Geographic variation in the greater Japanese shrew-mole, Urotrichus talpoides: Combining morphological and chromosomal patterns

Mammalian Biology

Volumn 78, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 267-275

  Wilson, Laura A B ^a  

^a KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cranium; Dentary; Geometric morphometrics; Honshu; Karyotype race

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME; CRANIUM; DATA SET; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; GEOMETRY; INTRASPECIFIC INTERACTION; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; SMALL MAMMAL;

JAPAN;

INSECTIVORA; MAMMALIA; TALPIDAE; UROTRICHUS TALPOIDES;

EID: 84878440342     PISSN: 16165047     EISSN: 16181476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.mambio.2012.09.003     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Adams D.C., Rohlf F.J., Slice D.E. Geometric morphometrics: ten years of progress following the 'revolution'. Ital. J. Zool. 2004, 71:5-16.
2. Anders U., von Koenigswald W., Ruf I., Smith B.H. Generalized individual dental ages for fossil and extant placental mammals. Paläontol. Z. 2011, 85:321-339.
3. Arnqvist G., Martensson T. Measurement error in geometric morphometrics: empirical strategies to assess and reduce its impact on measures of shape. Acta Zool. Hung. 1998, 44:73-96.
4. Badyaev A.V., Foresman K.R., Young R.L. Evolution of morphological integration: developmental accommodation of stress-induced variation. Am. Nat. 2005, 166:382-395.
5. Barrow E., MacLeod N. Shape variation in the mole dentary. Zoo. J. Linn. Soc. 2008, 153:187-211.
6. Bookstein F.L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data 1991, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Caumul R., Polly P.D. Phylogenetic and environmental components of morphological variation: skull, dentary, and molar shape in marmots (Marmota, Rodentia). Evolution 2005, 59(11):2460-2472.
8. Cheverud J.M., Hartman S.E., Richtsmeier J.T., Atchley W.R. A quantitative genetic analysis of localized morphology in dentarys of inbred mice using finite-element scaling analysis. J. Craniofac. Genet. Dev. Biol. 1991, 11:122-137.
9. Dryden I.L., Mardia K.V. Statistical Shape Analysis 1998, Wiley, New York.
10. Enlow D.H. Principles of Bone Remodeling 1963, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL.
11. Fernandes F.A., Fornel R., Cordeiro-Estrela P., Freitas T.R.O. Intra- and interspecific skull variation in two sister species of the subterranean rodent genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Ctenomyidae): coupling geometric morphometrics and chromosomal polymorphism. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2009, 155:220-237.
12. Fornel R., Cordeiro-Estrela P., De Freitas T.R.O. Skull shape and size variation in Ctenomys minutus (Rodentia: Ctenomyidae) in geographical, chromosomal polymorphism, and environmental contexts. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2010, 101:705-720.
13. Gould S.J., Johnston R.F. Geographic variation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1972, 3:457-498.
14. Hall B.K. Bones and Cartilage: Developmental and Evolutionary Skeletal Biology 2005, Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam.
15. Hall B.K., Herring S.W. Paralysis and growth of the musculoskeletal system in the embryonic chick. J. Morphol. 1990, 206:45-56.
16. Harada M., Ando A., Kimiyuki T., Koyasu K. Geographical variations in chromosomes of the greater Japanese shrew-mole Urotrichus talpoides (Mammalia: Insectivora). Zool. Sci. 2001, 18(3):433-442.
17. Imaizumi Y. The Handbook of Japanese Land Mammals 1970, vol. I. Shinshichosha, Tokyo, (in Japanese).
18. Jayat J.P., Ortíz P.E., Salazar-Bravo J., Pardiñas U.F.J., D'Elía G. The Akodon boliviensis species group (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Sigmodontinae) in Argentina: species limits and distribution, with the description of a new entity. Zootaxa 2010, 2409:1-61.
19. Kawada S., Obara Y. Reconsideration of the karyological relationship between two Japanese species of shrew-moles, Dymecodon pilirostris and Urotrichus talpoides. Zool. Sci. 1999, 16(1):167-174.
20. Kawada S., Harada M., Obara Y., Kobayashi S., Koyasu K., Oda S. Karyosystematic analysis of Japanese talpine moles in the genera Euroscaptor and Mogera (Insectivora, Talpidae). Zool. Sci. 2001, 18:1003-1010.
21. Klingenberg C.P. Integration, modules and development: molecules to morphology to evolution. Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes 2004, 213-230. Oxford University Press, New York. M. Pigliucci, K. Preston (Eds.).
