Opportunities for and impacts of carsharing: A survey of the Austin, Texas market

International Journal of Sustainable Transportation

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 135-152

  Zhou, Bin ^a   Kockelman, Kara M ^b  

^a CENTRAL CONNECTICUT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARSHARING; MEMBERSHIP MODELS; OPTIMISM BIAS; PUBLIC OPINIONS; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL EFFECT; STATED PREFERENCE SURVEYS; TRAVEL PATTERNS; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP;

FLEET OPERATIONS;

SURVEYS;

CAR OWNERSHIP; CAR USE; SURVEY; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR; TRAVEL DEMAND;

AUSTIN; TEXAS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79551698059     PISSN: 15568318     EISSN: 15568334     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15568311003717181     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Austin Car Share. 2007. http://carshareaustin.org/enrollmentinfo.php. Accessed in July 2007.
2. Bomberg M, Kockelman K. 2007. Traveler response to the 2005 gas price spike. Meeting Compendium of the Transportation Research Board's 86th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
3. Cervero R. 2003. City CarShare: First-year travel demand impacts. Transportation Research Record 1839:159-166.
4. Cervero R, Tsai Y. 2004. City CarShare in San Francisco: Second-year travel demand and car ownership impacts. Transportation Research Record 1887:117-127.
5. Communauto. 2004. Public transit/Car Sharing Integrated mobility for innovative cities: Public Transit/Car Sharing integration projects for sustainable transportation in Canadian cities. http://www.communauto.com/abonnes/PT-CSO.pdf
6. Cooper G, Howes D, Mye P. 2000. The missing link: An evaluation of CarSharing Portland, Inc., Portland, OR: Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
7. Cummings RG, Harrison GW, Rutstrom EE. 1995. Homegrown values and hypothetical surveys: Is the dichotomous choice approach incentive-compatible? American Economic Review 85:260-266.
8. Evans L. 2004. Traffic safety. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Science Serving Society.
9. Fox JA, Shogren JF, Hayes DJ, Kliebenstein JB. 1998. CVM-X: Calibrating contingent values with experimental auction markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80:455-465.
10. Greene W. 2000. Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Katzev R. 2003. Car sharing: A new approach to urban transportation problems. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 3(1):65-86.
12. Kearney A, De Young R. 1996. Changing commuter travel behavior: Employer-initiated strategies. Journal of Environmental System 24(4):373-393.
13. Koch H. 2001. User needs report: MoSUS (Mobility Services for Urban Sustainability) Project, DG TREN (Directorate General for Energy and Transport), European Commission, http://www.communauto.com/images/Moses_USER_NEEDS_REPORT_new.pdf. Accessed February 2007.
14. Kockelman KM. 1997. Travel behavior as a function of accessibility, land use mixing, and land use balance: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transportation Research Record 1607:117-125.
15. List JA, Gallet C. 2001. What experimental protocol influence disparities between actual and hypothetical stated values? Environmental and Resource Economics 20:241-254.
16. List JA, Shogren JF. 1998. Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 37:193-205.
17. Meijkamp R. 1998. Changing consumer behavior through eco-efficient services: An empirical study of car sharing in the Netherlands. Business Strategy and the Environment 7(4):234-244.
18. Morency C, Trepanier M, Martin B. 2008. Object-oriented analysis of carsharing system. Transportation Research Record No. 2063:105-112.
19. Murphy JJ, Allen PG, Stevens TH, Weatherhead D. 2005. A meta-analysis of hyphothetical bias in stated preference valuation. Environmental and Resource Economics 30:313-325.
20. Rodier C, Shaheen SA. 2004. Carsharing and car-free housing: predicted travel, emission and economic benefits, a case study of the Sacramento, California region. Presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., January.
21. Schrank D, Lomax T. 2005. The 2005 Urban Mobility report. Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System. Available from http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/mobility_report_2005_wappx.pdf. Accessed February, 2007.
22. Shaheen S. 1999. Dynamics in behavioral adaptation to a transportation innovation: A case study of carlink-a smart carsharing system. Institute of Transportation Studies. Paper UCD-ITS-RP-99-16. http://repositories.cdlib.org/itsdavis/UCD-ITS-RP-99-16
23. Shaheen S, Sperling D, Wagner C. 1998. Carsharing in Europe and North America: Past present and future. Transportation Quarterly 52(3):35-52.
24. Shaheen S, Schwartz A, Wipyewski K. 2004. Policy considerations for carsharing and station cars: Monitoring growth, trends and overall impacts. Transportation Research Record 1887:128-136.
25. Shaheen SA, Rodier C. 2005. Travel effects of a suburban commuter carsharing service: CarLink case study. Transportation Research Record 1927:182-188.
26. Shaheen SA, Cohen AP. 2007. Worldwide carsharing growth: An international comparison. Transportation Research Record 1992:81-89.
27. Shaheen SA, Cohen AP, Roberts JD. 2006. Carsharing in North America: Market growth, current developments and future potential. Transportation Research Record 1986:116-124.
28. Shaheen SA, Cohen AP, Martin E. 2010. Carsharing parking policy: A review of North American practices and San Francisco Bay area case study. Presented at the 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., January.
29. Smith C, Spitz G. 2009. Internet access: Is everyone online yet and can we survey them there? Paper presented at the Transportation Research Board's Planning Applications conference. Houston, Texas.
30. Steininger K, Vogl C, Zettl R. 1996. Car-sharing organizations: The size of the market segment and revealed change in mobility behavior. Transport Policy 3(4):177-185.
31. Vägverket, 2003. Make space for car sharing. Available at http://www.communauto.com/images/03.coupures_de_presse/Vagverket2003.pdf. Accessed on October 2007.
32. Walsh MP. 1993. Highway vehicle activity trends and their implications for global warming: The United States in an international context. In: Greene DL, Santini DJ (eds.), Transportation and global climate change. Washington, D.C.: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy.