Infrared neural stimulation in the cochlea

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 8565, Issue , 2013, Pages

  Richter, Claus Peter ^a,b   Rajguru, Suhrud ^c,d   Bendett, Mark ^e  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Northwestern University   (United States)

^c University of Miami College of Engineering   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Lockheed Martin Aculight   (United States)

Author keywords

Cochlear implants; Infrared neural stimulation; Optical stimulation; Optogenetics; Thermogenetics

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC INFORMATION; ELECTRICAL STIMULATIONS; LIGHT-TISSUE INTERACTION; NEURAL STIMULATIONS; OPTICAL STIMULATION; OPTOGENETICS; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE; THERMOGENETICS;

CELL MEMBRANES; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; INFRARED RADIATION; NEURONS; TISSUE;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY;

EID: 84878206147     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.2010337     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (71)

1. Spahr A.J., et al. Simulating the effects of spread of electric excitation on musical tuning and melody identification with a cochlear implant. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2008. 51(6): p. 1599-606.
2. McDermott H.J. Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif 2004. 8(2): p. 49-82.
3. O'Leary S.J. R.R. Richardson and H.J. McDermott Principles of design and biological approaches for improving the selectivity of cochlear implant electrodes. J Neural Eng 2009. 6(5): p. 055002.
4. Drennan W.R. and J.T. Rubinstein Music perception in cochlear implant users and its relationship with psychophysical capabilities. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008. 45(5): p. 779-89.
5. Won J.H., et al. Improving performance in noise for hearing aids and cochlear implants using coherent modulation filtering. Hear Res 2008. 239(1-2): p. 1-11.
6. Shannon R.V. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. II. Channel interaction. Hear Res 1983. 12(1): p. 1-16.
7. Shannon R.V. Forward masking in patients with cochlear implants. J Acoust Soc Am 1990. 88(2): p. 741-4.
8. Busby P.A., et al. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J Acoust Soc Am 1994. 95(5 Pt 1): p. 2658-69.
9. Collins L.M. T.A. Zwolan and G.H. Wakefield Comparison of electrode discrimination pitch ranking and pitch scaling data in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant subjects. J Acoust Soc Am 1997. 101(1): p. 440-55.
10. Busby P.A. and G.M. Clark Pitch and loudness estimation for single and multiple pulse per period electric pulse rates by cochlear implant patients. J Acoust Soc Am 1997. 101(3): p. 1687-95.
11. Chatterjee M. and R.V. Shannon Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J Acoust Soc Am 1998. 103(5 Pt 1): p. 2565-72.
12. Pfingst B.E., et al. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants. Hear Res 1999. 134(1-2): p. 105-15.
13. Shannon R.V. Q.J. Fu and J. Galvin 3rd The number of spectral channels required for speech recognition depends on the difficulty of the listening situation. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 2004(552): p. 50-4.
14. Lawson D. Speech processors of auditory prostheses. Third quaterly progress report NIH Contract No1-DC- 5-2103 1996.
15. Fishman K.E. R.V. Shannon and W.H. Slattery Speech recognition as a function of the number of electrodes used in the SPEAK cochlear implant speech processor. J Speech Lang Hear Res 1997. 40(5): p. 1201-15.
16. Shannon R.V., et al. Speech perception with cochlear implants. in Cochlear implants: Auditory protheses and electric hearing. F.-G. Zheng A.N. Popper and R.R. Fay Editors. 2006 Springer: New York. p. 334-376.
17. Dowell R.C., et al. Speech perception using a two formant 22-electrode cochlear prosthesis in quiet and in noise. Acta Otolaryngol 1987. 104(5-6): p. 439-446.
18. Dorman M.F., et al. Consonant recognition as a function of the number of channels of stimulation by patients who use the Symbion cochlear implant. Ear and hearing 1989. 10: p. 288-291.
