Is it possible to improve the accuracy of implants inserted with a stereolithographic surgical guide by reducing the tolerance between mechanical components?

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

Volumn 42, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 887-890

  Cassetta, M ^a   Di Mambro, A ^a   Giansanti, M ^a   Stefanelli, L V ^a   Barbato, E ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BONE IMPLANT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DRILL GUIDE; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; OSTEOTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROTATION; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; STEREOLITHOGRAPHIC SURGICAL GUIDE; SURGICAL ERROR;

ADULT; DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878481590     PISSN: 09015027     EISSN: 13990020     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.01.011     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. V. Arisan, Z.C. Karabuda, and T. Özdemir Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study J Periodontol 81 2010 43 51
2. J. D'Haese, T. Van De Velde, A. Komiyama, M. Hultin, and H. De Bruyn Accuracy and complications using computer-designed stereolithographic surgical guides for oral rehabilitation by means of dental implants: a review of the literature Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 2012 321 335 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010. 00275.x
3. A. Pettersson, A. Komiyama, M. Hultin, K. Näsström, and B. Klinge Accuracy of virtually planned and template guided implant surgery on edentate patients Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010. 00285.x May 11 [Epub ahead of print]
4. D. Schneider, P. Marquardt, M. Zwahlen, and R.E. Jung A systematic review on the accuracy and the clinical outcome of computer-guided template-based implant dentistry Clin Oral Implants Res 20 2009 73 86
5. N. Van Assche, and M. Quirynen Tolerance within a surgical guide Clin Oral Implants Res 21 2010 455 458
6. G.A. Mandelaris, A.L. Rosenfeld, S.D. King, and M.L. Nevins Computer-guided implant dentistry for precise implant placement: combining specialized stereolithographically generated drilling guides and surgical implant instrumentation Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 30 2010 274 281
7. M. Cassetta, M. Giansanti, A. Di Mambro, S. Calasso, and E. Barbato Accuracy of two stereolithographic surgical templates: a retrospective study Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2011 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00369.x July 11 [Epub ahead of print]
8. M. Cassetta, A. Di Mambro, M. Giansanti, L.V. Stefanelli, and Cavallini C The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012 10.1016/j.ijom.2012.06.010 July 11 [Epub ahead of print]
9. M. Cassetta, L.V. Stefanelli, M. Giansanti, A. Di Mambro, and S. Calasso Depth deviation and occurrence of early surgical complications or unexpected events using a single stereolithographic surgi-guide Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40 2011 1377 1387
10. J. D'Haese, T. Van De Velde, L. Elaut, and H. De Bruyn A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 14 2012 293 303 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00255.x