Review of international modeling literature: Transit, land use, and auto pricing strategies to reduce vehicle miles traveled and greenhouse gas emissions

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 2132, 2009, Pages 1-12

  Rodier, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECONOMICS; GAS EMISSIONS; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GASES; VEHICLES;

CALIFORNIA; CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCE BOARD; GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGES; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GAS REDUCTIONS; IN-VEHICLE TECHNOLOGY; INTERNATIONAL MODEL; PASSENGERS VEHICLES; PRICING STRATEGY; VEHICLE-MILES TRAVELED;

LAND USE;

EID: 76149128656     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2132-01     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Lautso, K., K. Spiekermann, M. Wegener, I. Sheppard, P. Steadman, A. Marino, R. Domingo, and S. Gayda. PROPOLIS: Planning and Research of Policies for Land Use and Transport for Increasing Urban Sustainability: Final Report. European Commission, Energy, Environment, and Sustainable Development Thematic Programme, Feb. 2004.
2. The Metropolis Plan: Choices for the Chicago Region. Chicago Metropolis 2020, Chicago, Ill., 2003.
3. Simmonds, D., A. Skinner, O. Feldman, J. Nicoll, and C. Sinclair. Wider Economic Impacts of Transport Interventions: Final Report. London, 2006.
4. Safirova, E., S. Houde, and W. Harrington. Spatial Development and Energy Consumption. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC., 2007.
5. Nelson, P., K. Gillingham, and E. Safirova. Revving up the Tax Engine: Gas Taxes and the DC Metro Area's Transportation Dilemma. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC., 2003.
6. Regional Analysis of What-If Transportation Scenarios: Final Report. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC), Philadelphia, Pa., 2003.
7. Deakin, E., G. Harvey, R. Pozdenza, and G. Yarema. Transportation Pricing Strategies for California: An Assessment of Congestion, Emissions, Energy, and Equity Impacts. California Air Resources Board, Nov. 1996.
8. Transportation 2035 in Motion Forecasts for the San Francisco Bay Area 2009 Regional Transportation Plan. Metropolitan Planning Commission (MTC), Oakland, Calif., November, 2007.
9. -2020 Cities/County Forecast Land Use Alternatives Summary. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego, Calif., 1998.
10. -2030 Regional Transportation Plan: Pathways for the Future. San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG), San Diego, Calif., 2007.
11. Southern California Compass. Growth Vision Report. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Los Angeles, 2004.
12. Draft Regional Transportation Plan. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Los Angeles, 2008.
13. BCI, AUEB, ITS, JRC IPTS, KUL-SADL, LT, Novem, Spiekermann and Wegener, Stratec, TIS, TRL, TRT, TTR, and UPM. Scenarios for the Transport System and Energy Supply and Their Potential Effects: STEPs. Work Package 4 Scenario Impacts: Deliverable 4.2. 2006.
14. Envision Central Texas Briefing Packet. ENVISION Central Texas. Austin, Tex., 2003.
15. Scenario Analysis: Executive Summary. Envision Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, 1998.
16. Strategy Analysis: Quality Growth Efficiency Tools. Governor's Office of Planning and Budget, Salt Lake City, Utah, 2000.
17. Johnston, R. A., C. Rodier, M. Choy, and J. E. Abraham. Air Quality Impacts of Transit and Supporting Land Use and Pricing Policies. A Report for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Feb. 2000.
18. Rodier, C. Air Emissions Impacts of Regional Transportation and Land Development Policies. Report for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, June 2002.
19. Johnston, R. A., S. Gao, and M. J. Clay. Modeling Long-Range Transportation and Land Use Scenarios for the Sacramento Region, Using Citizen-Generated Policies. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No.1902, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2005, pp. 99-106.
20. Tall Order Forum 2004: Regional Choices for Our Future. Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), Sacramento, Calif., 2004.
21. Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2025. Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), Sacramento, Calif., 2008.
22. Two Roads Diverge: Analyzing Growth Scenarios for the Twin Cities Region. Center for Energy and Environment (CEE), Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1,000 Friends of Minnesota, June 1999.
23. Barnes, G. Transportation-Related Impacts of Different Regional Land-Use Scenarios. Final Report. Humphrey Institute of Public Affairs, University of Minnesota. Minnesota Department of Transportation, Minneapolis, Sept. 2003.
24. Cambridge Systematics Inc. (CSI) et al. Analysis of Alternatives. Making the Land Use Transportation Air Quality Connections. One Thousand Friends of Oregon, Portland, May 1996.
25. Region 2040: Concepts for Growth. Metro, Portland, Ore., 1998.
26. Summary and Comparison Between Alternatives. Vision 2020. Growth Strategy and Transportation Plan for the Central Puget Sound Region. Final Environmental Impact Statement. Puget Sound Council of Governments (PSCOG), Seattle, Wash., Sept. 1990.
27. Smart Mobility, Inc. Baltimore Vision 2030. Transportation Indicators. Baltimore Regional Partnership. Baltimore Metropolitan Council (BMC). Norwich, Vt. Nov. 2002.
28. Community Connections: A Transportation Vision for the Next 25 Years. Land Use Experiment Technical Memorandum 8. HDR. Orlando, Fla., July 2003.
29. Bai, S., D. Niemeier, S. Handy, S. Gao, J. Lund, and D. Sullivan. Integrated Impacts of Regional Development, Land Use Strategies and Transportation Planning on Future Air Pollution Emissions. Transportation Land-Use Planning and Air Quality Conference, 2007.
30. Planning Implications of Alternate Development Patterns on Infrastructure and Existing Planning Policies. Pee Dee Regional Council of Governments (Pee Dee COG), Florence, S.C., 2003.
31. Regional Transportation Plan: Transportation Conformity Report. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Los Angeles, 2008.
32. Wider Economic Impacts of Transport Interventions: Final Report. D. Simmonds and M. Parkman, MVA Consultancies, London, England, 2006.