Fuel formulation for recent model light duty vehicles in Mexico base on a model for predicting gasoline emissions

Fuel

Volumn 107, Issue , 2013, Pages 371-381

  Schifter, I ^a   Diaz L ^a   Gonzalez U ^a   Gonzalez Macias C ^a  

^a INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL PETRÓLEO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Dynamometer; Gasoline properties; Light duty vehicles; Predictive model; Regulated and toxic emissions

Indexed keywords

DISTILLATION; DYNAMOMETERS; FUELS; GASOLINE; SOFTWARE TESTING; VEHICLES;

CHASSIS DYNAMOMETERS; GASOLINE COMPOSITIONS; GASOLINE PROPERTY; LIGHT DUTY VEHICLES; PREDICTIVE MODELING; STATISTICAL MODELING; TOXIC EMISSIONS; UNREGULATED EMISSIONS;

AIR POLLUTION;

EID: 84878350362     PISSN: 00162361     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.10.046     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Parrish DD, Kuster WC, Shao M, Yokouchi Y., Kondo Y, Goldan PD, et al Comparison of air pollutant emissions among mega-cities. Atmos Environ 2009; 43: 6435-41.
2. Baker AK, Beyersdorf AJ, Doezema L.A., Katzenstein A., Meinardi S, Simpson IJ, et al Measurements of nonmethane hydrocarbons in 28 United States cities. Atmos Environ 2008; 42: 170-82. (Pubitemid 350298027)
3. Mckinley G, Zuk M, Hojer M., Avalos M, Gonzalez I, Iniestra R., et al Quantification of local and global benefits from air pollution control in Mexico City. Environ Sci Technol 2005; 39: 1954-61.
4. Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Passant N.R., Pilling MJ Photochemical ozone creation potentials (POCPs) for different emission sources of organic compounds under European conditions estimated with a Master Chemical Mechanism. Atmos Environ 2007; 41: 2570-9. (Pubitemid 46435788)
5. 8 volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Hong Kong: overview of atmospheric processing and source apportionment. Atmos Environ 2007; 41: 1456-72. (Pubitemid 46149431)
6. Kansal A. Sources and reactivity of NMHCs and VOCs in the atmosphere: a review. J Hazard Mater 2009; 166: 17-26.
7. USEPA - US Environmental Protection Agency. Regulatory impact analysis: renewable fuel standard program. Chapter 3. Impacts on emissions from vehicles, nonroad equipment, and fuel production facilities. Assessment and Standards Division Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Report EPA420-R-07-004; 2007.
8. Karavalakis G, Bakeas E, Stournas S. Influence of oxidized biodiesel blends on regulated and unregulated emissions from a diesel passenger car. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 5306-12.
9. Graham LA, Belisle SL, Baas CL Emissions from light duty gasoline vehicles operating on low blend ethanol gasoline and E85. Atmos Environ 2008; 42: 4498-516.
10. Bishop GA, Stedman DH, Castro J.D., Davalos FJ On-road remote sensing of vehicle emissions in Mexico. Environ Sci Technol 1997; 31: 3505-10. (Pubitemid 28008203)
11. Schifter I, Diaz L, Duran J., Guzman E, Chavez O, Lopez - Salinas E. Remote sensing study of emissions from motor vehicles in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 395-401. (Pubitemid 36109788)
12. Schifter I, Diaz L, Vera M., Guzman E, Duran J, Ramos F., et al Evaluation of the vehicle inspection/maintenance program in the Metropolitan Area of Mexico City. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 196-200. (Pubitemid 36050066)
13. Mugica V, Vega E, Arriaga J.L., Ruiz ME Determination of motor vehicle profiles for non-methane organic compounds in the Mexico City metropolitan area. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 1998; 48: 1060-8. (Pubitemid 28523213)
14. Zavala M, Herndon SC, Slott R.S., Dunlea EJ, Marr LC, Shorter JH, et al Characterization of on-road vehicle emissions in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area using a mobile laboratory in chase and fleet average measurement modes during the MCMA-2003 field campaign. Atmos Chem Phys 2006; 6: 5129-42. (Pubitemid 44728280)
15. Zavala M, Lei W, Molina M.J., Molina LT Modeled and observed ozone sensitivity to mobile-source emissions in Mexico City. Atmos Chem Phys 2009; 9: 39-55.
16. Harley RA, Hooper D, Kean A.W., Kirchstetter TW, Hesson JM, Balberan NT, et al Effects of reformulated gasoline and motor vehicle fleet turnover on emissions and ambient concentrations of benzene. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40: 5084-8. (Pubitemid 44257477)
17. Burns VR, Benson JD, Hochhauser A.M., Koehl WJ, Reuter, RM. Description of auto/oil air quality improvement research program. Paper No. 912320. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1992.
18. Hochhauser AM, Benson JD, Burns V.R., Gorse RA, Koehl WJ, Painter LJ, et al SAE Technical Paper No. 912322. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1991.
19. Code of Federal Regulations. Office of the federal register, code of federal regulations, Title 40, Part 80.45. US Government Printing, Office, Washington, DC; 2007.
20. Misener R, Gounaris CE, Floudas CA Mathematical modeling and global optimization of large-scale extended pooling problems with the (EPA) complex emissions constraints. Comput Chem Eng 2010; 34: 1432-56.
21. Rao V. Development of an exhaust carbon monoxide emissions model. SAE paper No. 961214, Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1996.
22. Schifter I, Diaz L, Lopez-Salinas E. Predictive model to correlate fuel specifications with on-road vehicles emissions in Mexico. Environ Sci Technol 2006; 40: 1270-9. (Pubitemid 43271445)
23. CRC - Coordinating Research Council. Review of prior studies of fuel effects on vehicle emissions, Project E-84. Alpharetta, GA, USA; 2008.
24. ASTM - American Society for Testing Materials. Standard specification for spark-Ignition engine fuel, ASTM D-4814-01a. ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2001.
25. Code of Federal Regulations. Office of the federal register, code of federal regulations, Title 40, Part 86. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC; 1993.
26. Painter L, Rutherford JA Statistical design and analysis methods for the auto/oil air quality research program. SAE Technical Paper No. 920319. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1992.
27. Gao H, Niemeier D. Mobile emissions inventories: EMFAC7G and EMFAC2000 comparisons by air basin. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, CA; 2001.
28. CARB - California Air Resources Board. Study to define cold and hot start emissions. Final Investigative Report. Contract No. 93-322. Sacramento, USA; 1977.
29. CARB. EMFAC2007 Version 2.30 user guide: calculating emission inventories for vehicles in California. California Air Resource Board; 2006.
30. Boulter P, McCrae I, Joumard R., André M, Keller M, Sturm P, Hausberger S, et al. Assessment and reliability of transport emission models and inventory systems. Report UPR/IE/044/07. Commission Européenne, Crowthorne, UK; 2007.
31. McArragher JS, Becker RF, Bennett p.J., Claus G., Graham J, Lang G, et al Fuel quality, vehicle technology and their interactions. Report No. 99/55. CONCAWE, Brussels; 1999.
32. Hamasaki M, Yamaguchi M, Hirose K. Japan clean air program (JCAP) - step l study of gasoline vehicle and fuel influence on emissions. SAE Technical Paper No. 2000-01-1972. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 2000.
33. Le Jeune A., McDonald CR, Lee GR NOx aromatics effects in catalyst-equipped gasoline vehicles. SAE Technical Paper No. 941869. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1994.
34. Pentikäinen J., Rantanen L, Aakko p. The effect of heavy olefins and ethanol on gasoline emissions. SAE Fuels & Lubricants Meeting. Toulouse, France; 2004.
35. Rapp LA, Hochhauser AM, Painter L.J., Benson JD, Knepper JC, Reuter RM, et al Effects of fuel properties on mass exhaust emissions during various modes of operation. SAE Technical Paper No. 932726. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1993.
36. USEPA - US Environmental Protection Agency. Fuel oxygen effects on exhausts CO emissions. Office of Air and Radiation/Mobile Sources. Report EPA420-P-98-006; 1998.
37. Graham L. Chemical characterization of emissions from advanced technology light-duty vehicles. Atmos Environ 2005; 39: 2385-98.
38. Perry R, Gee IL Vehicle emissions in relation to fuel composition. Sci Total Environ 1995; 169: 149-56.
39. Goodfellow CL, Gorse RA, Hawkins M.J., McArragher JS European program on emissions, fuels and engine technologies (EPEFE) ~gasoline aromatics/E100 study. SAE Technical Paper No. 961072. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1996.
40. Duffy BL, Nelson PF, Ye Y, Weeks I.A., Galbally IE Emissions of benzene, toluene, xylenes, and 1, 3-butadiene from a representative portion of the Australian car fleet. Atmos Environ 1998; 32: 2693-704. (Pubitemid 28351830)
41. Zervas E, Montagne X, Lahaye J. Influence of fuel and air/fuel equivalence ratio on the emission of hydrocarbons from a SI engine. Experimental findings. Fuel 2004; 83: 2301-11.
42. Reuter RM, Benson JD, Burns V.R., Gorse RA, Hochhauser AM, Koehl WJ, et al Effects of oxygenated fuels and RVP on automotive emissions. SAE Technical Paper No. 920326. Society of Automotive Engineers, Warrendale, PA; 1992.
43. Hoekman SK. Speciated measurements and calculated reactivities of vehicle exhaust emissions from conventional and reformulated gasolines. Environ Sci Technol 1992; 26: 1206-16.
44. Karavalakis G, Durbin TD, Shrivastava M, Zheng Z., Villela M, Jung H. Impacts of ethanol fuel level on emissions of regulated and unregulated pollutants from a fleet of gasoline light-duty vehicles. Fuel 2012; 93: 549-58.
45. Ban-Weiss G.A., McLaughlin JP, Harley R.A., Kean AJ, Grosjean E, Grosjean D. Carbonyl and nitrogen dioxide emissions from gasoline- and diesel-powered motor vehicles. Environ Sci Technol 2008; 42: 3944-50. (Pubitemid 351770045)
46. Zervas E, Montagne X, Lahaye J. Emission of alcohols and carbonyl compounds from a spark ignition engine. Influence of fuel and air/fuel equivalence ratio. Environ Sci Technol 2002; 36: 2414-21. (Pubitemid 34595179)