BioTrak virtual reality system: Effectiveness and satisfaction analysis for balance rehabilitation in patients with brain injury;BioTrak: Análisis de efectividad y satisfacción de un sistema de realidad virtual para la rehabilitación del equilibrio en pacientes con daño cerebral

Neurologia

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 268-275

  Llorens R ^a   Colomer Font, C ^b   Alcaniz M ^a,c   Noe Sebastian E ^c  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO DE SALUD CARLOS III   (Spain)

^c Hospital NISA Valencia al Mar y NISA Sevilla Aljarafe   (Spain)

Author keywords

Balance; Brain injury; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Usability; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; HEMIPARESIS; HUMAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION; STABILOGRAPHY; VIRTUAL REALITY;

ADULT; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARESIS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84878492887     PISSN: 02134853     EISSN: 15781968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nrl.2012.04.016     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ng S.S. Contribution of subjective balance confidence on functional mobility in subjects with chronic stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2011.
2. Perennou D., Decavel P., Manckoundia P., Penven Y., Mourey F., Launay F., et al. Evaluation of balance in neurologic and geriatric disorders. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005, 48:317-335.
3. Schmid A.A., Van Puymbroeck M., Knies K., Spangler-Morris C., Watts K., Damush T., et al. Fear of falling among people who have sustained a stroke: a 6-month longitudinal pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 2011, 65:125-132.
4. Tyson S.F., Hanley M., Chillala J., Selley A.B., Tallis R.C. The relationship between balance, disability, and recovery after stroke: predictive validity of the Brunel Balance Assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007, 21:341-346.
5. Moucha R., Kilgard M.P. Cortical plasticity and rehabilitation. Prog Brain Res 2006, 157:111-122.
6. Albiol S., Gil-Gomez J.A., Alcaniz M. Influence of tracking feedback in user motor response in rehabilitation therapy. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011, 154:34-38.
7. Burdea G.C. Virtual rehabilitation -benefits and challenges. Methods Inf Med 2003, 42:519-523.
8. Holden M.K. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychol Behav 2005, 8:187-211. discussion 212-9.
9. Penasco-Martin B., de los Reyes-Guzman A., Gil-Agudo A., Bernal-Sahun A., Perez-Aguilar B., de la Pena-Gonzalez A.I. Application of virtual reality in the motor aspects of neurorehabilitation. Rev Neurol 2010, 51:481-488.
10. Sveistrup H. Motor rehabilitation using virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004, 1:10.
11. Cameirao M.S., Badia S.B., Oller E.D., Verschure P.F. Neurorehabilitation using the virtual reality based Rehabilitation Gaming System: methodology, design, psychometrics, usability and validation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010, 7:48.
12. Holden M.K., Dyar T.A., Dayan-Cimadoro L. Telerehabilitation using a virtual environment improves upper extremity function in patients with stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2007, 15:36-42.
13. Bisson E., Contant B., Sveistrup H., Lajoie Y. Functional balance and dual-task reaction times in older adults are improved by virtual reality and biofeedback training. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007, 10:16-23.
14. Nyberg L., Lundin-Olsson L., Sondell B., Backman A., Holmlund K., Eriksson S., et al. Using a virtual reality system to study balance and walking in a virtual outdoor environment: a pilot study. Cyberpsychol Behav 2006, 9:388-395.
15. Oddsson L.I., Karlsson R., Konrad J., Ince S., Williams S.R., Zemkova E. A rehabilitation tool for functional balance using altered gravity and virtual reality. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007, 4:25.
16. Thornton M., Marshall S., McComas J., Finestone H., McCormick A., Sveistrup H. Benefits of activity and virtual reality based balance exercise programmes for adults with traumatic brain injury: perceptions of participants and their caregivers. Brain Inj 2005, 19:989-1000.
17. Kim J.H., Jang S.H., Kim C.S., Jung J.H., You J.H. Use of virtual reality to enhance balance and ambulation in chronic stroke: a double-blind, randomized controlled study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2009, 88:693-701.
