Modelling the interindividual variability of organogenesis in sugar beet populations using a hierarchical segmented model

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 263, Issue , 2013, Pages 56-63

  Baey, Charlotte ^a   Didier, Anne ^b   Lemaire, Sébastien ^b   Maupas, Fabienne ^b   Cournède, Paul Henry ^a  

^a Ecole Centrale de Paris   (France)

^b Institut Technique de la Betterave   (France)

Author keywords

Hierarchical model; Interindividual variability; Nonlinear mixed model; Plant growth modelling; Segmented regression; Sugar beet

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL MODEL; INTERINDIVIDUAL VARIABILITY; NONLINEAR MIXED MODEL; PLANT GROWTH; SEGMENTED REGRESSIONS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; NITROGEN; PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; PLANTS (BOTANY);

SUGAR BEETS;

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GROWTH MODELING; LINEARITY; POPULATION STRUCTURE; SUGAR BEET;

BETA VULGARIS SUBSP. VULGARIS;

EID: 84878453641     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2013.04.013     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bauer A., Frank A.B., Black A.L. Estimation of spring wheat grain dry matter assimilation from air temperature. Agronomy Journal 1984, 5(77):743-752.
2. Beal S.L., Sheiner L.B. Estimating population kinetics. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 1982, 8(3):195-222.
3. Bolker B.M., Brooks M.E., Clark C.J., Geange S.W., Poulsen J.R., Stevens M.H.H., White J.-S.S. Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2009, 24(3):127-135.
4. Brouwer J., Fussell L.K., Herrmann L. Soil and crop growth micro-variability in the west African semi-arid tropics: a possible risk-reducing factor for subsistence farmers. Agriculture. Ecosystems and Environment 1993, 45(3-4):229-238.
5. Cao W., Moss D.N. Temperature and daylength interaction on phyllochron in wheat and barley. Crop Science 1989, 29(4):104.
6. Casella G., Berger R.L. Statistical Inference 2002, Thomson Learning, Pacific Grove, CA. 2nd edition.
7. Clerget B., Dingkuhn M., Gozé E., Rattunde H.F.W., Ney B. Variability of phyllochron plastochron and rate of increase in height in photoperiod-sensitive sorghum varieties. Annals of Botany 2008, 101(4):579-594.
8. Comets E., Verstuyft C., Lavielle M., Jaillon P., Becquemont L., Mentré F. Modelling the influence of MDR1 polymorphism on digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 2007 May, 63(5):437-449.
9. Comets E., Brendel K., Mentré F. Computing normalised prediction distribution errors to evaluate nonlinear mixed-effect models: the npde add-on package for R. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2008, 90(2):154-166.
10. Courbaud B., Vieilledent G., Kunstler G. Intra-specific variability and the competition-colonisation trade-off: coexistence, abundance and stability patterns. Theoretical Ecology 2012, 5(1):61-71.
11. Cournède P.-H., Kang M.-Z., Mathieu A., Barczi J.-F., Yan H.-P., Hu B.-G., de Reffye P. Structural factorization of plants to compute their functional and architectural growth. Simulation 2006, 82(7):427-438.
12. Cournède P.-H., Guyard T., Bayol B., Griffon S., de Coligny F., Borianne P., Jaeger M., de P., Reffye A forest growth simulator based on functional-structural modelling of individual trees. 3rd International Symposium on Plant Growth and Applications (PMA09), Beijing, China 2009, B. Li, M. Jaeger, Y. Guo (Eds.).
13. Davidian M., Giltinan D.M. Nonlinear Models for Repeated Measurement Data 1995, Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York. 1st edition.
14. Davidian M., Giltinan D.M. Nonlinear models for repeated measurement data: an overview and update. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2003, 8(4):387-419.
15. de Reffye P., Lemaire S., Srivastava N., Maupas F., Cournède P.-H. Modeling inter-individual variability in sugar beet populations. 3rd International Symposium on Plant Growth and Applications (PMA09), Beijing, China 2009, B. Li, M. Jaeger, Y. Guo (Eds.).
