A predictive model to correlate fuel specifications with on-road vehicles emissions in Mexico

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 1270-1279

  Schifter, I ^a   Diaz, L ^a   Lopez Salinas, E ^a  

^a INSTITUTO MEXICANO DEL PETRÓLEO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITION; DISTILLATION; GASOLINE; OLEFINS; OXYGEN; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; SPECIFICATIONS; SULFUR; VAPOR PRESSURE;

AIR MANAGEMENT PROGRAM; EVAPORATIVE EMISSIONS; STATISTICAL MODELS; TOXIC EMISSIONS;

FUELS;

1,3 BUTADIENE; ACETALDEHYDE; ALCOHOL; ALKENE; AROMATIC COMPOUND; BENZENE; CARBON MONOXIDE; FORMALDEHYDE; FUEL; GASOLINE; HYDROCARBON; NITROGEN OXIDE; OXYGEN; SULFUR;

AROMATIC COMPOUNDS; COMPOSITION; DISTILLATION; FUELS; GASOLINE; OLEFINS; OXYGEN; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; SPECIFICATIONS; SULFUR; VAPOR PRESSURE;

ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; EMISSION CONTROL; POLLUTION CONTROL;

ARTICLE; DISTILLATION; DYNAMOMETRY; EXHAUST GAS; MANAGEMENT; MEXICO; MODEL; PREDICTION; VAPOR PRESSURE;

AIR POLLUTANTS; CARBON MONOXIDE; ETHANOL; GASOLINE; HYDROCARBONS; METHYL ETHERS; MEXICO; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOTOR VEHICLES; NITROGEN OXIDES; SULFUR; VEHICLE EMISSIONS;