18. Kizony R., Raz L., Katz N., Weingarden H., Weiss P.L. Video-capture virtual reality system for patients with paraplegic spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005, 42:595-608.
19. Burdea G.C., Lin M.C., Ribarsky W., Watson B. Special issue on haptics, virtual, and augmented reality. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2005, 11:611-613.
20. Jaffe D.L., Brown D.A., Pierson-Carey C.D., Buckley E.L., Lew H.L. Stepping over obstacles to improve walking in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia. J Rehabil Res Dev 2004, 41:283-292.
21. Keshner E.A., Kenyon R.V. The influence of an immersive virtual environment on the segmental organization of postural stabilizing responses. J Vestib Res 2000, 10:207-219.
22. Gil-Gomez J.A., Llorens R., Alcaniz M., Colomer C. Effectiveness of a Wii balance board-based system (eBaViR) for balance rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial in patients with acquired brain injury. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011, 8:30.
23. Saposnik G., Teasell R., Mamdani M., Hall J., McIlroy W., Cheung D., et al. Effectiveness of virtual reality using Wii gaming technology in stroke rehabilitation: a pilot randomized clinical trial and proof of principle. Stroke 2011, 41:1477-1484.
24. Barclay-Goddard R., Stevenson T., Poluha W., Moffatt M.E., Taback S.P. Force platform feedback for standing balance training after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004, CD004129.
25. De Haart M., Geurts A.C., Dault M.C., Nienhuis B., Duysens J. Restoration of weight-shifting capacity in patients with postacute stroke: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005, 86:755-762.
26. Srivastava A., Taly A.B., Gupta A., Kumar S., Murali T. Post-stroke balance training: role of force platform with visual feedback technique. J Neurol Sci 2009, 287:89-93.
27. Blesa R., Pujol M., Aguilar M., Santacruz P., Bertran-Serra I., Hernandez G., et al. Clinical validity of the 'mini-mental state' for Spanish speaking communities. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39:1150-1157.
28. Sloan R.L., Sinclair E., Thompson J., Taylor S., Pentland B. Inter-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity in hemiplegic patients. Int J Rehabil Res 1992, 15:158-161.
29. Tyson S.F., DeSouza L.H. Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clin Rehabil 2004, 18:801-810.
30. Berg K., Wood-Dauphinee S., Williams J.I. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1995, 27:27-36.
31. Tinetti M.E. Performance-oriented assessment of mobility problems in elderly patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 1986, 34:119-126.
32. Baydal-Bertomeu J.M., Viosca-Herrero E., Ortuño-Cortes M.A. Estudio de eficacia y fiabilidad de un sistema de posturografía en comparación con la escala Berg. Rehabilitación 2010, 44:304-310.
33. Witmer B., Singer M. Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence. 1998;7.
34. Tyson S.F., Hanley M., Chillala J., Selley A., Tallis R.C. Balance disability after stroke. Phys Ther 2006, 86:30-38.
35. Donoghue D., Stokes E.K. How much change is true change? The minimum detectable change of the Berg Balance Scale in elderly people. J Rehabil Med 2009, 41:343-346.
36. Faber M.J., Bosscher R.J., van Wieringen P.C. Clinimetric properties of the performance-oriented mobility assessment. Phys Ther 2006, 86:944-954.
37. Stevenson T.J. Detecting change in patients with stroke using the Berg Balance Scale. Aust J Physiother 2001, 47:29-38.
38. Basford J.R., Chou L.S., Kaufman K.R., Brey R.H., Walker A., Malec J.F., et al. An assessment of gait and balance deficits after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003, 84:343-349.
39. Pickett T.C., Radfar-Baublitz L.S., McDonald S.D., Walker W.C., Cifu D.X. Objectively assessing balance deficits after TBI: Role of computerized posturography. J Rehabil Res Dev 2007, 44:983-990.
40. You S.H., Jang S.H., Kim Y.H., Hallett M., Ahn S.H., Kwon Y.H., et al. Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke 2005, 36:1166-1171.
41. Weiss P.L., Bialik P., Kizony R. Virtual reality provides leisure time opportunities for young adults with physical and intellectual disabilities. Cyberpsychol Behav 2003, 6:335-342.
42. Weiss P.L., Rand D., Katz N., Kizony R. Video capture virtual reality as a flexible and effective rehabilitation tool. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2004, 1:12.
43. Rossi-Izquierdo M., Soto-Varela A., Santos-Perez S., Sesar-Ignacio A., Labella-Caballero T., Rossi-Izquierdo M., et al. Vestibular rehabilitation with computerised dynamic posturography in patients with Parkinson's disease: improving balance impairment. Disabil Rehabil 2009, 31:1907-1916.