Exploring publishing patterns at a large research university: Implications for library practice

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 3 A, 2012, Pages 32-50

  Amos, Kathleen ^a   Mower, Allyson ^b   James, Mary Ann ^b   Weber, Alice ^c   Yaffe, Joanne ^b   Youngkin, Mary ^c  

^a Public Health Foundation   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870324899     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1715720X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.18438/b86311     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Battin, P. (1980). Research libraries in the network environment: The case for cooperation. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 6(2), 68-73. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ225890
2. Bergman, S. S. (2006). The scholarly communication movement: Highlights and recent developments. Collection Building, 25(4), 108-128. doi:10.1108/01604950610705989
3. Borgman, C. L. (Ed.). (1990). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications.
4. Byrd, G. D. (1990). An economic "commons" tragedy for research libraries: Scholarly journal publishing and pricing trends. College & Research Libraries, 51(3), 184-195. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ412093
5. Byrd, G. D. (1999). Medical faculty use of thejournal literature, publishing productivity and the size of health sciences library journal collections. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 87(3), 312-321. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226591/
6. Dhawan, S. M., Phull, S.K., & Jain, P, (1980). Documentation notes: Selection of scientific journals: A model. Journal of Documentation, 36(1), 24-32. doi:10.1108/eb026689
7. Dykeman, A. (1994). Faculty citations: An approach to assessing the impact of diminishing resources on scientific research. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 18(2), 137-146. doi:10.1016/0364-6408(94)90021-3
8. Hughes, J. (1995). Use of faculty publication lists and ISI citation data to identify a core list of journals with local importance. Library Acquisitions: Practice & Theory, 19(4), 403-413. doi:10.1016/0364-6408(95)00055-E
9. Jackson, M. E. (2003). Assessing ILL/DD services study: Initial observations. ARL: A bimonthly report, 230/231, 21-22. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/illdd.pdf
10. LaBonte, K. B. (2005). Citation analysis: A method for collection development for a rapidly developing field. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 43. Retrieved 17 Aug. 2012 from http://www.istl.org/05-summer/refereed.html
11. Lascar, C., &Mendelsohn, L. D. (2001). An analysis of journal use by structural biologists with applications for journal collection development decisions. College & Research Libraries, 62(5), 422-433. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://crl.acrl.org/content/62/5/422.short
12. Malenfant, K. J. (2010). Leading change in the system of scholarly communication: A case study of engaging liaison librarians for outreach to faculty. College & Research Libraries, 71(1), 63-76. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://crl.acrl.org/content/71/1/63.short
13. Odlyzko, A. (1997). The economics of electronic journals. First Monday, 2(8). Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://firstmonday.org/article/view/542/463
14. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A manifesto. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://altmetrics.org
15. Reitz, J. M. (2004-2012). ODLIS: Online dictionary for library and information science. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://www.abc-clio.com/ODLIS/odlis_c.aspx
16. Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., & Huntington, P. (2004). Scholarly communication in the digital environment: What do authors want? Learned Publishing, 17, 261-273. doi: 10.1087/0953151042321680
17. Salisbury, L., & Bajwa, V. (2004). Facultypublications as a source of information for identifying and satisfying users' needs: A case study at the University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Journal of Agricultural & Food Information, 5(3), 11-25. doi:10.1300/J108v05n03_04
18. Salisbury, L., & Smith, J. S. (2010). The use of Web of Knowledge to study publishing and citation use for local researchers at the campus level. Collection Management, 35(2), 69-82. doi:10.1080/01462671003597959
19. Satariano, W. A. (1978). Journal use in sociology: Citation analysis versus readership patterns. Library Quarterly, 48(3), 293-300. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ194533
20. Schauder, D. (1994). Electronic publishing of professional articles: Attitudes of academics and implications for the scholarly communication industry. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(2), 73-100. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199403)45:2<73::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-5
21. Shaughnessy, T. W. (1989). Scholarly communication: The need for anagenda for action-a symposium. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15(2), 68-78. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ394039
22. Tenopir, C., & King, D. W. (1997). Trends in scientific scholarly journal publishing in the United States. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 28(3), 135-170. doi:10.3138/JSP-028-03-135
23. Tenopir, C., & King, D. (2000). Towards electronic journals: Realities for scientists, librarians, and publishers. Washington, D.C.: Special Libraries Association.
24. Vieira, D., & Faraino, R. (1997). Analyzing the research record of an institution's list of faculty publications. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 85(2), 154-157. Retrieved 20 Aug. 2012 from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC226243/
25. Wilson, C. S. & Tenopir, C. (2008). Local citation analysis, publishing and reading patterns: Using multiple methods to evaluate faculty use of an academic library's research collection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(9), 1393-1408. doi:10.1002/asi.20812