Assessing the local identifiability of probabilistic knowledge structures

Behavior Research Methods

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1197-1211

  Stefanutti, Luca ^a   Heller, Jürgen ^b   Anselmi, Pasquale ^a   Robusto, Egidio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Basic local independence model; Knowledge space theory; Local identifiability; Probabilistic knowledge structures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; KNOWLEDGE BASE; LOGIC; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

KNOWLEDGE BASES; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; LOGIC; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES;

EID: 84870506741     PISSN: 1554351X     EISSN: 15543528     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0187-z     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Bamber, D., & van Santen, J. P. H. (1985). How many parameters can a model have and still be testable? Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 29, 443-473.
2. Bamber, D., & van Santen, J. P. H. (2000). How to assess a model's testability and identifiability. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44, 20-40.
3. Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1985). Spaces for the assessment of knowledge. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 23, 175-196.
4. Doignon, J.-P., & Falmagne, J.-C. (1999). Knowledge spaces. New York, NY: Springer.
5. Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (1988a). A class of stochastic procedures for the assessment of knowledge. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 1-23.
6. Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (1988b). A Markovian procedure for assessing the state of a system. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32, 232-258.
7. Falmagne, J.-C., & Doignon, J.-P. (2011). Learning spaces. New York, NY: Springer.
8. Heller, J., & Repitsch, C. (2011). Exploiting prior information in stochastic knowledge assessment. Methodology Advance online publication. doi: 10. 1027/1614-2241/a000035.
9. Heller, J., & Wickelmaier, F. (2011). Parameter estimation in probabilistic knowledge structures. Manuscript in preparation.
10. Meyer, C. D. (2000). Matrix analysis and applied linear algebra. Philadelphia, PA: SIAM.
11. Schrepp, M. (2005). About the connection between knowledge structures and latent class models. Methodology, 1, 93-103.
12. Smith, P. L. (1998). Attention and luminance detection: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 105-133. doi: 10. 1037/0096-1523. 24. 1. 105.
13. Stefanutti, L., & Robusto, E. (2009). Recovering a probabilistic knowledge structure by constraining its parameter space. Psychometrika, 74, 83-96.
14. Ünlü, A. (2011). A note on the connection between knowledge structures and latent class models. Methodology, 7, 63-67.