MR measurement of alloy magnetic susceptibility: Towards developing tissue-susceptibility matched metals

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 233, Issue , 2013, Pages 49-55

  Astary, Garrett W ^a   Peprah, Marcus K ^b   Fisher, Charles R ^a   Stewart, Rachel L ^a   Carney, Paul R ^a,c   Sarntinoranont, Malisa ^c   Meisel, Mark W ^b,c   Manuel, Michele V ^a   Mareci, Thomas H ^c  

^a J Crayton Pruitt Family Department of Biomedical Engineering   (United States)

^b University of Florida   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Alloys; Field mapping; Magnetic field perturbation; Magnetic resonance imaging; Magnetic susceptibility

Indexed keywords

ALLOYING; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; COPPER ALLOYS; ELECTRODES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETISM; MAGNETOMETERS; MAGNETOMETRY; METALS; MOLLUSCS; SHELLFISH; SOLID SOLUTIONS; TIN; TIN ALLOYS; TISSUE;

BIOCOMPATIBLE DEVICES; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGICAL RECORDINGS; FIELD MAPPING; GEOMETRICAL CONSTRAINTS; HIGH TEMPORAL RESOLUTION; MAGNETIC FIELD PERTURBATIONS; SUSCEPTIBILITY ARTIFACTS; SUSCEPTIBILITY MEASUREMENTS;

METAL IMPLANTS;

EID: 84878306557     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: 10960856     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2013.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J.D. Kraus, Electromagnetics, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, 1992.
2. C.J.G. Bakker, R. Bhagwandien, M.A. Moerland, M. Fuderer, Susceptibility artifacts in 2dft spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging - the cylinder model revisited, Magn. Reson. Imaging 11 (4) (1993) 539-548.
3. F.M. Martinez-Santiesteban, S.D. Swanson, D.C. Noll, D.J. Anderson, Magnetic field perturbation of neural recording and stimulating microelectrodes, Phys. Med. Biol. 52 (8) (2007) 2073-2088. (Pubitemid 46553639)
4. D.W. Carmichael, S. Vulliemoz, R. Rodionov, J.S. Thornton, A.W. McEvoy, L. Lemieux, Simultaneous intracranial EEG-fMRI in humans: protocol considerations and data quality, Neuroimage 63 (1) (2012) 301-309.
5. R.J. Huster, S. Debener, T. Eichele, C.S. Herrmann, Methods for simultaneous EEG-fMRI: an introductory review, J. Neurosci. 32 (18) (2012) 6053-6060
6. F.E. Hoare, J.C. Matthews, J.C. Walling, The thermal and magnetic properties of palladium-silver alloys, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. Ser. A - Math. Phys. Sci. 216 (1127) (1953) 502-515.
7. D.W. Budworth, F.E. Hoare, J. Preston, The thermal and magnetic properties of some transition element alloys, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A - Math. Phys. Sci. 257 (1289) (1960) 250-262.
8. M. Sawicki, W. Stefanowicz, A. Ney, Sensitive SQUID magnetometry for studying nanomagnetism, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 26 (6) (2011) 064006.
9. N. Saunders, A.P. Miodownik, "Cu-Sn (Copper-Tin)", Binary Alloy Phase Diagrams, ASM Handbooks Online, ASM International, 1990.
10. Y.C.N. Cheng, J. Neelavalli, E.M. Haacke, Limitations of calculating field distributions and magnetic susceptibilities in MRI using a Fourier based method, Phys. Med. Biol. 54 (5) (2009) 1169-1189.
11. J. Neelavalli, Y.C. Cheng, J. Jiang, E.M. Haacke, Removing background phase variations in susceptibility-weighted imaging using a fast, forward-field calculation, J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 29 (4) (2009) 937-948.
12. J.P. Marques, R. Bowtell, Application of a Fourier-based method for rapid calculation of field inhomogeneity due to spatial variation of magnetic susceptibility, Concept. Magn. Reson. 25B (1) (2005) 65-78. (Pubitemid 40776540)
13. K. Bartusek, Z. Dokoupil, E. Gescheidtova, Magnetic field mapping around metal implants using an asymmetric spin-echo MRI sequence, Meas. Sci. Technol. 17 (12) (2006) 3293-3300. (Pubitemid 46069692)
14. K.M. Koch, X. Papademetris, D.L. Rothman, R.A. de Graaf, Rapid calculations of susceptibility-induced magnetostatic field perturbations for in vivo magnetic resonance, Phys. Med. Biol. 51 (24) (2006) 6381-6402. (Pubitemid 46217628)
15. C.J.G. Bakker, H. de Leeuw, K.L. Vincken, E.J. Vonken, J. Hendrikse, Phase gradient mapping as an aid in the analysis of object-induced and systemrelated phase perturbations in MRI, Phys. Med. Biol. 53 (18) (2008) N349-N358.
16. Y.C. Cheng, C.Y. Hsieh, J. Neelavalli, Q. Liu, M.S. Dawood, E.M. Haacke, A complex sum method of quantifying susceptibilities in cylindrical objects: the first step toward quantitative diagnosis of small objects in MRI, Magn. Reson. Imaging 25 (8) (2007) 1171-1180. (Pubitemid 47464835)
17. R. Bowers, Magnetic susceptibility of copper metal at low temperatures, Phys. Rev. 102 (6) (1956) 1486-1488.
18. W.G. Henry, J.L. Rogers, The magnetic susceptibilities of some diamagnetic alloys - the primary solid solutions of cadmium, indium, tin, and antimony in copper and in silver - zinc, gallium, germanium, and arsenic in silver - copper in silver and silver in copper, Can. J. Phys. 38 (7) (1960) 908-926.