Toward extension of a single tree functional-structural model of Scots pine to stand level: Effect of the canopy of randomly distributed, identical trees on development of tree structure

Functional Plant Biology

Volumn 35, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 964-975

  Sievänen, Risto ^a   Perttunen, Jari ^a   Nikinmaa, Eero ^b   Kaitaniemi, Pekka ^b  

^a FINNISH FOREST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

Author keywords

Forest; Pinus sylvestris L.

Indexed keywords

COMBINES; MODEL STRUCTURES; NEEDLES; PLANT LIFE EXTENSION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TREES (MATHEMATICS); WOOD PRODUCTS;

ARCHITECTURAL LEVELS; CARBON BALANCES; FINLAND; FOREST; FOREST GAPS; GROWTH DECLINES; INDIVIDUAL TREES; LEVEL OF DETAILS; PINUS SYLVESTRIS L.; PLANT GROWTH MODELS; PROCESS-BASED MODELS; RANDOMLY DISTRIBUTED; RESOURCE ACQUISITIONS; SCOTS PINES; STAND DEVELOPMENTS; STAND LEVELS; STRUCTURAL MODELS; TIME STEPS; TREE CROWNS; TREE GROWTHS; TREE STANDS; TREE STRUCTURES;

FORESTRY;

CONIFEROUS TREE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; GROWTH MODELING; PLANT ARCHITECTURE; RESOURCE ALLOCATION;

FORESTS; NEEDLES; PINUS SYLVESTRIS; SAP WOOD; THREE DIMENSIONAL DESIGN; WOOD PRODUCTS;

PINUS SYLVESTRIS;

