Navigation of the tibial plateau alone appears to be sufficient in computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

International Orthopaedics

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 2479-2483

  Saragaglia, Dominique ^a   Picard, Frédéric ^b   Refaie, Ramsay ^c  

^a Grenoble South Teaching Hospital   (France)

^b GOLDEN JUBILEE NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c WANSBECK GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AVASCULAR NECROSIS; CAMERA; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEMALE; HIP KNEE ANKLE ANGLE; HUMAN; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; KNEE IMPLANT; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; MALE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ORTHOPEDIC SOFTWARE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIBIA; TIBIAL MECHANICAL ANGLE; TIBIAL PLATEAU; TREATMENT PLANNING; UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; WEIGHT BEARING; ANKLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EQUIPMENT; EVALUATION; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HIP; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE PROSTHESIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANKLE JOINT; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD NECROSIS; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SOFTWARE; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84878193782     PISSN: 03412695     EISSN: 14325195     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-012-1679-2     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Borus T, Thornhill T (2008) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:9-18
2. Marmor L (1982) The Marmor knee replacement. Orthop Clin North Am 13:55-64
3. Cartier P, Cheaib S (1987) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 2-10 years of follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2:157-162
4. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (1996) Prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(Suppl 1):23-60
5. Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161-165
6. Scott RD (2006) Three decades of experience with unicompartmental arthroplasty: mistakes made and lessons learned. Orthopedics 29:829-831
7. Mercier N, Wimsey S, Saragaglia D (2010) Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:1137-1143
8. Neyret P, Chatain F, Deschamps G (1996) Matériel et options dans les prothèses unicompartimentales du genou. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 82(Suppl 1):48-52
9. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2001) Implantation d'une prothèse totale de genou assistée par ordinateur. Etude comparative cas-témoin avec une instrumentation traditionnelle. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:645-652
10. Saragaglia D, Picard F, Chaussard C, Montbarbon E, Leitner F, Cinquin P (2001) Mise en place des prothèses totale du genou assistée par ordinateur: comparaison avec la technique conventionnelle. A propos d'une étude prospective randomisée de 50 cas. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 87:18-28
11. Saragaglia D, Chaussard C, Rubens-Duval B (2006) Navigation as a predictor of soft tissue release during 90 cases of computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics 29(10 Suppl):S137-S138
12. Ayach A, Plaweski S, Saragaglia D (2009) Computer-assisted uni knee arthroplasty for genu varum deformity. Results of axial correction in a case-control study of 40 cases. In 9th annual meeting of CAOS-International proceedings. Wingspan, Livermore, pp 4-7
13. Cossey AJ, Spriggins J (2005) The use of computer-assisted surgical navigation to prevent malalignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:29-34
14. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:40-45
15. Jenny JY (2008) Navigated unicompartmental knee replacement. Sports Med Arthrosc 16:103-107
16. Jung KA, Kim SJ, Lee SC, Hwang SH, Ahn NK (2010) Accuracy of implantation during computer-assisted minimally invasive Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison with a conventional instrumented technique. Knee 17:387-391
17. Perlick L, Bäthis H, Tingart M, Perlick C, Lüring C, Grifka J (2004) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement with a nonimage-based navigation system. Int Orthop 28:193-197
18. Rosenberger RE, Fink C, Quirbach S, Attal R, Tecklenburg K, Hoser C (2008) The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:1133-1140
19. Jenny JY, Boeri C (2002) Accuracy of implantation of a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with 2 different instrumentations: a case-controlled comparative study. J Arthroplasty 17:1016-1020
20. Larsson SE, Larsson S, Lundkvist S (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective consecutive series followed for six to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:174-181
21. Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ, Engh GA (2002) The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:351-355
22. Seon JK, Song EK, Park SJ, Yoon TR, Lee KB, Jung ST (2009) Comparison of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with or without a navigation system. J Arthroplasty 24:351-357
23. Lim MH, Tallay A, Bartlett J (2009) Comparative study of the use of computer assisted navigation system for axial correction in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:341-346