitive cost in route choice with real-time information: an exploratory analysis. Transp Res, Part A Policy Pract 45(9): 916-926.
12. Ghali M (1995) A note on the minimum instantaneous cost path of the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Ann Oper Res 60: 115-120.
13. Hawas YE (2004) Development and calibration of route choice utility models: neuro-fuzzy approach. J Transp Eng 130(2): 171-182.
14. Jin W, Zhang HM (2003) On the distribution schemes for determining flows through a merge. Transp Res, Part B 37: 521-540.
15. Jin W, Zhang HM (2004) Multicommodity kinematic wave simulation model for network traffic flow. Transp Res Rec 1883: 59-67.
16. Kant P (2008) Route choice modelling in dynamic traffic assignment. Master thesis, University of Twente. http://essay. utwente. nl/58303/.
17. Kuwahara M, Akamatsu T (2001) Dynamic user optimal assignment with physical queues for many-to-many od pattern. Transp Res, Part B 35: 461-479.
18. Lebacque J (1996) The godunov scheme and what it means for first order traffic flow models. In: Procedings of international symposium of transport and traffic theory, pp 79-102.
19. Lee C, Ran B, Yang F, Loh WY (2010) A hybrid tree approach to modeling alternate route choice behavior with online information. J of Intell Transp Sys: Technology, Planning, and Operations 14(4): 209-219.
20. Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves. ii. a theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc Royal Soc 229: 317-345.
21. Mahmassani HS, Jayakrishnan R (1991) System performance and user response under real-time information in a congested traffic corridor. Transp Res, Part A 25(5): 293-307.
22. Mahmassani HS, Liu YH (1999) Dynamics of commuting decision behaviour under advanced traveller information systems. Transp Res, Part C 7(2-3): 91-107.
23. Merchant D, Nemhauser G (1978) A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transp Sci 12: 183-199.
24. Nie X, Zhang HM (2005) A comparative study of some macroscopic link models used in dynamic traffic assignment. Netw Spat Econ 5: 89-115.
25. Nie Y (2006) A variational inequality approach for inferring dynamic origin-destination travel demands. PhD thesis, University of California at Davis.
26. Nie Y, Zhang HM (2010) Solving the dynamic user optimal assignment problem considering queue spillback. Netw Spat Econ 10(1): 49-71.
27. Nie YM, Wu X, de Mello TH (2011) Optimal path problems with second-order stochastic dominance constraints. Netw Spat Econ. doi: 10. 1007/s11067-011-9167-6.
28. Peeta S, Mahmassani HS (1995) Multiple user classes real-time traffic assignment for online operations: a rolling horizon solution framework. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 3(2): 83-98.
29. Peeta S, Yu JW (2005) A hybrid model for driver route choice incorporating en-route attributes and real-time information effects. Netw Spat Econ 5: 21-40.
30. Pel AJ, Bliemer MC, Hoogendoorn SP (2009) Hybrid routing choice modeling in dynamic traffic assignment. Transp Res Rec 2091: 100-107.
31. Ramming S (2002) Network knowledge and route choice. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
32. Ran B, Boyce DE, Leblanc LJ (1993) A new class of instantaneous dynamic user-optimal traffic assignment models. Oper Res 41(1): 192-202.
33. Reddy PDVG, Yang H, Vaughn KM, Abdel-Aty MA, Kitamura R, Jovanis PP (1995) Design of an artificial simulator for analyzing route choice behavior in the presence of information system. Math Comput Model 22(4-7): 119-147.
34. Richards PI (1956) Shock waves on the highway. Proc R Soc 4: 42-51.
35. Smith M (1993) A new dynamic traffic model and the existence and calculation of dynamic user equilibria on congested capacity-constrained road networks. Transp Res, Part B 26: 49-36.
36. Ukkusuri S, Patil G (2007) Exploring user behavior in online network equilibrium problems. Transp Res Rec: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2029: 31-38.
37. Vovsha P, Bekhor S (1998) The link-nested logit model of route choice: overcoming the route overlapping problem. Transp Res Rec 1645: 133-142.
38. Xu H, Zhou J, Xu W (2011) A decision-making rule for modeling travelers route choice behavior based on cumulative prospect theory. Transp Res, Part C Emerg Technol 19(2): 218-228.