Libraries as distributors of geospatial data: Data management policies as tools for managing partnerships

Library Trends

Volumn 55, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 264-284

  Steinhart, Gail ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33847763582     PISSN: 00242594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/lib.2006.0063     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Baker, J. C. (2004). Mapping the risks: Assessing homeland security implications of publicly available geospatial information. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corp. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from http://www.rand.org/publications/ MG/MG142/MG142.pdf.
2. Barrington Consulting Group. (2005). GeoNOVA exchange agreement template. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://gov.ns.ca/GeoNova/pdf/ GeoNOVA_Exchange_Agreement _template.pdf.
3. Brown, D. L., Welch, G., & Cullingworth, C. (2005). Archiving, management and preservation of geospatial data: Summary report and recommendations. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www. geoconnections.org/programsComrnittees/proCom_policy/keyDocs/ geospatial_data_mgt_summary_report_20050208_E.pdf.
4. Center for International Earth Science Information Network (CIESIN). (2005). Guide to managing geospatial electronic records. New York: Columbia University.
5. Charlevoix County GIS Program. (2004). Charlevoix County intergovernmental digital geographic data sharing agreement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.charlevoixcounty.org/downloads/ chxcounty_data_sharing_agreement.pdf.
6. Cho, G. (2005). Geographic information science: Mastering the legal issues. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons.
7. Committee on Licensing Geographic Data and Services. (2004). Licensing geographic data and services. Washington, DC: National Research Council, Committee on Licensing Geographic Data and Services.
8. Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems. (2002). Reference model for an Open Archival Information System (OAIS). Washington, DC: CCSDS Secretariat. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://ssdoo.gsfc.nasa.gov/nost/ wwwclassic/documents/pdf/CCSDS-650.0-B-1.pdf.
9. County of Hunterdon, New Jersey, Division of Geographic Information Systems, (n.d.). Spatial data distribution agreement. Retrieved November 9, 2005, from http://gis.co.hunterdon.nj.us/hunterdon/Agreement.htm.
10. CUGIR Work Group. (2003). Collection policy: Cornell University Geospatial Information Repository (CUGIR). Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://cugir.mannlib.cornell.edu/CUGIRCollectionPolicy.20030423.pdf.
11. OUGIR Work Group. (2005a). CUGIR data management and distribution polity. Retrieved November 29, 2005, from http://cugir.mannlib.cornell.edu/ CLIGIRpoliey.pdr.
12. OUGIR Work Group. (2005b). Security assessment procedure.: Retrieved November 29.2005. from http://cugir.inannlib.cornell.edu/ CUGIRSecurityAssessmem.pdf.
13. Dangermond, J. (1995). Public data access: Another side of GIS data sharing. In H. J. Onsnid & G. Rushton (Eds.), Sharing geographic information (pp. 331-339). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
14. Dawes, S. S., & Oskam, S. (1999). The Internet, the stale library and the implementation of statewide information policy: The case of the NYS GIS Clearinghouse. Journal of Global Information Management, 7(4), 27-33.
15. de Sherbinin, A., & Chen, R. S. (2005). Global spatial data and information user workshop: Report of a workshop. Retrieved November 27, 2005, from http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/GSDworkshop/GlobalData Workshop_report_web.pdf.
16. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. (ESRI). (n.d.). Geography network participant agreement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.geographynetwork.com/publishing/index, html.
17. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC), (1998). FGDC policy on access to public, information and the protection of personal information privacy in federal geospaticd databases. Retrieved November 26, 2005, from http://www.fgdc.gov/policyandplanning/privacy%20policy.
18. Federal Geographic Data Committee (FGDC). (2000). Content standard for digital geospatial metadata workbook (Version 2.0). Retrieved November 28, 2005, from http://www.fgdc.gov/metadata/documents/workbook_0501_bmk.pdf.
19. Geospatial One-Stop, (n.d.). Responsibilities of a publisher. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://gos2.geodata.gov.
20. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), (n.d.a). Data sharing agreement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.gbif.org/ DataProviders/Agreements/DSA.
21. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). (n.d.b). Data use agreement. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.gbif.org/ DataProviders/Agreements/DUA.
22. Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF). (n.d.c). Guiding principles regarding intellectual property rights. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://www.gbif.org/DataProvidcrs /Agreements/GBlFdataIPRprinciples. html.
23. Governor's Task Force on Information Resources Management Technology. (1997). Governor's Task Force on Information Resources Management Technology policy 97-6. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.oft.state.ny.us/ policy/tp_976.htm.
24. Harvey, F. (2003). Developing geographic information infrastructures for local government: The role of trust. Canadian Geogiapher-Geographe Canadien, 47(1), 28-36.
25. Herold, P. (1997). Maps and legends: Plotting a course for geographic information systems. ReUieved November 28, 2005, from http://www.ala.org/ ala/acrlbucket/nashvillel997pap/herold.htm.