EID: 55949109371     PISSN: 14454408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/FP08077     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Assmann E (1970) 'The principles of forest yield study.' (Pergamon Press: Oxford)
2. 2-fixing tree managed by periodic prunings. Plant, Cell & Environment 23, 1025-1040. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2000.00624.x
3. Berninger F, Coll L, Vanninen P, Mäkelä A, Palmroth S, Nikinmaa E (2005) Effects of tree size and position on pipe model ratios in Scots pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 35, 1294-1304. doi: 10.1139/x05-055
4. Björklund L (1999) Identifying heartwood-rich stands or stems of Pinus sylvestris by using inventory data. Silva Fennica 33, 119-129.
5. Cournède P-H, Mathieu A, Houllier F, Barthélémy D, de Reffye P (2007) Computing competition for light in the GREENLAB model of plant growth: a contribution to the study of the effects of density on resource acquisition and architectural development. Annals of Botany 101, 1207-1219. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm272
6. de Kroon H, Huber H, Stuefer JF, van Groenendael JM (2005) A modular concept of phenotypic plasticity in plants. New Phytologist 166, 73-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01310.x
7. DeAngelis DL, Gross LJ (1992) 'Individual-based models and approaches in ecology. Populations, communities and ecosystems.' (Chapman & Hall: London)
8. Dzierzon H (2003) Development of methods for characterizing plant and stand architecture and of model comparisons. Institute of Forest Biometry and Informatics, Faculty of Forest Sciences and Forest Ecology, University of Göttingen. Available at http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/diss/2003/dzierzon/ [Verified 4 August 2008]
9. Ford ED, Sorrensen KA (1992) Theory and models of inter-plant competition as a spatial process. In 'Individual-based models and approaches in ecology'. (Eds DL DeAngelis, LJ Gross) pp. 363-407. (Chapman & Hall: New York)
10. Godin C, Sinoquet H (2005) Functional-structural plant modelling. New Phytologist 166, 705-708. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2005.01445.x
11. Hakkila P (1979) 'Wood density survey and dry weight tables for pine, spruce and birch stems in Finland.' (Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae: Helsinki, Finland)
12. Hakkila P (1989) 'Utilization of residual forest biomass.' (Springes-Verlag: Berlin)
13. Hari P, Kellomäki S, Mäkelä A, Ilonen P, Kanninen M, Korpilahti E, Nygrén M (1982) Metsikön varhaiskehityksen dynamiikka. Acta Forestalia Fennica 177, 1-39. [In Finnish, with English summary: Dynamics of early development of tree stand].
14. Hari P, Heikinheimo P, Mäkelä A, Kaipainen L, Korpilahti E, Salmela J (1986) Trees as water transport system. Silva Fennica 20, 205-210.
15. Harper J (1977) 'Population biology of plants.' (Academic Press: London)
16. Host GE, Isebrands JG, Thesseira GW, Kiniry JR, Graham RL (1996) Temporal and spatial scaling from individual trees to plantations: a modeling strategy. Biomass and Bioenergy 11, 233-243. doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(96) 00012-8
17. Host GE, Stech H, Lenz KE, Roskoski K, Mather R, Donahue M (2007) Leaves to landscapes: using high performance computing to assess patch-scale forest response to regional temperature and trace gas gradients. In 'Proceedings of the 5th international workshop on functional-structural plant models'. (Eds P Prusinkiewicz, JHanan, B Lane) pp. 46-1 to 46-4. Available at http://algorithmicbotany.org/FSPM07/proceedings.html [Verified 4 August 2008]
18. Huston MA, DeAngelis D, Post W (1988) New computer models unify ecological theory. Bioscience 38, 682-691. doi: 10.2307/1310870
19. Hynynen J, Ojansuu R, Hökkä H, Siipilehto J, Salminen H, Haapala P (2002) 'Models for predicting stand development in MELA system. Research papers no. 835'. (Finnish Forest Research Institute: Vantaa, Finland).
20. Ishii HT, Tanabe S, Hiura T (2004) Exploring the relationships among canopy structure, stand productivity, and biodiversity of temperate forest ecosystems. Forest Science 50, 342-355.
21. Kaitaniemi P, Ruohomäki K (2006) Uncaged larvae elicit a combination of local and integrated growth responses within mountain birch crown. Oikos 115, 537-548. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0030-1299.14878.x
22. Kangas A (1997) On the prediction bias and variance in long-term growth projections. Forest Ecology and Management 96, 207-216. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00056-X
23. Kellomäki S (1986) A model for the relationship between branch number and biomass in Pinus sylvestris crowns and the effect of crown shape and stand density on branch and stem biomass. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 1, 455-472.
24. Kellomäki S, Väisänen H (1988) Dynamics of branch population in the canopy of young Scots pine stands. Forest Ecology and Management 24, 67-83. doi: 10.1016/0378-1127(88)90025-4
25. King D, Loucks OL (1978) The theory of tree bole and branch form. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics 15, 141-165. doi: 10.1007/BF01323263
26. Körner C (2004) Through enhanced tree dynamics carbon dioxide enrichment may cause tropical forests to lose carbon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society. Biological Sciences 359, 493-498. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1429
27. Kurth W (1997) Growth grammars simulating trees - an extension of L-systems incorporating local variables ans sensitivity. Silva Fennica 31, 285-295.
28. Kurth W (1998) Some new form for modelling the interactions between plant architecture, competition and ca allocation. Bayreuther Forum Ökologie 52, 53-98.
29. Kurttio O, Kellomäki S (1990) Structure of young Pinus sylvestris: branching and its dependence on tree size. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 5, 169-175.
30. Lacointe A (2000) Carbon allocation among tree organs: a review of basic processes and representation in functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Science 57, 521-533. doi: 10.1051/forest:2000139
31. Lehtonen A (2005) Estimating foliage biomass in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) plots. Tree Physiology 25, 803-811.
