Getting into guided search

Tutorials in Visual Cognition

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 93-119

  Wolfe, Jeremy M ^a   Horowitz, Todd S ^a   Palmer, Evan M ^a   Michod, Kristin O ^b   Van Wert, Michael J ^c  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78649702612     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203847305     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. Ahissar, M., & Hochstein, S. (1997). Task difficulty and visual hierarchy: Counterstreams in sensory processing and perceptual learning. Nature, 387, 401–406.
2. Ariely, D. (2001). Seeing sets: Representation by statistical properties. Psychological Science, 12(2), 157–162.
3. Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception and Psychophysics, 55(5), 485–496.
4. Barlow, H. B. (1985). The twelfth Bartlett memorial lecture: The role of single neurons in the psychology of perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37A, 121–145.
5. Bergen, J. R., & Julesz, B. (1983). Rapid discrimination of visual patterns. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-13, 857–863.
6. Broadbent, D. E. (1958). Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
7. Cave, K. (1999). The FEATUREGATE model of visual selection. Psychological Research, 62(2–3), 182–194.
8. Chong, S. C., & Treisman, A. (2003). Representation of statistical properties. Vision Research, 43(4), 393–404.
9. Chun, M. M., & Wolfe, J. M. (1996). Just say no: How are visual searches terminated when there is no target present? Cognitive Psychology, 30, 39–78.
10. Cousineau, D., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Termination of a visual search with large display size effects. Spatial Vision, 17(4–5), 327–352.
11. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(1), 87–114; discussion: 114–185.
12. Cudeiro, J., & Sillito, A. M. (2006). Looking back: Corticothalamic feedback and early visual processing. Trends in Neuroscience, 29(6), 298–306.
13. Deco, G., Pollatos, O., & Zihl, J. (2002). The time course of selective visual attention: Theory and experiments. Vision Research, 42(27), 2925–2945.
14. Deutsch, J. A., & Deutsch, D. (1963). Attention: Some theoretical considerations. Psychological Review, 70, 80–90.
15. Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T., & Rensink, R. A. (2000). Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual pathways. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 481–507.
16. Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J.-I., Zuvic, S. M., & Visser, T. A. W. (2001). The preattentive emperor has no clothes: A dynamic redressing. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 130(3), 479–492.
17. Egeth, H. E., Virzi, R. A., & Garbart, H. (1984). Searching for conjunctively defined targets. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 32–39.
18. Goodale, M. A. (1996). One visual experience, many visual systems. In T. Inui & McClelland (Eds.), Attention and performance XVI (Vol. 16, pp. 369–393). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial and object representations. Psychological Review, 101(3), 470–489.
20. Gurnsey, R., & Browse, R. A. (1989). Asymmetries in visual texture discrimination. Spatial Vision, 4(1), 31–44.
21. Hamker, F. H. (2004). A dynamic model of how feature cues guide spatial attention. Vision Research, 44(5), 501–521.
22. Hamker, F. (2006). Modeling feature-based attention as an active top-down inference process Biosystems, 86(1–3), 91–99.
23. Held, R. (1970). Two modes of processing spatially distributed visual stimuli. In F. O. Schmitt (Ed.), The neurosciences: Second study program (pp. 317–324). New York: Rockefeller University.
24. Herd, S., & O’Reilly, R. (2005). Serial search from a parallel model. Vision Research, 45(24), 2987–2992.
25. Hillstrom, A. P. (2000). Repetition effects in visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 62(4), 800–817.
26. Hochstein, S., & Ahissar, M. (2002). View from the top: Hierarchies and reverse hierarchies in the visual system. Neuron, 36, 791–804.
27. Hodsoll, J. P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2005). The effect of target foreknowledge on visual search for categorically separable orientation targets. Vision Research, 45(18), 2346–2351.
28. Hoffman, J. E. (1979). A two-stage model of visual search. Perception and Psychophysics, 25, 319–327.
29. Hong, S.-K. (2005). Human stopping strategies in multiple-target search. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 35, 1–12.
30. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394(Aug 6), 575–577.
31. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2001). Search for multiple targets: Remember the targets, forget the search. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(2), 272–285.
32. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2003). Memory for rejected distractors in visual search? Visual Cognition, 10(3), 257–298.
33. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2005). Visual search: The role of memory for rejected distractors. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 264–268). San Diego, CA: Academic Press/Elsevier.
34. Hubner, R. (2001). A formal version of the guided search (GS2) model. Perception & Psychophysics, 63(6), 945–951.
35. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10–12), 1489–1506.
36. Julesz, B. (1984). A brief outline of the texton theory of human vision. Trends in Neuroscience, 7(Feb), 41–45.
37. Julesz, B., & Krose, B. (1988). Features and spatial filters. Nature, 333, 302–303.
38. Kinchla, R. A. (1992). Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 711–742.
39. Kristjansson, A. (2006). Simultaneous priming along multiple feature dimensions in a visual search task. Vision Research, 46(16), 2554–2570.
40. Kristjansson, A., Wang, D., & Nakayama, K. (2002). The role of priming in conjunctive visual search. Cognition, 85(1), 37–52.
41. Krummenacher, J., Muller, H. J., & Heller, D. (2001). Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 63(5), 901–917.
42. Lamme, V. A., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neuroscience, 23(11), 571–579.
43. Lamy, D., Bar-Anan, Y., Egeth, H. E., & Carmel, T. (2006). Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(2), 287–293.
44. Lamy, D., & Egeth, H. E. (2003). Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 1003–1020.
45. Lamy, D., & Tsal, Y. (1999). A salient distractor does not disrupt conjunction search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 93–98.
46. Li, F., VanRullen, R., Koch, C., & Perona, P. (2002). Rapid natural scene categorization in the near absence of attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 99(14), 9596–9601.
47. Li, Z. (2002). A salience map in primary visual cortex. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 9–16.
48. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390(20 Nov), 279–281.
49. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness: Perception without attention. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual attention (Vol. 8, pp. 55–76). New York: Oxford University Press.
50. Mack, A., Tang, B., Tuna, R., & Kahn, S. (1992). Perceptual organization and attention. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 475–501.
51. Maljkovic, V., & Martini, P. (2005). Implicit short-term memory and event frequency effects in visual search. Vision Research, 45(21), 2831–2846.
52. Maljkovic, V., & Nakayama, K. (1994). Priming of popout: I. Role of features. Memory & Cognition, 22(6), 657–672.
53. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 29(3), 362–372.
54. McLeod, P., Driver, J., & Crisp, J. (1988). Visual search for conjunctions of movement and form is parallel. Nature, 332, 154–155.
55. Moraglia, G. (1989). Display organization and the detection of horizontal lines segments. Perception and Psychophysics, 45, 265–272.
56. Muller, H. J., Reimann, B., & Krummenacher, J. (2003). Visual search for singleton feature targets across dimensions: Stimulus- and expectancy-driven effects in dimensional weighting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(5), 1021–1035.
57. Nakayama, K., & Silverman, G. H. (1986). Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions. Nature, 320, 264–265.
58. Navalpakkam, V., Rebesco, J., & Itti, L. (2004). Modeling the influence of knowledge of the target and distractors on visual search. Journal of Vision, VSS04 (abs E123).
59. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton, Century, Crofts.
60. Noe, A., Pessoa, L., & Thompson, E. (2000). Beyond the grand illusion: What change blindness really teaches us about vision. Visual Cognition, 7(1), 93–106.
61. Nothdurft, H.-C. (1993). Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search. Vision Research, 33(5/6), 839–844.
62. Oliva, A., & Torralba, A. (2001). Modeling the shape of the scene: A holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 42(3), 145–175.
63. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient features depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(3), 650–657.
64. O’Regan, J. K., & Noe, A. (2001). A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 957.
65. Parkhurst, D., Law, K., & Niebur, E. (2002). Modeling the role of salience in the allocation of overt visual attention. Vision Research, 42(1), 107–123.
66. Pashler, H. (1998a). The psychology of attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Pashler, H. E. (1998b). Attention. Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press Ltd.
68. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of attention. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 55–66). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
69. Ratcliff, R. (1978). A theory of memory retrieval. Psychological Review, 85(2), 59–108.
70. Ratcliff, R. (2006). Modeling response signal and response time data. Cognitive Psychology, 53(3), 195–237.
71. Rauschenberger, R. (2003). Attentional capture by auto- and allo-cues. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 814–842.
72. Rensink, R. A., & Enns, J. T. (1995). Preemption effects in visual search: Evidence for lowlevel grouping. Psychological Review, 102(1), 101–130.
73. Sanders, A. F., & Donk, M. (1996). Visual search. In O. Neumann & A. F. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of perception and action, vol. 3: Attention (pp. 43–77). London: Academic Press.
74. Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1–66.
75. Serre, T., Oliva, A., & Poggio, T. (2007). A feedforward architecture accounts for rapid categorization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104(15), 6424–6429.
76. Shiffrin, M. R., & Schneider, W. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review, 84, 127–190.
77. Theeuwes, J. (1991). Exogenous and endogenous control of attention: The effect of visual onsets and offsets. Perception and Psychophysics, 49(1), 83–90.
78. Thornton, T. L., & Gilden, D. L. (2007). Parallel and serial processes in visual search. Psychological Review, 114(1), 71–103.
79. Thorpe, S., Fize, D., & Marlot, C. (1996). Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature, 381, 520–552.
80. Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features on object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766–786.
81. Treisman, A. (1988). Features and objects: The 14th Bartlett memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, 201–237.
82. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97–136.
83. Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12, 3–17.
84. Treisman, A. M., & Schmidt, H. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107–141.
85. Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
86. VanRullen, R., & Thorpe, S. J. (2001). Is it a bird? Is it a plane? Ultrarapid visual categorization of natural and artifactual objects. Perception, 30(6), 655–668.
87. Weisstein, N. (1973). Beyond the yellow Volkswagen detector and the grandmother cell: A general strategy for the exploration of operations in human pattern recognition. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Contemporary issues in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium (pp. 17–51). Washington, DC: Winston/Wiley.
88. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 1(2), 202–238.
89. Wolfe, J. M. (1998a). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13–74). Hove, East Sussex, England: Psychology Press Ltd.
90. Wolfe, J. M. (1998b). What do 1,000,000 trials tell us about visual search? Psychological Science, 9(1), 33–39.
91. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York: Oxford University Press.
92. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(2), 483–502.
93. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433.
94. Wolfe, J. M., & DiMase, J. S. (2003). Do intersections serve as basic features in visual search? Perception, 32(6), 645–656.
95. Wolfe, J. M., Friedman-Hill, S. R., Stewart, M. I., & O’Connell, K. M. (1992). The role of categorization in visual search for orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(1), 34–49.
96. Wolfe, J. M., & Gancarz, G. (1996). Guided search 3.0: A model of visual search catches up with Jay Enoch 40 years later. In V. Lakshminarayanan (Ed.), Basic and clinical applications of vision science (pp. 189–192). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
97. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(6), 495–501.
98. Wolfe, J., Horowitz, T., Kenner, N. M., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44(12), 1411–1426.
99. Wolfe, J. M., Klempen, N. L., & Shulman, E. P. (1999). Which end is up? Two representations of orientation in visual search. Vision Research, 39(12), 2075–2086.
100. Wylie, G., & Allport, A. (2000). Task switching and the measurement of “switch costs.” Psychological Research, 63(3–4), 212–233.
101. Yantis, S. (1993). Stimulus-driven attentional capture. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2(5), 156–161.
102. Yantis, S. (1995). Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science, 6(3), 182–186.
103. Zenger, B., & Fahle, M. (1997). Missed targets are more frequent than false alarms: A model for error rates in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(6), 1783–1791.
104. Zhaoping, L., & Koene, A. R. (2007). Feature-specific interactions in salience from combined feature contrasts: Evidence for a bottom–up saliency map in V1. Journal of Vision, 7(7), article 6, 1–14.