26. Hyland, N. C. (2002). GIS and data sharing in libraries: Considerations for digital libraries. 1NSPEL, 56(3), 207-215.
27. International Organization for Standardization. (2003). Geographic information, metadata (1st ed.). Genève, Switzerland: Iso.
28. Joffe, B. A. (2003). Model data distribution policy. Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http:/ , www.opendataconsortium.org/documents/ Data_Policy-4b.pdf.
29. Longhorn, R. A., Henson Apollonio, V., While,]. W., & International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center. (2002). Legal issues in the use ofgeospalial data and look for agriculture and natural resource management: A primer. Mexico: CIMMYT.
30. Macomb County (MI) GIS Services Division. (2002). Intergovernmental data sharing agreement for Macomb County digital geographic data sets. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http:// macombcountymi.gov/gis/Documents/ intergovernmental_license.pdf.
31. Martindale, J. (2002). National security and access to GIS data via the Internet: The Cornell University Geospatial Information Repository (CUGIR). Proceedings of the Annual ESRI Education User Conference, San Diego, CA. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/edue02/ pap5165/p5165.htm.
32. Masser, I. (2005). GAS worlds: Creating spatial data infrastructures. Redlands, CA: ESRI Press.
33. McGlamery, P. (1995). Libraries as institutions for sharing. In H. J. Onsrud & G. Rushton (Eds.), Sharing geographic information (pp. 319-330). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
34. Meredith, P. H. (l 995). Distributed GIS: If its time is now, why is it resisted? In H. J. Onsrud & G. Rushton (Eds.), Sharing geographic information (pp. 7-21). New Brunswick, NJ: Center for Urban Policy Research.
35. MetroGIS. (2004). Regional parcel data sharing and distribution agreement for public parties between the Metropolitan Council and the counties ofAnoka, Carver, Dakota, Ramsey, Hennepin, Scott, and Washington. Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://www.metrogis.org/about /history/agreement_3rd. pdf.
36. New York State Office of Cyber Security and Critical Infrastructure Coordination. (2005). The New York State Geographic Information Systems (GIS) cooperative data sharing agreement for use with local governments of New York State and not-for-profit entities. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://www.nysgis.state.ny.us/coordinationprogram/cooperative /agreementcfm.
37. North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (CGIA). (n.d.). Memorandum of agreement between Community, North Carolina and Slate of North Carolina Center for Geographic Information and A nalysis (CGIA) to enable and advance the sharing of strategic geospatial data resources and associated documentation between the agencies and among their data users. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://cgia.cgia.state.nc.us/gicc/cdsa/moa. pdf.
38. Office of Management and Budget. (1996). Circular no. A-130-Transmutai Memorandum no. 4. Retrieved November 1, 2005, from http://www.whitehouse. gov/omb/circulars/a130/a130trans4.html.
39. OMB Watch. (2003). NY State confidential memorandum re: agency sensitive information January 17, 2002. Retrieved October 23, 2005, from http://www.ombwatch.org/info/2001 /NYSinventory.html.
40. Onsrud, H. J. (1999). Liability in the use of GIS and geographical datasets. In P. Longley, M. Goodchild, D. Maguire, & D. Rhind (Eds.), Geographical Information Systems: Management issues and applications (pp. 643-652). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
41. Onsrud, H. J., & Lopez, X. R. (1998). Intellectual property rights in disseminating digital geographic data, products, and services: Conflicts and commonalities among European Union and United States approaches. In P. A. Burrough & I. Masser (Eds.), European geographic information infrastructures: Opportunities and pitfalls (pp. 153-167). London: Taylor & Francis.
42. RLG-NARA Task Force on Digital Repository Certification. (2005). An audit checklist for the certification of trusted digital repositories. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group (RLG). Retrieved December 21, 2005, from http://www.rlg.org/en/pdfs/rlgnara-repositorieschecklist.pdf.
43. RLG-OCLC Working Group on Digital Archive Attributes. (2002). Trusted digital repositories: Attributes and responsibilities. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group (RLG). Retrieved November 26, 2005, from www.rlg.org/legacy/longterm/repositories.pdf.
44. Somerset County, New Jersey, (n.d.). Digital data sharing agreement. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://www.opendataconsortium. org/documents/SomersetCo_NJ_DSA _Form.pdf.
45. University of Michigan School of Natural Resources and Environment. (2003). MRI data sharing agreement. Retrieved November 19, 2005, from http://rivers.snre.umich.edu/mri/mrishare.htm.
46. USCGRP Data and Information Working Group. (2002). USGCRP DIWG data guidelines. Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://globalchange.gov/ policies/diwg/diwg-guidelines.html.
47. VanWey, L. K., Rindfuss, R. R., Gutmann, M. P., Entwisle, B., & Balk, D. L. (2005). Confidentiality and spatially explicit data: Concerns and challenges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(43), 15337-15342.
48. Wyoming Geographic Information Advisory Council (WGIAC). (2000). Spatial technology and Geographic Information System policy (Draft). Retrieved November 20, 2005, from http://wgiac2.state.wy.us/files/other/revised. pdf.
49. Zimmerman, C. A. (2002). Sharing data for public information: Practices and policies of public agencies. Retrieved November 13, 2005, from http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Travel/DatShare.htm.