A discrimination-association model for decomposing component processes of the Implicit Association Test

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 393-404

  Stefanutti, Luca ^a   Robusto, Egidio ^a   Vianello, Michelangelo ^a   Anselmi, Pasquale ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Implicit Association Test; Implicit measure; Poisson process; Poisson race model

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHYSIOLOGY; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; REACTION TIME; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ASSOCIATION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; POISSON DISTRIBUTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REACTION TIME; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84878253501     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0272-3     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Andrews, S. (1992). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Lexical similarity or orthographic redundancy? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 234-254.
2. Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2006). Do features of stimuli influence IAT effects? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 163-176.
3. Broyden, C. G. (1970). The convergence of a class of double-rank minimization algorithms. Journal of the Institute of Mathematics and its Applications, 6, 76-90.
4. Conrey, F. R., Sherman, J. W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. J. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 469-487.
5. Evans, K. K., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). When categories collide: Accumulation of information about multiple categories in rapid scene perception. Psychological Science, 22, 739-746.
6. Fletcher, R. (1970). A new approach to variable metric algorithms. The Computer Journal, 13, 317-322.
7. Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2010). When old and frail is not the same: Dissociating category and stimulus effects in four implicit attitude measurement methods. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(3), 479-498.
8. Goldfarb, D. (1970). A family of variable metric updates derived by variational means. Mathematics of Computing, 24, 23-26.
9. Govan, C. L., & Williams, K. D. (2004). Reversing or eliminating IAT effects by changing the affective valence of the stimulus items. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357-365.
10. Gradshteyn, I. S., & Ryzhik, I. M. (2000). Table of integrals, series and products (6th ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
11. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1464-1480.
12. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197-216.
13. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 134, 420-425.
14. Hoaglin, D. C., Mosteller, F., & Tukey, J. W. (Eds.). (1983). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Klauer, K. C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(3), 353-368.
16. Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Bruin, R. (2004). Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 405-415.
17. Moore, D. S. (1986). Tests of chi-squared type. In R. B. D'Agostino & M. A. Stephens (Eds.), Goodness-of-fit techniques (pp. 63-95). New York: Marcel Dekker.
18. Nosek, B. A., Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 166-180.
19. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test: Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 133, 139-165.
20. Shanno, D. F. (1970). Conditioning of quasi-Newton methods for function minimization. Mathematics of Computing, 24, 647-656.
21. Sriram, N., & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). The brief Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 283-294.
22. Stefanutti, L., Heller, J., Anselmi, P., & Robusto, E., (2012). Assessing the local identifiability of probabilistic knowledge structures. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10. 3758/s13428-012-0187-z.
23. Steffens, M. C., & Plewe, I. (2001). Items' cross-category associations as a confounding factor in the Implicit Association Test. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48(2), 123-134.
24. Thornton, T. L., & Gilden, D. L. (2007). Parallel and serial processes in visual search. Psychological Review, 114(1), 71-103.
25. Townsend, J. T. (1990). Serial vs parallel processing: Sometimes they look like tweedledum and tweedledee but they can (and should) be distinguished. Psychological Science, 1, 46-54.
26. Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1983). Stochastic modeling of elementary psychological processes. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
27. van der Heijden, A. H. C. (1975). Some evidence for a limited capacity parallel self-terminating process in simple visual search tasks. Acta Psychologica, 39, 21-41.
28. van Zandt, T., Colonius, H., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). A comparison of two reaction time models applied to perceptual matching. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 7(2), 208-256.
29. Vandekerckhove, J., Tuerlinckx, F., & Lee, M. D. (2011). Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. Psychological Methods, 16(1), 44-62.