The relation between gaze behavior and categorization: Does where we look determine what we see?

Journal of Vision

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Hartendorp, Mijke O ^a,b   Van der Stigchel, Stefan ^a   Hooge, Ignace ^a   Mostert, Jeanette ^a   de Boer, Tanja ^a   Postma, Albert ^a,c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INCAS ^*  (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Eye movements; Morphed figures; Visual object categorization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; EYE FIXATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MORPHED FIGURES; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISUAL OBJECT CATEGORIZATION;

EYE MOVEMENTS; MORPHED FIGURES; VISUAL OBJECT CATEGORIZATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878372162     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/13.6.6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bar, M. (2003). A cortical mechanism for triggering top-down facilitation in visual object recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15(4), 600-609.
2. Cerf, M., Frady, E. P., & Koch, C. (2009). Faces and text attract gaze independent of the task: Experimental data and computer model. Journal of Vision, 9(12):10, 1-15, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/9/12/10, doi:10.1167/9.12.10. [PubMed] [Article]
3. Chelnokova, O., & Laeng, B. (2011). Three-dimensional information in face recognition: An eyetracking study. Journal of Vision, 11(13):27, 1-15, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/13/27, doi:10.1167/11.13.27. [PubMed] [Article]
4. Crouzet, S. M., Kirchner, H., & Thorpe, S. J. (2010). Fast saccades toward faces: Face detection in just 100 ms. Journal of Vision, 10(4):16, 1-17, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/10/4/16, doi:10. 1167/10.4.16. [PubMed] [Article]
5. De Winter, J., & Wagemans, J. (2004). Contour-based object identification and segmentation: Stimuli, norms and data, and software tools. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4), 604-624.
6. Downing, P. E., Bray, D., Rogers, J., & Childs, C. (2004). Bodies capture attention when nothing is expected. Cognition, 93, B27-B38.
7. Drewes, J., Trommershäuser, J., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011). Parallel visual search and rapid animal detection in natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 11(2): 20, 1-21, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/2/20, doi:10.1167/11.2.20. [PubMed] [Article]
8. Ellis, S. R., & Stark, L. (1978). Eye movements during the viewing of Necker cubes. Perception, 7, 575- 581.
9. Fei-Fei, L., Iyer, A., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2007). What do we perceive in a glance of a real-world scene? Journal of Vision, 7(1):10, 1-29, http://www. journalofvision.org/content/7/1/10, doi:10.1167/7. 1.10. [PubMed] [Article]
10. Georgiades, M. S., & Harris, J. P. (1997). Biasing effects in ambiguous figures: Removal or fixation of critical features can affect perception. Visual Cognition, 4(4), 383-408.
11. Greene, M. R., & Oliva, A. (2009). The briefest of glances: The time course of natural scene understanding. Psychological Science, 20, 464-472.
12. Harnad, S. (1987). Introduction: Psychophysical and cognitive aspects of categorical perception: A critical overview. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception: The groundwork of cognition (pp. 1-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Hartendorp, M. O., Van der Stigchel, S., Burnett, H. G., Jellema, T., Eilers, P. H. C., & Postma, A. (2010). Categorical perception of morphed objects using a free-naming experiment. Visual Cognition, 18(9), 1320-1347.
14. Hunnius, S., & Bekkering, H. (2010). The early development of object knowledge: A study of infants' visual anticipations during action observation. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 446-454.
15. Judd, T., Durand, F., & Torralba, A. (2011). Fixations on low-resolution images. Journal of Vision, 11(4): 14, 1-20, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/4/14, doi:10.1167/11.4.14. [PubMed] [Article]
16. Kovic, V., Plunkett, K., & Westermann, G. (2009). Eye-tracking study of animate objects. Psihologija, 42(3), 307-327.
17. Land, M., Mennie, N., & Rusted, J. (1999). The roles of vision and eye movements in the control of activities of daily living. Perception, 28, 1311-1328.
18. Newell, F. N., & Bülthoff, H. H. (2002). Categorical perception of familiar objects. Cognition, 85, 113- 143.
19. Poncet, M., Reddy, L., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2012). A need for more information uptake but not focused attention to access basic-level representations. Journal of Vision, 12(1):15, 1-16, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/12/1/15, doi:10.1167/ 12.1.15. [PubMed] [Article]
20. Sæther, L., Van Belle, W., Laeng, B., Brennen, T., & Øvervoll, M. (2009). Anchoring gaze when categorizing faces' sex: Evidence from eye-tracking data. Vision Research, 49(23), 2870-2880.
21. Schütz, A. C., Braun, D. I., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2011). Eye movements and perception: A selective review. Journal of Vision, 11(5):9, 1-30, http://www.journalofvision.org/content/11/5/9, doi:10. 1167/11.5.9. [PubMed] [Article]
22. Schwarzer, G., Huber, S., & Dümmler, T. (2005). Gaze behavior in analytical and holistic face processing. Memory & Cognition, 33(2), 344-354.
23. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6(2), 174-215.
24. Thorpe, S. J., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520-522.
25. Verstijnen, I. M., & Wagemans, J. (2004). Ambiguous figures: Living versus nonliving objects. Perception, 33, 531-546.
26. Wagemans, J., De Winter, J., Op de Beeck, H., Ploeger, A., Beckers, T., & Vanroose, P. (2008). Identification of everyday objects on the basis of silhouette and outline versions. Perception, 37, 207-244.