19. Dorman M.F., et al. The recognition of sentences in noise by normal-hearing listeners using stimulations of cochlear-implant signal processors with 6-20 channels. JASA 1998. 104: p. 3583-3585.
20. Bierer J.A. and J.C. Middlebrooks Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: dependence on electrode configuration. J Neurophysiol 2002. 87: p. 478-492.
21. Snyder R.L. J.A. Bierer and J.C. Middlebrooks Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. JARO 2004. 5: p. 305-322.
22. Mens L.H. and C.K. Berenstein Speech perception with mono- and quadrupolar electrode configurations: a crossover study. Otol Neurotol 2005. 26(5): p. 957-64.
23. Srinivasan A.G. D.M. Landsberger and R.V. Shannon Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hearing research 2010. 270(1-2): p. 89-100.
24. Koch D.B., et al. Using current steering to increase spectral resolution in CII and HiRes 90K users. Ear and hearing 2007. 28(2 Suppl): p. 38S-41S.
25. Berenstein C.K., et al. Current steering and current focusing in cochlear implants: comparison of monopolar tripolar and virtual channel electrode configurations. Ear and hearing 2008. 29(2): p. 250-60.
26. Choi C.T. and C.H. Hsu Conditions for generating virtual channels in cochlear prosthesis systems. Annals of biomedical engineering 2009. 37(3): p. 614-24.
27. Landsberger D.M. and A.G. Srinivasan Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hearing research 2009. 254(1-2): p. 34-41.
28. Veraart C. W.M. Grill and J.T. Mortimer Selective control of muscle activation with a multipolar nerve cuff electrode. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1993. 40: p. 640-653.
29. Polasek K.H., et al. Stimulation stability and selectivity of chronically implanted multicontact nerve cuff electrodes in the human upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2009. 17(5): p. 428-437.
30. Veraart C., et al. Visual sensations produced by optic nerve stimulation using an implanted self-sizing spiral cuff electrode. Brain Res 1998. 813: p. 181-186.
31. Larsen J.O., et al. Degeneration and regeneration in rabbit peripheral nerve with long-term nerve cuff electrode implant: a stereological study of myelinated and unmyelinated axons. Acta Neuropathol 1998. 96: p. 365-378.
32. Grill W.M. and J.T. Mortimer Neural and connective tissue response to long-term implantation of multiple contact nerve cuff electrodes. J Biomed Mater Res 2000. 50: p. 215-226.
33. Bowman B.R. and R.C. Erickson Acute and chronic implantation of coiled wire intraneural electrodes during cyclical electrical stimulation. Ann Biomed Eng 1985. 13: p. 75-93.
34. Lefurge T., et al. Chronically implanted intrafasicular recording electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng 1991. 19: p. 197-207.
35. Wells J., et al. Application of infrared light for in vivo neural stimulation. J Biomed Opt 2005. 10(6): p. 064003.
36. Wells J.D. Konrad P. Kao C. Jansen E.D. Mahadevan-Jansen A. Pulsed laser versus electrical energy for peripheral nerve stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 2006. 163(2): p. 326-37.
37. Yizhar O., et al. Optogenetics in Neural Systems. Neuron 2011. 9-34.
38. Dittami G.M., et al. Intracellular calcium transients evoked by pulsed infrared radiation in neonatal cardiomyocytes. J Physiol 2011. 589(6): p. 1295-306.
39. Rajguru S.M., et al. Infrared Photostimulation of the Crista Ampullaris. J Physiol 2011. 589(6): p. 1283-94.
40. Wells J.D., et al. Biophysical mechanisms of transient optical stimulation of peripheral nerve. Biophys J 2007.
41. Bernstein J.G. P.A. Garrity and E.S. Boyden Optogenetics and thermogenetics: technologies for controlling the activity of targeted cells within intact neural circuits. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2012. 22(1): p. 61-71.
42. Boyden E.S. A history of optogenetics: the development of tools for controlling brain circuits with light. F1000 biology reports 2011. 3: p. 11.
43. Chen Q. Z. Zeng and Z. Hu Optogenetics in neuroscience: what we gain from studies in mammals. Neuroscience bulletin 2012. 28(4): p. 423-34.
44. Zhang F., et al. The Microbial Opsin Family of Optogenetic Tools. Cell 2012. 147: p. 1446-1457.
45. Oesterhelt D. and W. Stoeckenius Functions of a new photoreceptor membrane. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 1973. 70(10): p. 2853-7.
