Concepts in Change

Science and Education

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1389-1403

  Rusanen, Anna Mari ^a   Pöyhönen, Samuli ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878510637     PISSN: 09267220     EISSN: 15731901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11191-012-9489-x     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Barsalou, L. W. (1990). On the indistinguishability of exemplar memory and abstraction in category representation. In T. K. Srull & R. S. Wyer (Eds.), Advances in social cognition, volume III: Content and process specificity in the effects of prior experiences (pp. 61-88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (1993). Discovering complexity, decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
3. Bishop, M., & Downes, S. (2002). The theory theory thrice over: The child as scientist, Superscientist or social institution? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 2002(33), 121-136.
4. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Carey, S. (1991). Knowledge acquisition: Enrichment or conceptual change? In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 257-291). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 13-19.
7. Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Carruthers, P., Stich, S., & Siegal, M. (Eds.). (2002). The cognitive basis of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science: Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 129-186). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
10. Chi, M. T. H. (2008). Three types of conceptual change: Belief revision, mental model transformation, and categorical shift. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), Handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 61-82). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Chi, M. T. H., Slotta, J. D., & de Leeuw, N. (1994). From things to processes: A theory of conceptual change for learning science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 4, 27-43.
12. Clement, J. (2008). The role of explanatory models in teaching for conceptual change. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research in conceptual change (pp. 417-452). New York: Routledge.
13. Craver, C. F. (2006). When mechanistic models explain. Synthese, 153, 355-376.
14. Craver, C. F. (2007). Explaining the brain: What a science of the mind-brain could be. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Dietrich, E., & Markman, A. B. (2003). Discrete thoughts: Why cognition must use discrete representations. Mind and Language, 18(1), 95-119.
16. diSessa, A. A. (1988). Knowledge in pieces. In G. Forman & P. Pufall (Eds.), Constructivism in the computer age (pp. 49-70). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. diSessa, A. A. (1993). Toward an epistemology of physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10(2, 3), 105-225.
18. diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research: Threads and fault lines. In K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 265-281). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. diSessa, A. A., & Sherin, B. (1998). What changes in conceptual change? International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1155-1191.
20. Downes, S. (1999). Can scientific development and children's cognitive development be the same process? Philosophy of Science, 66, 565-578.
21. Fuller, T. (2011). Is scientific theory change similar to early cognitive development? Gopnik on science and childhood. Philosophical Psychology, forthcoming.
22. Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1991). Language and categorization: The acquisition of natural kind terms. In S. A. Gelman & J. P. Byrnes (Eds.), Perspectives on language and thought: Interrelations in development (pp. 146-196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gentner, D., Brem, S., Ferguson, R. W., Wolff, P., Markman, A. B., & Forbus, K. D. (1997). Analogy and creativity in the works of Johannes Kepler. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 403-459). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
24. Goodman, N. D., Tenenbaum, J. B., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. L. (2008). A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32(1), 108-154.
25. Gopnik, A. (2011). Probabilistic models as theories of children's minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(4), 200-201.
26. Gopnik, A., & Meltzoff, A. (1997). Words, thoughts and theories. Cambridge: MIT Press.
27. Griffiths, T. L., Christian, B. R., & Kalish, M. L. (2008). Using category structures to test iterated learning as a method for identifying inductive biases. Cognitive Science, 32(1), 68-107.
28. Hacking, I. (2006). Des classifications naturelles (pp. 422-430). lectures at College de France. http://www. college-de-france. fr/media/historique/UPL17441_ihackingcours0506. pdf.
29. Keil, F. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, London: MIT Press.
30. Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press.
31. Kitcher, P. (1993). The advancement of science. Science without legend, objectivity without illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32. Koponen, I., & Pehkonen, M. (2010). Coherent knowledge structures of physics represented as concept networks in teacher education. Science & Education, 19, 259-282.
33. Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Lappi, O. (2011). How not to study conceptual change. In F. Seroglou, V. Koulountzos & A. Siatras (Eds.) The Proceedings of 11th International IHPST and 6th Greek History, Philosophy of Science Teaching Joint Conference, Epikentro Publishers.
35. Lappi, O., & Rusanen, A.-M. (2011). Turing machines and causal mechanisms in cognitive science. In P. McKay Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the sciences (pp. 224-239). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Machamer, P., Darden, L., & Craver, C. F. (2000). Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science, 67(1), 1-25.
37. Machery, E. (2009). Doing without concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
38. Murphy, G. L. (2004). The big book of concepts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
39. Murphy, G. L., & Medin, D. L. (1985). The role of theories in conceptual coherence. Psychological Review, 92(3), 289-316.
40. Nazer, D., Ruby, A., Nichols, S., Weinberg, J., Stich, S., Faucher, L., et al. (2002). The baby in the lab-coat: Why child development is not an adequate model for understanding the development of science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Seagal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 335-362). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Osherson, D., Smith, E. E., Wilkie, O., & López, A. (1990). Category-based induction. Psychological Review, 97(2), 185-200.
42. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
43. Rozenblit, L., & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 26, 521-562.
44. Smith, E., Langston, C., & Nisbett, R. E. (1992). The case for rules of reasoning. Cognitive Science, 16, 1-40.
45. Sobel, D., Tenenbaum, J., & Gopnik, A. (2004). Children's causal inferences from indirect evidence: Backwards blocking and Bayesian reasoning in preschoolers. Cognitive Science, 28(3), 303-333.
46. Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1982). Conceptual change and science teaching. European Journal of Science Education, 4(3), 231-240.
47. Tenenbaum, J., & Griffiths, T. (2001). Generalization, similarity, and Bayesian inference. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 629-641.
48. Thagard, P. (1990). Concepts and conceptual change. Synthese, 82, 255-274.
49. van Gelder, T., & Port, R. (1995). It's about time: Overview of the dynamical approach to cognition. In R. Port & T. van Gelder (Eds.), Mind as motion: Explorations in the dynamics of cognition (pp. 1-43). Cambridge: Bradford Books/MIT Press.
50. Vosniadou, S. (1992). Knowledge acquisition and conceptual change. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 41(4), 347-357.
51. Vosniadou, S. (1999). Conceptual change research: State of the art and future directions. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 3-13). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
52. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
53. Weisberg, M., & Muldoon, R. (2008). Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76, 225-252.
54. Woodward, J. (2003). Making things happen. A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press.
55. Zollman, K. (2007). The communication structure of epistemic communities. Philosophy of Science, 74(5), 574-587.