Examining the relationship between completeness of teachers' implementation of the Krachtvoer healthy diet programme and changes in students' dietary intakes

Public Health Nutrition

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 1273-1280

  Bessems, Kathelijne M H H ^a   Van Assema, Patricia ^a   Crutzen, Rik ^a   Paulussen, Theo G W M ^b   De Vries, Nanne K ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b TNO   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Implementation; Nutrition education; School

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; FRUIT; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; MALE; MEAL; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SCHOOL; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; STATISTICAL MODEL; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; VEGETABLE; ARTICLE; METHODOLOGY;

ADOLESCENT; BREAKFAST; CHILD; DIET; FACULTY; FEMALE; FOOD HABITS; FRUIT; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; QUESTIONNAIRES; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS; VEGETABLES;

EID: 84878466336     PISSN: 13689800     EISSN: 14752727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980012003618     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ammerman AS, Lindquist CH, Lohr KN et al. (2002) The efficacy of behavioral interventions to modify dietary fat and fruit and vegetable intake: a review of the evidence. Prev Med 35, 25-41.
2. Knai C, Pomerleau J, Lock K et al. (2006) Getting children to eat more fruit and vegetables: a systematic review. Prev Med 42, 85-95.
3. Van Cauwenberghe E, Maes L, Spittaels H et al. (2010) Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: systematic review of published and 'grey' literature. Br J Nutr 103, 781-797.
4. Dobson D & Cook TJ (1980) Avoiding type 3 errors in program evaluation: results from a field experiment. Eval Program Plann 3, 269-276.
5. Wilson KD & Kurz RS (2008) Bridging implementation and institutionalization within organizations: proposed employment of continuous quality improvement to further dissemination. J Public Health Manag Pract 14, 109-116.
6. Derzon JH, Sale E, Springer JF et al. (2005) Estimating intervention effectiveness: synthetic projection of field evaluation results. J Prim Prev 26, 321-343.
7. Durlak JA & DuPre EP (2008) Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol 41, 327-350.
8. Stevens V, Van Oost P & De Bourdeaudhuij I (2001) Implementation process of the Flemish antibullying intervention and relation with program effectiveness. J Sch Psychol 39, 303-317.
9. Telzrow CF, McNamara K & Hollinger CL (2000) Fidelity of problem-solving implementation and relationship to student performance. Sch Psychol Rev 29, 443-461.
10. Bessems KMHH, Van Assema P, Martens MK et al. (2011) Appreciation and implementation of the Krachtvoer healthy diet promotion programme for 12-to 14-year-old students of prevocational schools. BMC Public Health 11, 909.
11. Bessems KMHH (2011) The dissemination of the healthy diet programme Krachtvoer for Dutch prevocational schools. PhD Thesis, Maastricht University.
12. Raaijmakers LGM, Bessems KMHH, Kremers SPJ et al. (2009) Breakfast consumption among children and adolescents in the Netherlands. Eur J Public Health 20, 318-324.
13. Boekaerts M, Rintrich PR & Zeider M (2000) Handbook of Self Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
14. Martens M, Van Assema P, Paulussen T et al. (2006) Krachtvoer: process evaluation of a Dutch programme for lower vocational schools to promote healthful diet. Health Educ Res 21, 695-704.
15. Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (2003) Website on guidelines for involving human subjects in Dutch scientific research. http://www. ccmo-online. nl (accessed April 2011).
16. Keij I (2000) Standaarddefinitie allochtonen (Standard Definition of Ethnic Minorities). Heerlen: CBS.
17. Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau (2006) Statusscores postcodegebieden (Status Scores Postal Code Areas). Den Haag: Sociaal Cultureel Planbureau.
18. Van Assema P, Brug J, Ronda G et al. (2002) A short Dutch questionnaire to measure fruit and vegetable intake: relative validity among adults and adolescents. Nutr Health 16, 85-106.
19. Voedingscentrum (2006) Assortimentsmeter. Den Haag: Voedingscentrum.
20. Martens M, Wind M, Van Assema P et al. (2002) De (on)mogelijkheden van voedingsvoorlichting aan twaalf-tot veertienjarige jongeren Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Dietisten (The (im)possibilities of nutrition education to twelve to fourteen year old adolescents). Dutch J Diet 57, 71-77.
21. Tak NI, Te Velde SJ & Brug J (2009) Long-term effects of the Dutch Schoolgruiten Project-promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among primary-school children. Public Health Nutr 12, 1213-1223.
22. Wind M, Bjelland M, Perez-Rodrigo C et al. (2008) Appreciation and implementation of a school-based intervention are associated with changes in fruit and vegetable intake in 10-to 13-year old schoolchildren-the Pro Children study. Health Educ Res 23, 997-1007.
23. Dusenbury L, Brannigan R, Falco M et al. (2003) A review of research on fidelity of implementation: implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings. Health Educ Res 18, 237-256.
24. Ringwalt C, Pankratz M, Gottfredson N et al. (2000) The effects of students' curriculum engagement, attitudes toward their teachers, and perception of their teachers' skills on school-based prevention curriculum outcomes. J Drug Educ 39, 223-237.
25. Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R et al. (2011) Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Pol Ment Health 38, 65-76.
26. Carroll C, Patterson M, Wood S et al. (2007) A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity. Implement Sci 2, 40.