FEDERAL DISTRICT [MEXICO]; MEXICO [NORTH AMERICA]; MEXICO CITY; NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 33144456172     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/es0503884     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Edgerton, S. A.; Bian, X.; Doran, J. C.; Fast, J. D.; Hubbe, J. M.; Malone, E. L; Shaw, W. J.; Whiteman, C. D.; Zhong, S.; Arriaga, J. L.; Ortiz, E.; Ruiz, M.; Sosa, G.; Vega, E.; Limon, T.; Guzman, F.; Archuleta, J.; Bessert, J. E.; Elliot, S.; Lee, J. T.; McNeir, L. A.; Chow, J. C.; Watson, J. G.; Coutler, R. L.; Doskey, P. V.; Gafney, J. S.; Marley, N. A.; Neff, W.; Petty, R. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 1999, 49, 1221.
2. Smith, F. A.; Elliot, S.; Blake, D.; Rowland, F. S. Environ. Sci. Policy 2002, issue 6, 449.
3. McKinley, G.; Zuk, M.; Jojer, M.; Avalos, M.; González, I.; Hernández, M.; Iniestra, R.; Laguna, I.; Martinez, M.; Osnaya, P.; Reynales, L.; Valdés, R.; Martínez, J. The Local Benefits of Global Air Pollution Control in Mexico City; Instituteo Nacional de Ecología: Mexico City, 2003. http://www.epa.gov/ies/documents/mexico/ maxicofinal.pdf.
4. Schifter, I.; Magdaleno, M.; Díaz, L; Krueger, B.; Léon, J.; Palmerín, M. E.; Casas, R.; Melgarejo, A.; López-Salinas, E. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. 2002, 52, 174.
5. Arriaga-Colin, J. L.; Jason West, J.; Sosa, G.; Escalona, S. S.; Orduñez, R. M.; Cervantes, A. D. M. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38, 2523-2533.
6. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Mobile Sources. EPA Staff Paper on Gasoline Sulfur Issues; Report No. EPA-420R98-005; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1998.
7. Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Predicted Effects of Reformulated Gasoline T50, T90, Sulfur and Oxygen Content on Air Quality in Years 2000 and 2010; Technical Bulletin 21; Coordinating Research Council: Atlanta, GA, 1997.
8. Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. Program Final Report; Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program: Detroit, MI, 1997.
9. Burns, V. R.; Benson, J. D.; Hochhauser, A. M.; Koehl, W. J.; Dreucher, W. M.; Reuter, P. M. Description of the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. In Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program, SAE SP-920; SAE Technical Paper 912320; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1992; pp 1-28.
10. Burns, V. R.; Hochhauser, A. M.; Reuter R. M.; Rapp, L. A.; Knepper, J. C.; Rippon, B.; Koehl, W. J.; Leppard, W. R.; Rutherford, J. A.; Benson, J. D.; Painter, L. J. Gasoline reformulation and vehicle technology effects on emissions - Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program. In Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program, SAE SP-1117; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1995; Vol. 3, pp 143-165.
11. Air Quality Report: Report of the Working Group I on Environmental Objectives, Auto Oil II Programme final version 7.1.; European Commission. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Directorate General for the Environment, 2000, Luxembourg. http://europa.eu.int/comm/ environment/sitemap_en.htm.
12. Code of Federal Regulations, Subpart D 80.40, Reformulated Gasoline; Office of the Federal Register: Washington, DC, 1994.
13. Schifter, I.; Díaz, L.; Vera, M.; Castillo, M.; Ramos, F.; Avalos, S.; Lopez-Salinas, E. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000, 34, 2663.
14. Pahl, R. H.; McNally, M. J. Fuel Blending and Analysis for the Auto/Oil Air Quality Improvement Research Program; Paper No. 902098; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1990.
15. American Society for Testing Materials. Standard Specification for Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel; D-4814-01a; American Society for Testing Materials: West Conshohocken, PA, 2001.
16. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40, Part 86, Office of the Federal Register; Washington, DC, 1993.
17. Painter, L.; Rutherford, J. A. In Auto/Oil Quality Improvement Research Program; Paper No. 920319; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1992.
18. Special Task Force FE/STF-20, CONCAWE Fuels Quality and Emissions Management Group. Fuel Effects on Emissions from Modern Gasoline Vehicles: Part 1 - Sulphur Effects; CONCAWE: Brussels, Belgium, 2003.
19. Schifter, I.; Díaz, L.; Vera, M.; Guzman, E.; López- Salinas, E. Fuel 2004, 83, 2065.
20. Bjordal, S. D.; Goodfellow, C. L.; Bennett, P.; Beckwith, P. Relative effects of catalyst and fuel formulation on gasoline vehicle exhaust emissions. In Proceedings of the International Fall Fuels and Lubricants Meeting and Exposition, San Antonio, TX, Oct 14-17, 1996; Paper No. 961902; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1996.
21. Stebar, R. F.; Benson, J. D.; Brinkman, N. D.; Dunker, A. M.; Sapre, A. R.; Schwing, A. R.; Martens, S. W. Gasoline Vapor Pressure Reduction-an Option for Cleaner Air; Paper No. 852132; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1985.
22. Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. Vapor Recovery Test Procedure TP-201.2c, Spillage from Phase II Systems; California Environmental Protection Agency: Sacramento, CA, 1996.
23. Schifter, I.; Vera, M.; Díaz, L.; Guzmán, E.; Ramos, F.; Lopez-Salinas, E. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 1893.
24. Hochhauser, A. M.; Benson J. D.; Burns, V.; Gorse, R. A.; Koehl, W. J.; Painter, L. J.; Rippon, B. H.; Reuter, R. M.; Rutherford, J. A. In Auto/Oil Quality Improvement Research Program; Paper No. 912322; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1992.
25. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Fuel Sulfur Effects on Exhaust Emissions; Report Number M6.Ful.001; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2001.
26. Regulations of fuels and fuels additives; Standards for reformulated and conventional gasoline: Final rule. Fed. Regist. 1994, 59 (32).
27. Rao, V. Development of an Exhaust Carbon Monoxide Emissions Model; Paper No. 961214; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1996.
28. Air Resources Board, California Environmental Protection Agency. California Procedures for Evaluating Alternative Specifications for Phase 3 Reformulated Gasolines. Using the California Predictive Model; California Environmental Protection Agency: Sacramento, CA, 2000.
29. Korotney, D. J.; Rao, V.; Lindhjem, C. E.; Sklar, M. Reformulated Gasoline Effects on Exhaust Emissions: Phase III; Investigation on the Effects of Sulfur, Olefins, Volatility, and Aromatics and the Interactions Between Olefins and Volatility or Sulfur, Paper No. 950782; Society of Automotive Engineers: Warrendale, PA, 1995.
30. Environmental Protection Agency. Final Regulatory Impact Analysis for Reformulated Gasoline; Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 1993.