46. Oesterhelt D. and W. Stoeckenius Rhodopsin-like protein from the purple membrane of Halobacterium halobium. Nature: New biology 1971. 233(39): p. 149-52.
47. Boyden E.S., et al. Millisecond-timescale genetically targeted optical control of neural activity. Nature neuroscience 2005. 8(9): p. 1263-8.
48. Degenaar P., et al. Optobionic vision-a new genetically enhanced light on retinal prosthesis. Journal of neural engineering 2009. 6(3): p. 035007.
49. Grossman N., et al. High-frequency limit of neural stimulation with ChR2. Conference proceedings : .. Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Conference 2011. 2011: p. 4167-70.
50. Grossman N., et al. Modeling study of the light stimulation of a neuron cell with channelrhodopsin-2 mutants. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 2011. 58(6): p. 1742-51.
51. Li X., et al. Fast noninvasive activation and inhibition of neural and network activity by vertebrate rhodopsin and green algae channelrhodopsin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2005. 102(49): p. 17816-21.
52. Ishizuka T., et al. Kinetic evaluation of photosensitivity in genetically engineered neurons expressing green algae light-gated channels. Neuroscience research 2006. 54(2): p. 85-94.
53. Arenkiel B.R., et al. In vivo light-induced activation of neural circuitry in transgenic mice expressing channelrhodopsin-2. Neuron 2007. 54(2): p. 205-18.
54. Gunaydin L.A., et al. Ultrafast optogenetic control. Nature neuroscience 2010. 13(3): p. 387-92.
55. Lin J.Y., et al. Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with improved properties and kinetics. Biophysical journal 2009. 96(5): p. 1803-14.
56. Kleinlogel S., et al. Ultra light-sensitive and fast neuronal activation with the Ca(2)+-permeable channelrhodopsin CatCh. Nature neuroscience 2011. 14(4): p. 513-8.
57. Suh E., et al. Optical stimulation in mice which lack the TRPV1 channel. Proc. of SPIE 2009. 7180: p. 71800S 1-5.
58. Albert E.S., et al. TRPV4 channels mediate the infrared laser evoked response in sensory neurons. J Neurophysiol 2011. doi:10.1152/jn.00424.2011.
59. Richter C.P., et al. Neural stimulation with optical radiation. Laser & photonics reviews 2011. 5(1): p. 68-80.
60. Goyal V., et al. Acute damage threshold for infrared neural stimulation of the cochlea: functional and histological evaluation. Anatomical record 2012. 295(11): p. 1987-99.
61. McCaughey R.G. C. Chlebicki and B.J. Wong Novel wavelengths for laser nerve stimulation. Lasers Surg Med 2010. 42(1): p. 69-75.
62. Fried N.M., et al. Laser stimulation of the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate in vivo: optimization of wavelength pulse energy and pulse repetition rate. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008. 2008: p. 2777- 80.
63. Fried N.M., et al. Noncontact stimulation of the cavernous nerves in the rat prostate using a tunablewavelength thulium fiber laser. J Endourol 2008. 22(3): p. 409-13.
64. McCaughey R.G. C. Chlebicki and B.J. Wong Novel wavelengths for laser nerve stimulation. Laser Surg Med 2009.
65. Richter C.P., et al. Spread of cochlear excitation during stimulation with pulsed infrared radiation: inferior colliculus measurements. Journal of neural engineering 2011. 8(5): p. 056006.
66. Wenzel G.I., et al. Green laser light activates the inner ear. Journal of biomedical optics 2009. 14(4): p. 044007.
67. Zhang K.Y., et al. Optoacoustic induced vibrations within the inner ear. OPTICS EXPRESS 2009. 17(25): p. 23037-43.
68. Teudt I.U., et al. Acoustic events and "optophonic" cochlear responses induced by pulsed near-infrared laser. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering 2011. 58(6): p. 1648-55.
69. Schultz M., et al. Nanosecond laser pulse stimulation of the inner ear-a wavelength study. Biomedical optics express 2012. 3(12): p. 3332-45.
70. Teudt I.U., et al. Acoustic events and "optophonic" cochlear responses induced by pulsed near infrared LASER. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011: p. PMID: 212780111
71. Shapiro M.G., et al. Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance. Nature Communications 2012. 3: p. 736.