The Effects of Student Response Systems on Student Learning and Attitudes in Undergraduate Psychology Courses

Teaching of Psychology

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 26-30

  Fortner Wood, Cheryl ^a   Armistead, Leigh ^a   Marchand, Anna ^a   Morris, F Benjamin ^a  

^a WINTHROP UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

clickers; communication apprehension; student response systems

Indexed keywords

EID: 84878284451     PISSN: 00986283     EISSN: 15322802     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0098628312465860     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Anthis K. (2011). Is it the clicker, or is it the question? Untangling the effects of student response system use. Teaching of Psychology, 38, 189 –193.
2. Christopherson K. (2011). Hardware or wetware: What are the possible interactions of pedagogy and technology in the classroom? Teaching of Psychology, 38, 288–292.
3. Davis S. (2003). Observations in classrooms using a network of handheld devices. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19, 298–307.
4. Judson E. Sawada D. (2002). Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 21, 167–181.
5. Kaleta R. Joosten T. (2007). Student response systems: A University of Wisconsin System study of clickers. Boulder, CO: Educause Center for Applied Research.
6. Kay R. H. LeSage A. (2009). Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 53, 819–827.
7. Kennedy G. E. Cutts Q. I. (2005). The association between students' use of an electronic voting system and their learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 260–268.
8. Kuh G. D. (2001). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
9. Kuh G. D. Kinzie J. Schuh J. H. Whitt E. J. (2010). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
10. McCroskey J. C. (2005). Introduction to rhetorical communication (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
11. McCroskey J. C. (1984). The communication apprehension perspective. In Daly J. A. McCroskey J. C. (eds.), Avoiding communication: Shyness, reticence, and communication apprehension (pp. 13–38). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
12. National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE). (2006). College Student Report 2006 Codebook. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning, Bloomington, IN. Retrieved September 18, 2012, from http://www.nsse.iub.edu/pdf/2006_Institutional_Report/nsse_codebooks/NSSE%202006%20Codebook.pdf
13. Poulis J. Massen C. Robens E. Gilbert M. (1997). Physics lecturing with audience paced feedback. Retrieved June 15, 2007, from http://www.bedu.com/publications
14. Preszler R. W. Dawe A. Shuster C. B. Shuster M. (2007). Assessment of the effects of student response systems on student learning and attitudes over a broad range of biology courses. Life Sciences Education, 6, 29–41.
15. Roschelle J. Penuel W. R. Abrahamson A. L. (2004). Classroom response and communication systems: Research review and theory. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.