Correlation study between KSS, WOMAC and SF-36 scores in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a spanish speaking population

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 950-953

  Torres Claramunt, Raúl ^a   Leal, Joan ^a   Hinarejos, Pedro ^a   Pelfort, Xavier ^a   Puig, Lluis ^a  

^a Orthopaedic Department   (Spain)

Author keywords

Correlation; KSS; SF 36; TKA; WOMAC

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KNEE SOCIETY SCORE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO AND MCMASTER UNIVERSITIES OSTEOARTHRITIS INDEX;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SPAIN;

EID: 84878176935     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.10.012     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Callahan C.M., Drake B.G., Heck D.A., et al. Patient outcomes following unicompartmental or bicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:141.
2. Ewald F.C., Wright R.J., Poss R., et al. Kinematic total knee arthroplasty: a 10- to 14-year prospective follow-up review. J Arthroplasty 1999, 14:473.
3. Drake B.G., Callahan C.M., Dittus R.S., et al. Global rating systems used in assessing knee arthroplasty outcomes. J Arthroplasty 1994, 9:409.
4. Muniesa J.M., Marco E., Tejero M., et al. Analysis of the expectations of elderly patients before undergoing total knee replacement. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2010.
5. Wright J.G., Santaguida P.L., Young N., et al. Patient preferences before and after total knee arthroplasty. J Clin Epidemiol 2010, 63:774. [Epub 2009 Dec 11].
6. Lingard E.A., Katz J.N., Wright R.J., et al. Validity and responsiveness of the knee society clinical rating system in comparison with the SF-36 and WOMAC. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001, 83:1856.
7. Ghanem E., Pawasarat I., Lindsay A., et al. Limitations of the knee society score in evaluating outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010, 92:2445.
8. Insall J.N., Dorr L.D., Scott R.D., et al. Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop 1989, 248:13.
9. Saleh K.J., Macaulay A., Radosevich D.M., et al. The Knee Society Index of Severity for failed total knee arthroplasty: development and validation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001, 392:153.
10. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Rogers W., et al. The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Med Care 1992, 30(5 Suppl):MS253.
11. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Raczek A.E. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care 1993, 31:247.
12. McHorney C.A., Ware J.E., Lu J.F., et al. The MOS 36-item Short- Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994, 32:40.
13. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473.
14. Bombardier C., Melfi C.A., Paul J., et al. Comparison of a generic and a disease-specific measure of pain and physical function after knee replacement surgery. Med Care 1995, 33(4 Suppl):AS131.
15. Bayley K.B., London M.R., Grunkemeier G.L., et al. Measuring the success of treatment in patient terms. Med Care 1995, 33(4 Suppl):AS226.
16. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol. 1988, 1:95.
17. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833.
18. Söderman P., Malchau H. Validity and reliability of Swedish WOMAC osteoarthritis index: a self-administrated disease-specific questionnaire (WOMAC) versus generic instruments (SF-36 and NHP). Acta Orhop Scand. 2000, 71:39.
19. Escobar A., Quintana J.M., Bilbao A., et al. Validation of the Spanish version of the WOMAC questionnaire for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 2002, 21:466.
20. Villanueva I., del Mar Guzman M., Javier Toyos F., et al. Relative efficiency and validity properties of a visual analogue vs a categorical scaled version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Index: Spanish versions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2004, 12:225.
21. López-García E., Banegas J.R., Graciani Pérez-Regadera A., et al. Population-based reference values for the Spanish version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the elderly. Med Clin (Barc) 2003, 120:568. [Spanish].
22. Ares O., Castellet E., Maculé F., et al. Translation and validation of "The Knee Society Clinical Rating System" into Spanish. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthorsc 2013, [Epub ahead of print].
23. Hawker G., Melfi C., Paul J., et al. Comparison of a generic (SF-36) and a disease specific (WOMAC) (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) instrument in the measurement of outcomes after knee replacements surgery. J Rheumatol 1995, 22:1193.
24. Dawson J., Fitzpatrick R., Murray D., et al. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998, 80:63.
25. Konig A., Shceidler M., Rader C., et al. The need for a dual rating system in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orothop. 1997, 345:161.
26. Dowsey M.M., Broadhead M.L., Choong P.F. Outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in English-versus non-English-speaking patients. J Orthop Surg 2009, 17:305.
27. Ethgen O., Bruyére O., Richy F., et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86:963.