Highlights, disparity, and perceived gloss with convex and concave surfaces

Journal of Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2013, Pages

  Kerrigan, Iona S ^a   Adams, Wendy J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

3D surface and shape perception; Binocular vision; Crossmodal perception; Gloss and specular highlights; Material perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BINOCULAR VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIGHT; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISION, BINOCULAR;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84878405663     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/13.1.9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Adams, W. J., Graf, E. W., & Ernst, M. O. (2004). Experience can change the "light-from-above" prior. Nature Neuroscience, 7(10), 1057-1058.
2. Anderson, B. L. (2011). Visual perception of materials and surfaces. Current Biology, 21(24), R978-R983.
3. Anderson, B. L., & Kim, J. (2009). Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 9(11):10, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/11/10, doi:10.1167/9.11.10. [PubMed] [Article]
4. Beck, J., & Prazdny, S. (1981). Highlights and the perception of glossiness. Perception & Psychophysics, 30(4), 407-410.
5. Blake, A., & Bülthoff, H. (1990). Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature, 343, 165- 168.
6. Blake, A., & Bülthoff, H. (1991). Shape from specularities: Computation and psychophysics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 331, 237-252.
7. Bouzit, S., Adams, W., & Graf, E. (2007). Combining specular and diffuse lighting to recover 3-D shape. Perception ECVP Abstract Supplement, 36.
8. Doerschner, K., Fleming, R. W., Yilmaz, O., Schrater, P. R., Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2011). Visual motion and the perception of surface material. Current Biology, 21, 2010-2016.
9. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433.
10. Fleming, R. W., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2005). Low-level image cues in the perception of translucent materials. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(3), 346-382.
11. Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., & Adelson, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5):3, 347-368, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/3/5/3, doi:10.1167/3.5.3. [PubMed] [Article]
12. Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., & Adelson, E. H. (2004). Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision, 4(9):10, 798-820, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/4/9/10, doi:10.1167/4. 9.10. [PubMed] [Article]
13. Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing shiny from matte. Journal of Vision, 2(7): 551, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/2/7/551, doi:10.1167/2.7.551. [Abstract]
14. Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2003). How does the perception of shape interact with the perception of shiny material. Journal of Vision, 3(9): 59, http:// www.journalofvision.org/content/3/9/59, doi:10. 1167/3.9.59. [Abstract] http://www.journalofvision.org/content/2/7/551, doi:10.1167/2.7.551. [Abstract]
15. Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2003). How does the perception of shape interact with the perception of shiny material. Journal of Vision, 3(9): 59, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/9/59, doi:10.1167/3.9.59. [Abstract]
16. Helbig, H. B., & Ernst, M. O. (2007). Optimal integration of shape information from vision and touch. Experimental Brain Research, 179, 595-606.
17. Kerrigan, I. S., Adams, W. J., & Graf, E. W. (2010). Does it feel shiny? Haptic cues affect perceived gloss. Journal of Vision, 10(7): 868, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/10/7/868, doi:10.1167/ 10.7.868. [Abstract]
18. Kim, J., Marlow, P., & Anderson, B. L. (2011). The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading. Journal of Vision, 11(9): 4, 1-19, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/9/4, doi:10.1167/11.9.4. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Kleffner, D. A., & Ramachandran, V. S. (1992). On the perception of shape from shading. Perception & Psychophysics, 52(1), 18-36.
20. Langer, M. S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2001). A prior for global convexity in local shape-from-shading. Perception, 30(4), 403-410.
21. Longuet-Higgins, M. S. (1960). Reflection and refraction at a random moving surface. I. Patterns and paths of specular points. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 50(9), 838-844.
22. Marlow, P., Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2011). The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. Journal of Vision, 11(9): 16, 1-12, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/ 11/9/16, doi:10.1167/11.9.16. [PubMed] [Article]
23. Marlow, P. J., Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2012). The perception and misperception of specular surface reflectance. Current Biology, 22, 1909-1913.
24. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447, 206-209.
25. Mulligan, J. B. (1993). Nonlinear combination rules and the perception of visual motion transparency. Vision Research, 33(14), 2021-2030.
26. Muryy, A. A., Fleming, R. W., Welchman, A. E. (2012). Binocular cues for glossiness. Journal of Vision, 12(9): 869, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/12/9/869, doi:10.1167/12.9.869. [Abstract]
27. Nishida, S., Motoyoshi, I., Nakano, L., Li, Y., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. (2008). Do colored highlights look like highlights? Journal of Vision, 8(6): 339, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/6/339, doi:10.1167/8.6.339. [Abstract]
28. Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J. A., & Greenberg, D. P. (2000). Toward a psychophysically-based light reflection model for image synthesis. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 55-64.
29. Phong, B. T. (1975). Illumination for computer generated pictures. Communications of the ACM, 18(6), 311-317.
30. Sakano, Y., & Ando, H. (2010). Effects of head motion and stereo viewing on perceived glossiness. Journal of Vision, 10(9):15, 1-14, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/15, doi:10.1167/10.9.15. [PubMed] [Article]
31. van Doorn, A. J., Koenderink, J. J., & Wagemans, J. (2011). Light fields and shape from shading. Journal of Vision, 11(3):21, 1-21, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/11/3/21, doi:10.1167/ 11.3.21. [PubMed] [Article]
32. Wendt, G., Faul, F., Ekroll, V., & Mausfeld, R. (2010). Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. Journal of Vision, 10(9):7, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/10/9/7, doi:10.1167/10.9.7. [PubMed] [Article]
33. Wendt, G., Faul, F., & Mausfeld, R. (2008). Highlight disparity contributes to the authenticity and strength of perceived glossiness. Journal of Vision, 8(1):14, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/8/1/14, doi:10.1167/8.1.14. [PubMed] [Article]
34. Wijntjes, M. W. A., Volcic, R., Pont, S. C., Koenderink, J. J., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009). Haptic perception disambiguates visual perception of 3D shape. Experimental Brain Research, 193, 639-644.