Structuration aspects in academic spin-off emergence: A roadmap-based analysis

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 80, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 1162-1178

  Freitas, Jonathan Simões ^a   Gonçalves, Carlos Alberto ^a   Cheng, Lin Chih ^a   Muniz, Reynaldo Maia ^a  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Academic spin off; Causal cognitive mapping; Emergence; Qualitative comparative analysis; Roadmap; Structuration

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC SPIN-OFF; COGNITIVE MAPPING; EMERGENCE; QUALITATIVE COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS; ROADMAP; STRUCTURATION;

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS;

EDUCATION;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; HIGH TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; INDUSTRIAL PERFORMANCE; MAPPING; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; STRATEGIC APPROACH;

BRAZIL;

EID: 84878368731     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.021     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Herrmann P. Evolution of strategic management: the need for new dominant designs. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2005, 7:111-130.
2. Hoskisson R.E., Hitt M.A., Wan W.P., Yiu D. Theory and research in strategic management: swings of a pendulum. J. Manag. 1999, 25:417-456.
3. Mahoney T.J., McGahan A.M. The field of strategic management within the evolving science of strategic organization. Strateg. Organ. 2007, 5(1):79-99.
4. Mellahi K., Sminia H. Guest editors' introduction: the frontiers of strategic management research. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2009, 11(1):1-7.
5. Bower J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process 1970, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
6. Mintzberg H. The Nature of Managerial Work 1973, Harper & Row, New York, NY.
7. Quinn J.B. Strategies for Change: Logical Incrementalism 1980, Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, IL.
8. Pettigrew A.M. The Awakening Giant: Continuity and Change in ICI 1985, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
9. Wernerfelt B. A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg. Manag. J. 1985, 5:171-180.
10. Barney J.B. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17:99-120.
11. Mintzberg H., Waters J.A. Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strateg. Manag. J. 1985, 6:257-272.
12. Jarzabkowski P. Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach 2005, Sage, London, UK.
13. Whittington R. Strategy as practice. Long Range Plann. 1996, 29:731-735.
14. Pozzebon M. The influence of a structurationist view on strategic management research. J. Manag. Stud. 2004, 41(2):247-272.
15. Djokovic D., Souitaris V. Spinouts from academic institutions. A literature review with suggestions for further research. J. Technol. Transf. 2008, 33:225-247.
16. Mustar P., Renault M., Colombo M.G., Piva E., Fontes M., Lockett A., Wright M., Clarysse B., Moray N. Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy. Res. Policy 2006, 35:289-308.
17. O'Shea R.P., Chugh H., Allen T.J. Determinants and consequences of university spinoff activity. J. Technol. Transf. 2008, 33:653-666.
18. Rothaermel F.T., Agung S.D., Jiang L. University entrepreneurship: a taxonomy of the literature. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2007, 16(4):691-791.
19. Nicolaou N., Birley S. Social networks in organizational emergence: the university spinout phenomenon. Manag. Sci. 2003, 49(12):1702-1725.
20. Granstrand O. Towards a theory of the technology-based firm. Res. Policy 1998, 27:465-489.
21. Chesbrough H., Rosenbloom R.S. The role of business model in capturing value from innovation. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2002, 11(3):529-544.
22. Roberts E., Eesley C. Entrepreneurial impact: the role of MIT 2009, Massachussets Institute of Technology.
23. Degroof J.J., Roberts E.B. Overcoming weak entrepreneurial infrastructures for academic spinoff ventures. J. Technol. Transf. 2004, 29(3-4):327-354.
24. Vanaelst I., Clarysse B., Wright M., Lockett A., Moray N., S'Jegers R. Entrepreneurial team development in academic spinouts: an examination of team heterogeneity. Enterpren. Theor. Pract. 2006, 30(2):249-271.
25. Roberts E., Malone D.E. Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from research and development organizations. R&D Manage. 1996, 26:17-48.
26. Ndonzuau F.N., Pirnay F., Surlemont B. A stage model of academic spin-off creation. Technovation 2002, 22(5):281-289.
27. Vohora A., Wright M., Lockett A. Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spin-out companies. Res. Policy 2004, 33:147-175.
28. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J.P., Probert D.R. Roadmapping for strategy and innovation-aligning technology and markets in a dynamic world 2010, Institute for Manufacturing, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
29. Phaal R., O'Sullivan E., Routley M., Ford S., Probert D. A framework for mapping industrial emergence. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78:217-230.
30. Eden C. On the nature of cognitive maps. J. Manag. Stud. 1992, 29:261-265.
31. Eden C. Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues and problems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004, 159:673-686.
32. Fuglseth A.M., Gronhaug K. Theory-driven construction and analysis of cause maps. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2002, 22:357-376.
33. Huff A.F. Mapping strategic thought 1990, Wiley, Chichester, UK.
34. Kelly G.A. The Psychology of Personal Constructs 1955, Routledge, New York, Norton/London.
35. Walker B.M., Winter D.A. The elaboration of personal construct psychology. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2007, 58:453-477.
36. Nakagawa Y., Shiroyama H., Kuroda K., Suzuki T. Assessment of social implications of nanotechnologies in Japan: application of problem structuring method based on interview surveys and cognitive maps. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77:615-638.
37. Eppler M.J., Platts K.W. Visual strategizing-the systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Plann. 2009, 42:42-74.
38. Hodgkinson G.P., Maule A.J., Bown N.J. Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: a comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organ. Res. Methods 2004, 7(1):3-26.
39. Phaal R., Muller G. An architectural framework for roadmapping-towards visual strategy. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 76:39-49.
40. Abbott A. Conceptions of time and events in social science methods. Hist. Methods 1990, 23:140-150.
41. Ragin C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies 1987, University of California Press, Berkeley, Los Angeles and London.
42. Ragin C.C. Fuzzy-Set Social Science 2000, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Ragin C.C., Rihoux B. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): state of the art and prospects, Qualitative Methods. Newl. Am. Pol. Sci. Assoc. Organ. Sect. Qual. Methods 2004, 2(2):3-12.
44. Rihoux B. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods. Int. Sociol. 2006, 21:679-706.
45. Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis and Related Techniques 2008, Sage, Thousand Oaks, London. B. Rihoux, C.C. Ragin (Eds.).
46. Wagemann C., Schneider C.Q. Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets: agenda for a research approach and a data analysis technique. Comp. Sociol. 2010, 9:1-21.
47. Greckhammer T., Misangyi V., Elms H., Lacey R. Using qualitative comparative analysis in strategic management research: an examination of combinations of industry, corporate, and business-unit effects. Organ. Res. Methods 2008, 11(4):695-726.
48. Yin R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods 2004, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 3rd edition.
49. Ragin C.C. Turning the tables: how case-oriented methods challenge variable-oriented methods. Comp. Soc. Res. 1997, 1627-1642.
50. Freitas J.S., Gonçalves C.A., Cheng L.C., Muniz R.M. Structure and agency in academic spin-off creation: a retrospective roadmapping approach to characterize entrepreneurs' mental models. Porland Int. Conf. Manage. Eng. Technol. (PICMET), Portland 2011.
51. Shane S., Stuart T. Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Manag. Sci. 2002, 48(1):154-170.
52. Ragin C.C., Sonnett J. Between complexity and parsimony: limited diversity, counterfactual cases, and comparative analysis. Vergleichen in der politikwissenschaft 2004, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. S. Kropp, M. Minkenberg (Eds.).
53. Ragin C.C., Drass K.A., Davey S. Fuzzy-set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 2.0 2006, Department of Sociology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona.
54. Checkland P. Systems Thinking, Systems Practice 1981, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, West Sussex.
55. Tsoukas H. The validity of ideographic research explanations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 1989, 14:551-561.
56. Druille C., Garnsey E. Do academic spin-outs differ and does it matter?. J. Technol. Transf. 2004, 29(3-4):269-285.
57. Lockett A., Wright M. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Res. Policy 2005, 34(7):1043-1057.
58. Peng M.W., Sun S.L., Pinkham B., Chen H. The institution-based view as a third leg for a strategy tripod. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 2009, 23(3):63-81.
59. Lewin K. Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers by Kurt Lewin 1952, 169. Tavistock, London.