Effects of head motion and stereo viewing on perceived glossiness

Journal of Vision

Volumn 10, Issue 9, 2010, Pages

  Sakano, Yuichi ^a   Ando, Hiroshi ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^b ADVANCED TELECOMMUNICATIONS RESEARCH INSTITUTE INTERNATIONAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Binocular vision; Gloss perception; head motion; Material perception; Stereo vision; Surface properties

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BINOCULAR VISION; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEAD MOVEMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; SURFACE PROPERTY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VISUAL FIELD;

CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; HEAD MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETINA; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VISION, BINOCULAR; VISUAL FIELDS;

EID: 79952649604     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/10.9.15     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Anderson, B. L., & Kim, J. (2009). Image statistics do not explain the perception of gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 9(11):10, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/ content/9/11/10, doi:10.1167/9.11.10. [PubMed] [Article]
2. Anstis, S. M. (2000). Monocular lustre from flicker. Vision Research, 40, 2551-2556.
3. ASTM D523-08 (2008). Standard test method for specular gloss. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
4. Beck, J., & Prazdny, S. (1981). Highlights and the perception of glossiness. Perception & Psychophysics, 30, 407-410.
5. Berzhanskaya, J., Swaminathan, G., Beck, J., & Mingolla, E. (2005). Remote effects of highlights on gloss perception. Perception, 34, 565-575.
6. Blake, A., & Bulthoff, H. (1990). Does the brain know the physics of specular reflection? Nature, 343, 165-168.
7. Bloj, M., Ripamonti, C., Mitha, K., Hauck, R., Greenwald, S., & Brainard, D. H. (2004). An equivalent illumi-nant model for the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness. Journal of Vision, 4(9):6, 735-746, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/9/6, doi:10.1167/4.9.6. [PubMed] [Article]
8. Boyaci, H., Maloney, L. T., & Hersh, S. (2003). The effect of perceived surface orientation on perceived surface albedo in binocularly viewed scenes. Journal of Vision, 3(8):2, 541-553, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/8/2, doi:10.1167/3.8.2. [PubMed] [Article]
9. Brewster, D. (1852). Examination of Dove's theory of lustre. Athenaeum, 1041.
10. Brewster, D. (1855). On the binocular vision of surfaces of different colours. Report of British Association, 2, 9.
11. Brewster, D. (1861). On binocular lustre. Report of British Association, 2, 29-31.
12. Burr, D. C., Ross, J., & Morrone, M. C. (1986). A spatial illusion from motion rivalry. Perception, 15, 59-66.
13. DeAngelis, G. C., Cumming, B. G., & Newsome, W. T. (1998). Cortical area MT and the perception of stereoscopic depth. Nature, 394, 677-680.
14. Doerschner, K., Boyaci, H., & Maloney, L. T. (2010). Estimating the glossiness transfer function induced by illumination change and testing its transitivity. Journal of Vision, 10(4):8, 1-9, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/10/4/8, doi:10.1167/10.4.8. [PubMed] [Article]
15. Dove, H. W. (1850). Ueber die Ursachen des Glanzes und der Irradiation, abgeleitet aus chromatischen Versu-chen mit dem Stereoskop. Poggendorffs Annalen, 83, 169-183.
16. Dror, R. O., Adelson, E. H., & Willsky, A. S. (2001). Surface reflectance estimation and natural illumination statistics. In Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Statistical and Computational Theories of Vision. Vancouver, Canada.
17. Ferwerda, J. A., Pellacini, F., & Greenberg, D. P. (2001). A psychophysically based model of surface gloss perception. Proceedings of SPIE, 4299, 291-301.
18. Fleming, R. W., Dror, R. O., & Adelson, E. H. (2003). Real-world illumination and the perception of surface reflectance properties. Journal of Vision, 3(5):3, 347-368, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/3/5/3, doi:10.1167.3.5.3. [PubMed] [Article]
19. Gilchrist, A. L. (1977). Perceived lightness depends on perceived spatial arrangement. Science, 195, 185-187.
20. Gilchrist, A., Kossyfidis, C., Bonato, F., Agostini, T., Cataliotti, J., Li, X., et al. (1999). An anchoring theory of lightness perception. Psychological Review, 106, 795-834.
21. Hartung, B., & Kersten, D. (2002). Distinguishing shiny from matte [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 2(7):551, 551a, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/2/7/551, doi:10.1167/2.7.551.
22. Helmholtz, H. (2005). Treatise on physiological optics. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications. (Original work published 1867)
23. Hering, E. (1964). Outlines of a theory of the light sense. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1874)
24. Howard, I. P. (1995). Depth from binocular rivalry without spatial disparity. Perception, 24, 67-74.
25. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (1995). Binocular vision and stereopsis. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Howard, I. P., & Rogers, B. J. (2002). Seeing in depth. Thornhill, ON: I. Porteous.
27. Hunter, R. S., & Harold, R. W. (1987). The measurement of appearance (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
28. Hurlbert, A. C., Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1991a). Constraints of specularity motion on glossiness and shape perception. Paper presented at the ECVP 1991.
