Groups in Mendeley: Owners' descriptions and group outcomes

Proceedings of the ASIST Annual Meeting

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 1-4

  Jeng, Wei ^a   He, Daqing ^a   Jiang, Jiepu ^a   Zhang, Yang ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Academic social networking services; Mendeley; Online groups; Scholarly communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878531622     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15508390     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/meet.14504901256     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Baker, D.D., & Ganster, D.C. (1985). Leader communication style: A test of average versus vertical dyad linkage models. Group & Organization Studies, 10, 242-259.
2. Bozeman, B., Corley, E. (2004). Scientists' collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33(4), 599-616.
3. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., & Kraut, R. (2002). Community Effort in Online Groups: Who Does the Work and Why? Leadership at a Distance, 54(2), 346-362.
4. Gibbs, J. L., Ellison, N. B., & Heino, R. D. (2006). Self- Presentation in Online Personals: The role of anticipated future interaction, self-disclosure, and perceived success in Internet dating. Communication Research, 33(2), 152-177.
5. Greene, K., Derlega, V. J., & Mathews, A. (2006). Selfdisclosure in personal relationships. The Cambridge Handbook of Personal Relationships, 409-427. Cambridge University Press.
6. House, R. J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352.
7. Jiang, J., He, D., & Ni, C. (2011). Social reference: aggregating online usage of scientific literature in CiteULike for clustering academic resources. In Proceedings of JCDL'11, 401-402.
8. Letierce, J, Passant, A., Breslin, J. G. & Decker, S. (2010). Understanding how Twitter is used to spread scientific messages. In Proceedings of the WebSci'10, April 26-27th, 2010, Raleigh, NC: US.
9. Oh, J. S., & Jeng, W. (2011). Groups in Academic Social Networking Services - An Exploration of Their Potential as a Platform for Multi-disciplinary Collaboration. In Proceeding of 2011 IEEE SocialCom.
10. Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65-85.
11. Priem, J., & Costello, K. L. (2010). How and why scholars cite on Twitter. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47(1), 1-4.
12. Seijts, G. H., Latham, G. P., & Latham, B. W. (2004). Goal Setting and Goal Orientation: An Integration of Two Different yet Related Literatures. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 227-239.
13. Wu, D., He, D., Jiang, J., Dong, W., & Vo, K. T. (2012). The state of iSchools: an analysis of academic research and graduate education. Journal of Information Science, 38(1), 15-36