The perception of gloss depends on highlight congruence with surface shading

Journal of Vision

Volumn 11, Issue 9, 2011, Pages 1-19

  Kim, Juno ^a   Marlow, Phillip ^a   Anderson, Barton L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

3D surface and shape perception; Gloss; Shading; Texture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HUMAN; ILLUMINATION; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURFACE PROPERTY;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; LIGHTING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

EID: 80054679656     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/11.9.4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson, B. L., & Kim, J. (2009). Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 9(11):10, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/11/10, doi:10.1167/9.11.10.
2. Beck, J., & Prazdny, K. (1981). Highlights and the perception of glossiness. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 407-410.
3. Ben-Shahar, O., & Zucker, S. (2001). On the perceptual organization of texture and shading flows: From a geometrical model to coherence computation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1048-1055). Kauaii, HI.
4. Blake, A., & Bülthoff, H. (1990). Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature, 343, 165-168.
5. Breton, P., & Zucker, S. W. (1996). Shadows and shading flow fields. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 782-789). San Francisco, CA.
6. Debevec, P. (2002). Image-based lighting. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 22, 26-34.
7. Doerschner, K., Kersten, D., & Schrater, P. R. (2011). Rapid classification of surface reflectance from image velocities. Pattern Recognition, 44, 1874-1884.
8. Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., & Adelson, E. H. (2004). Specular reflections and the perception of shape. Journal of Vision, 4(9):10, 798-820, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/9/10, doi:10.1167/ 4.9.10.
9. Fleming, R. W., Torralba, A., & Adelson, E. H. (in press). Shape from sheen. In Q. Zaidi (Ed.), Three
10. Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing shiny from matte [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2(7):551, 551a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/2/7/551, doi:10.1167/2.7.551.
11. Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2010). Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 10(9):3, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/3, doi:10.1167/10.9.3.
12. Koenderink, J. J., & van Doorn, A. J. (1980). Photometric invariants related to solid shape. Optica Acta, 27, 981-996.
13. Marlow, P., Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (in press). The role of brightness and orientation congruence in the perception of surface gloss. Journal of Vision.
14. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447, 206-209.
15. Sharan, L., Li, Y., Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., & Adelson, E. H. (2008). Image statistics for surface reflectance perception. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 25, 846-865.
16. Todd, J. T., Norman, J. F., & Mingolla, E. (2004). Lightness constancy in the presence of specular highlights. Psychological Science, 15, 33-39.
17. Ward, G. J. (1994). The RADIANCE lighting simulation and rendering system. Computer Graphics, 28, 459-472.
18. Wendt, G., Faul, F., Ekroll, V., & Mausfeld, R. (2010). Disparity, motion, and color information improve gloss constancy performance. Journal of Vision, 10(9):7, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/7, doi:10.1167/10.9.7.