29. Hurlbert, A. C., Cumming, B. G., & Parker, A. J. (1991b). Recognition and perceptual use of specular reflections. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 32, 105.
30. Kim, J., & Anderson, B. L. (2010). Image statistics and the perception of surface gloss and lightness. Journal of Vision, 10(9):3, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/3, doi:10.1167/10.9.3. [PubMed] [Article]
31. Landy, M. S., Maloney, L. T., Johnston, E. B., & Young, M. (1995). Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: In defense of weak fusion. Vision Research, 35, 389-412.
32. Ludwig, I., Pieper, W., & Lachnit, H. (2007). Temporal integration of monocular images separated in time: Stereopsis, stereoacuity, and binocular luster. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 92-102.
33. Maloney, L. T., & Landy, M. S. (1989). A statistical framework for robust fusion of depth information. In W. A. Pearlman (Ed.), Visual communications and image processing: IV. Proceedings of the SPIE (vol. 1199, pp. 1154-1163). Bellingham: SPIE-International Society for Optical Engineering.
34. Motoyoshi, I., Nishida, S., Sharan, L., & Adelson, E. H. (2007). Image statistics and the perception of surface qualities. Nature, 447, 206-209.
35. Nadler, J. W., Angelaki, D. E., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2008). A neural representation of depth from motion parallax in macaque visual cortex. Nature, 452, 642-645.
36. Nagata, M., Okajima, K., & Osumi, M. (2007). Quantification of gloss perception as a function of stimulus duration. Optical Review, 14, 406-410.
37. Nishida, S., & Shinya, M. (1998). Use of image-based information in judgments of surface-reflectance properties. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 15, 2951-2965.
38. Obein, G., Knoblauch, K., & Vienot, F. (2004). Difference scaling of gloss: Nonlinearity, binocularity, and constancy. Journal of Vision, 4(9):4, 711-720, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/4/9/4, doi:10.1167/4.9.4. [PubMed] [Article]
39. Obein, G., Pichereau, T., Harrar, M., Monot, A., Knoblauch, K., & Vienot, F. (2004). Does binocular vision contribute to gloss perception? [Abstract]. Journal of Vision, 4(11):73, 73a, http://www.journalofvision. org/content/4/11/73, doi:10.1167/4.11.73.
40. Olkkonen, M., & Brainard, D. H. (2010). Perceived glossiness and lightness under real-world illumination. Journal of Vision, 10(9):5, 1-19, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/9/5, doi:10.1167/10.9.5. [PubMed] [Article]
41. Paille, D., Monot, A., Dumont-Becle, P., & Kemeny, A. (2001). Luminance binocular disparity for 3D surface simulation. Proceedings of SPIE, 4299, 622-633.
42. Pellacini, F., Ferwerda, J. A., & Greenberg, D. P. (2000). Toward a psychophysically based light reflection model for image synthesis. Computer Graphics, 34, 55-64.
43. Phong, B. T. (1975). Illumination for computer generated pictures. Communications of the ACM, 18, 311-317.
44. Pieper, W., & Ludwig, I. (2001). Binocular vision: Rivalry, stereoscopic lustre, and sieve effect. Perception, 30, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
45. Pieper, W., & Ludwig, I. (2002). The minimum luminance-contrast requirements for stereoscopic lustre. Perception, 31, ECVP Abstract Supplement.
46. Preston, J. M. (1931). Theories of lustre. Journal of the Society of Dyers and Colourists, 47, 136-143.
47. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1979). Motion parallax as an independent cue for depth perception. Perception, 8, 125-134.
48. Rogers, B., & Graham, M. (1982). Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception. Vision Research, 22, 261-270.
49. Rutherford, M. D., & Brainard, D. H. (2002). Lightness constancy: A direct test of the illumination-estimation hypothesis. Psychological Science, 13, 142-149.
50. Snyder, J. L., Doerschner, K., & Maloney, L. T. (2005). Illumination estimation in three-dimensional scenes with and without specular cues. Journal of Vision,5(10):8, 863-877, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/5/10/8, doi:10.1167/5.10.8. [PubMed] [Article]
51. Stiles, W. S. (1959). Color vision: The approach through increment threshold sensitivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 45, 100-114.
52. Tyler, C. W. (2004). Binocular vision. In W. Tasman & E. A. Jaeger (Eds.), Duane's foundations of clinical ophthalmology (vol. 2, pp. 1-29). Philadelphia, PA: J.B. Lippincott Co.
53. Uka, T., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2003). Contribution of middle temporal area to coarse depth discrimination: Comparison of neuronal and psychophysical sensitivity. Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 3515-3530.
54. Uka, T., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2004). Contribution of area MT to stereoscopic depth perception: Choice-related response modulations reflect task strategy. Neuron, 42, 297-310.
55. Uka, T., & DeAngelis, G. C. (2006). Linking neural representation to function in stereoscopic depth perception: Roles of the middle temporal area in coarse versus fine disparity discrimination. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 6791-6802.
56. Wendt, G., Faul, F., & Mausfeld, R. (2008). Highlight disparity contributes to the authenticity and strength of perceived glossiness. Journal of Vision, 8(1):14, 1-10, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/8/1/14, doi:10.1167/8.1.14. [PubMed] [Article]
57. Wheatstone, C. (1838). On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 128, 371-394.