22. Klingenberg C.P. MorphoJ: an integrated software package for geometric morphometrics. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 2011, 11:353-357.
23. Klingenberg C.P., Leamy L.J., Cheverud J.M. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse dentary. Genetics 2004, 166:1909-1921.
24. Krieger J.D., Guralnick R.P., Smith D.M. Generating empirically determined continuous measures of leaf shape for paleoclimate reconstruction. Palaois 2007, 22(2):212-219.
25. Kryštufek B., Griffiths H.I. Cranial differentiation in Neomys water shrews. Folia Zool. 2000, 49(2):81-87.
26. Lanyon L.E. Functional strain as a determinant for bone remodeling. Calcif. Tissue Int. 1984, 53:S102-S107.
27. Loy A., Capanna E. A parapatric contact area between two species of moles: character displacement investigated through the geometric morphometrics of skull. Acta Zool. Hung. 1998, 44(1-2):151-164.
28. MacLeod N. Generalizing and extending the eigenshape method of shape space visualization and analysis. Paleobiology 1999, 25:107-138.
29. Mora M., Olivares A.I., Vassallo A.I. Size, shape and structural versatility of the skull of the subterranean rodent Ctenomys (Rodentia, Caviomorpha): functional and morphological analysis. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2003, 78:85-96.
30. Moreira J.C., de Oliveira J.A. Evaluating diversification hypotheses in the South American cricetid Thaptomys nigrita (Lichtenstein, 1829) (Rodentia: Sigmodontinae): an appraisal of geographical variation based on different character systems. J. Mammal. Evol. 2011, 18:201-214.
31. Motokawa M. Phylogenetic relationships within the family Talpidae (Mammalia: Insectivora). J. Zool. Lond. 2004, 263:147-157.
32. Muñoz- Muñoz F., Sans-Fuentes M.A., López-Fuster M.J., Ventura J. Evolutionary modularity of the mouse dentary: dissecting the effect of chromosomal reorganizations and isolation by distance in a Robertsonian system of Mus musculus domesticus. J. Evol. Biol. 2011, 24:1763-1776.
33. Olson L.E., Goodman S.M., Yoder A.D. Illumination of cryptic species boundaries in long-tailed shrew tenrecs (Mammalia: Tenrecidae; Mircrogale), with new insights into geographic variation and distributional constraints. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2004, 83:1-22.
34. Polly P.D. Paleophylogeography: the tempo of geographic differentiation in marmots (Marmota). J. Mammal. 2003, 84(2):369-384.
35. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2008, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
36. Rieseberg L.H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:351-358.
37. Rohlf F.J. tpsDig Version 2.16 2010, Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook.
38. Rot-Nikcevic I., Downing K.J., Hall B.K., Kablar B. Development of the mouse mandibles and clavicles in the absences of skeletal myogenesis. Histol. Histopathol. 2007, 22(1):51-60.
39. Sánchez-Villagra M.R., Horovitz I., Motokawa M. A comprehensive morphological analysis of talpid moles (Mammalia) phylogenetic relationships. Cladistics 2006, 22:59-88.
40. Simon H.A. The architecture of complexity. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 1962, 106(6):467-482.
41. Sites J.W., Crandall K.A. Testing species boundaries in biodiversity studies. Conserv. Biol. 1997, 11(6):1289-1297.
42. Tsuchiya K. Cytotaxonomic studies of the family Talpidae from Japan. Honyurui Kagaku 1988, 28:49-61. (in Japanese).
43. von Cramon-Taubadel N., Frazier B.C., Lahr M.M. The problem of assessing landmark error in geometric morphometrics: theory, methods, and modifications. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 2007, 134:24-35.
44. White M.J.D. Modes of Speciation 1978, Freeman WH, Co, San Francisco.
45. Wilson L.A., MacLeod N., Humphrey L.T. Morphometric criteria for sexing juvenile human skeletons using the ilium. J. Forensic Sci. 2008, 53(2):269-278.
46. Wilson L.A.B., Sánchez-Villagra M.R. Diversity trends and their ontogenetic basis: an exploration of allometric disparity in rodents. Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. B: Biol. 2010, 277:1227-1234.
47. Wilson L.A.B., Cardoso H.F.V., Humphrey L.T. On the reliability of a geometric morphometric approach to sex determination: a blind test of six criteria of the juvenile ilium. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011, 206:35-42.
48. Young R.L., Haselkorn T.S., Badyaev A.V. Functional equivalence of morphologies enables morphological and ecological diversity. Evolution 2007, 61:2480-2492.
49. Zahn C.T., Roskies R.Z. Fourier shape descriptors for closed plane curves. IEEE Trans. Comput. 1972, C-21:269-281.