16. Delyon B., Lavielle M., Moulines E. Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm. The Annals of Statistics 1999, 27(1):94-128.
17. Dietze M.C., Wolosin M.S., Clark J.S. Capturing diversity and interspecific variability in allometries: a hierarchical approach. Forest Ecology and Management 2008, 256(11):1939-1948.
18. Draycott A.P., Christensen D.R. Nutrients for Sugar Beet Production: Soil-Plant Relationships 2003, CABI Publishing, Wallingford.
19. Durr C., Boiffin J. Sugarbeet seedling growth from germination to first leaf stage. Journal of Agricultural Science 1995, 124:427-435.
20. Fletcher A.L., Chakwizira E., Maley S., George M. Canopy development and radiation use efficiency of four forage brassica crops. Proceedings of the 16th Australian Agronomy Conference 2012, I. Yunusa (Ed.).
21. Fourcaud T., Zhang X.P., Stokes A., Lambers H., Körner C. Plant growth modelling and applications: the increasing importance of plant architecture in growth models. Annals of Botany 2008, 101(8):1053-1063.
22. Fournier C., Andrieu B. ADEL-maize: an L-system based model for the integration of growth processes from the organ to the canopy. Application to regulation of morphogenesis by light availability. Agronomy 1999, 19(3-4):313-327.
23. Frank A., Bauer A. Phyllochron differences in wheat, barley and forage grasses. Crop Science 1995, 35(1):19-23.
24. Hall D., Bailey R. Modeling and prediction of forest growth variables based on multilevel nonlinear mixed models. Forest Science 2001, 47(3):311-332. ISSN 0015-749X.
25. Jullien A., Mathieu A., Allirand J.-M., Pinet A., de Reffye P., Cournède P.-H., Ney B. Characterisation of the interactions between architecture and source:sink relationships in Winter Oilseed Rape (Brassica Napus L.) using the GreenLab model. Annals of Botany 2011, 107(5):765-779.
26. Juskiw P., Helm J., Nyachiro J. Measuring phyllochrons in barley to use for seeding rate recommendations. 18th North American Barley Researchers Workshop 2005.
27. Ke C., Wang Y. Semiparametric nonlinear mixed-effects models and their applications. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001, 96(456):1272-1298. 0162-1459.
28. Kuhn E., Lavielle M. Coupling a stochastic approximation version of EM with an MCMC procedure. ESAIM: Probability and Statistics 2004, 8:115-131.
29. Kuhn E., Lavielle M. Maximum likelihood estimation in nonlinear mixed effects models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 2005, 49(4):1020-1038.
30. Lavielle M., Samson A., Fermin A.K., Mentré F. Maximum likelihood estimation of long term HIV dynamic models and antiviral response. Biometrics 2011, 67(1):250-259.
31. Lee G.S., Schmehl W. Effect of planting date and nitrogen fertility on appearance and senescence of sugarbeet leaves. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 1988, 25(1):28-41.
32. Lemaire S., Maupas F., Cournéde P.-H., de Reffye P. A morphogenetic crop model for sugar-beet (Beta vulgaris L.). International Symposium on Crop Modeling and Decision Support: ISCMDS 2008 2008.
33. Lemaire S., Maupas F., Cournède P.-H., Allirand J.-M., de Reffye P., Ney B. Analysis of the density effects on the source-sink dynamics in sugar-beet growth. 3rd International Symposium on Plant Growth Modelling, Visualization and Applications (PMA09), Beijing, China 2009, B. Li, M. Jaeger, Y. Guo (Eds.).
34. Li X. Hierarchical segmented regression models with application to a wood density study 2007, Simon Fraser University, (Master's thesis).
35. Lindstrom M.J., Bates D.M. Nonlinear mixed effects models. Biometrics 1990, 46:673-687.
36. Liu W., Tollenaar M., Stewart G., Deen W. Response of corn grain yield to spatial and temporal variability in emergence. Crop Science 2004, 854(44):847-854.
37. Makowski D., Lavielle M. Using SAEM to estimate parameters of models of response to applied fertilizer. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics 2006, 11(1):45-60.