32. MacDonald N (1983) 'Trees and networks in biological models.' (John Wiley & Sons: Avon)
33. Mäkelä A (1986) Implications of the pipe model theory on dry matter partitioning and height growth in trees. Journal of Theoretical Biology 123, 103-120. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5193(86)80238-7
34. Mäkelä A (1997) A carbon balance model of growth and self-pruning in trees based on structural relationships. Forest Science 43, 7-24.
35. Mäkelä A, Vanninen P (2001) Vertical structure of Scots pine crowns in different age and size classes. Trees 15, 385-392. doi: 10.1007/s004680100118
36. Mäkelä A, Kolari P, Karimäki J, Nikinmaa E, Perämäki M, Hari P (2006) Modelling five years of weather driven variation of GPP in a boreal forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 139, 382-398. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.08.017
37. Mäkinen H, Colin F (1998) Predicting branch angle and branch diameter of Scots pine from usual measurements and stand structural information. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28, 1686-1696. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-28-11-1686
38. Martin MJ, Host GE, Lenz KE, Isebrands JG (2001) Simulating the growth response of aspen to elevated ozone: a mechanistic approach to scaling a leaf-level model of ozone effects on photosynthesis to a complex canopy architecture. Environmental Pollution 115, 425-436. doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00232-9
39. Mech R, Prusinkiewicz P (1996) Visual models of plants interacting with their environment. In 'Computer graphics proceedings, annual conference series, SIGGRAPH 96'. pp. 397-410. (ACM SIGGRAPH: New York)
40. Metz JAJ, Diekmann O (1986) 'The dynamics of physiological structured populations. Lecture Notes in Biomathematics 68'. (Springer-Verlag: Berlin)
41. Nikinmaa E, Messier C, Sievänen R, Perttunen J, Lehtonen M (2003) Shoot growth and crown development: effect of crown position in three-dimensional simulations. Tree Physiology 23, 129-136.
42. Oker-Blom P, Smolander H (1988) The ratio of shoot silhouette area to total needle area in Scots pine. Forest Science 34, 894-906.
43. Oliver CD, Larson BC (1996) 'Forest stand dynamics.' (John Wiley & Sons: New York)
44. Perttunen J, Sievänen R (2005) Incorporating Lindenmayer systems for architectural development in a functional-structural tree model. Ecological Modelling 181, 479-491. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.06.034
45. Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Salminen H, Saarenmaa H, Väkevä J (1996) LIGNUM: A tree model based on simple structural units. Annals of Botany 77, 87-98. doi: 10.1006/anbo.1996.0011
46. Perttunen J, Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E (1998) LIGNUM: A model combining the structure and functioning of trees. Ecological Modelling 108, 189-198. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(98)00028-3
47. Perttunen J, Nikinmaa E, Lechowicz MJ, Sievänen R, Messier C (2001) Application of the functional-structural tree model LIGNUM to sugar maple saplings (Acer saccharum Marsh) growing in forest gaps. Annals of Botany 88, 471-481.
48. Porté A, Bartelink HH (2002) Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecological Modelling 150, 141-180. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00476-8
49. Prentice IC, Bondeau A, Cramer W, Harrison SP, Hickler T, Lucht W, Sitch S, Smith B, Sykes MT (2007) Dynamic global vegetation modelling: quantifying terrestrial ecosystem responses to large-scale environmental change. In 'Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world'. (Eds JP Canadell, D Pataki, LF Pitelka) pp. 175-192. (Springer-Verlag: New York)
50. Room PM, Maillette L, Hanan JS (1994) Module and metamer dynamics and virtual plants. Advances in Ecological Research 25, 105-157. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2504(08)60214-7
51. Ross J (1981) 'The radiation regime and architecture of plant stands'. (Dr W. Junk Publishers: The Hague, The Netherlands).
52. Shinozaki K, Yoda K, Hozumi K, Kira TA (1964) A quantitative analysis of plant form - the pipe model theory. I. Basic analysis. Japanese Journal of Ecology 14, 97-105.
53. Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Perttunen J (1997) Evaluation of importance of sapwood senescence on tree growth using the model LIGNUM. Silva Fennica 31, 329-340.
54. Sievänen R, Nikinmaa E, Nygren P, Ozier-Lafontaine H, Perttunen L, Hakula H (2000) Components of functional-structural tree models. Annals of Forest Science 57, 399-412. doi: 10.1051/forest:2000131
55. Sorrensen-Cothern KA, Ford ED, SprugelDG(1993)Amodel of competition incorporating plasticity through modular foliage and crown development. Ecological Monographs 63, 277-304. doi: 10.2307/2937102
56. Sprugel DG, Hinckley TM, Schaap W (1991) The theory and practice of branch autonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 22, 309-334. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.22.110191.001521
57. Stenberg P (1996) Metsikön rakenne, säteilyolot ja tuotos. University of Helsinki, Department of Forest Ecology Publications no. 15. [in Finnish].
58. Stenberg P, Palmroth S, Bond B, Sprugel DG, Smolander H (2001) Shoot structure and photosynthetic efficiency along the light gradient in a Scots pine canopy. Tree Physiology 21, 805-814.
59. Stoyan D, Kendall WS, Mecke J (1987) 'Stochastic geometry and its applications.' (John Wiley & Sons: New York)
60. Takenaka A (1994) A simulation model of tree architecture development based on growth response to local light environment. Journal of Plant Research 107, 321-330. doi: 10.1007/BF02344260
61. Vanninen P, Ylitalo H, Sievänen R, Mäkelä A (1996) Effects of age and site quality on the distribution of biomass in Scots pine. Trees (Berlin) 10, 231-238.
62. Varmola M (1987) Männyn viljelytaimikoiden kasvumalli. Lic. For&Agric. Thesis, Department of Forest Mensuration, University of Helsinki, 89 p. [in Finnish].
63. Vuokila Y, Väliaho H (1980) Viljeltyjen havumetsiköiden kasvatusmallit. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae 99, 271. [In Finnish with English summary: Growth and yield models for conifer cultures in Finland].