38. Milford G.F.J., Pocock T.O., Riley J. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. I. Leaf appearance and expansion in relation to temperature under controlled conditions. Annals of Applied Biology 1985, 106(1):163-172.
39. Milford G.F.J., Pocock T.O., Riley J. An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. II. Leaf appearance in field crops. Annals of Applied Biology 1985, 17:3-185.
40. Monod H., Naud C., Makowski D. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis for crop models. Working with Dynamic Crop Models 2006, 55-96. Elsevier, Amsterdam. D. Wallach, D. Makowski, J.W. Jones (Eds.).
41. Morrell C., Pearson J., Carter H., Brant L. Estimating unknown transition times using a piecewise nonlinear mixed-effects model in men with prostate cancer. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1995, 90(429).
42. Mutz R., Guilley E., Sauter U., Nepveu G. Modelling juvenile-mature wood transition in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) using nonlinear mixed-effects models. Annals of Forest Science 2004, 61(8):831-841.
43. Nothdurft A., Kublin E., Lappi J. A non-linear hierarchical mixed model to describe tree height growth. European Journal of Forest Research 2006, 125(March (3)):281-289. 1612-4669.
44. Pinheiro J.C., Bates D.M. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS 2000, Springer, New York.
45. Renno J.-F., Winkel T. Phenology and reproductive effort of cultivated and wild forms of Pennisetum glaucum under experimental conditions in the Sahel: implications for the maintenance of polymorphism in the species. Canadian Journal of Botany 1996, 74:959-964.
46. Sibma L. Maximization of arable crop yields in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 1977, 25:278-287.
47. Sievänen R., Perttunen J., Nikinmaa E., Kaitaniemi P. Toward extension of a single tree functional-structural model of scots pine to stand level: effect of the canopy of randomly distributed, identical trees on development of tree structure. Functional Plant Biology 2008, 35(10):964-975.
48. Stout M. A new look at some nitrogen relationships affecting the quality of sugar beets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 1961, 11(5):388-398.
49. Streck N.A., Bellé R.A., da Rocha E.K., Schuh M. Estimating leaf appearance rate and phyllochron in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Ciència Rural 2005, 35:1448-1450.
50. The Monolix Team User Guide to Monolix 2013.
51. Vieilledent G., Courbaud B., Kunstler G., DhÔte J.-F., Clark J.S. Individual variability in tree allometry determines light resource allocation in forest ecosystems: a hierarchical Bayesian approach. Oecologia 2010, 163(3):759-773.
52. Vos J., Marcelis L.F.M., Evers J.B. Functional-structural plant modelling in crop production. Functional-structural Plant Modelling in Crop Production 2007, Springer, Wageningen, (Chapter 1). J. Vos, L.F.M. Marcelis, P.H.B. de Visser, P.C. Struik, J.B. Evers (Eds.).
53. Walker S. An EM algorithm for nonlinear random effects models. Biometrics 1996, 52(3):934-944.
54. Wernecke P., Müller J., Dornbusch T., Wernecke A., Diepenbrock W. The virtual crop-modelling system VICA specified for barley. Functional-Structural Plant Modelling in Crop Production 2007, Citeseer, pp. 58-69. J. Vos, L.F.M. Marcelis, P.H.B. de Visser, P.C. Struik, J.B. Evers (Eds.).
55. Wilhelm W.W., McMaster G.S. Importance of the phyllochron in studying in development and growth in grasses. Crop Science 1995, 35(1):1-3.
56. Wolfinger R.D., Lin X., Drice S.A.S. Two Taylor-series approximation methods for nonlinear mixed models. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1997, 25:465-490.
57. Xue Q., Weiss A., Baenziger P.S. Predicting leaf appearance in field-grown winter wheat: evaluating linear and non-linear models. Ecological Modelling 2004, 175(3):261-270.