Bayesian symbol-refined tree substitution grammars for syntactic parsing

50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2012 - Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2012, Pages 440-448

  Shindo, Hiroyuki ^a   Miyao, Yusuke ^b   Fujino, Akinori ^a   Nagata, Masaaki ^a  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISCRIMINATIVE RERANKING; MARKOV CHAIN MONTE CARLO; MODEL-BASED OPC; NON-TERMINAL SYMBOLS; SYNTACTIC PARSING; TRAINING METHODS; TREE SUBSTITUTION GRAMMARS; WALL STREET JOURNAL;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SYNTACTICS;

FORESTRY;

DATA; EDUCATION; TREES;

EID: 84878166911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Mohit Bansal and Dan Klein. 2010. Simple, Accurate Parsing with an All-Fragments Grammar. In In Proc. of ACL, pages 1098-1107.
2. Phil Blunsom and Trevor Cohn. 2010. Unsupervised Induction of Tree Substitution Grammars for Dependency Parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 1204-1213.
3. Eugene Charniak and Mark Johnson. 2005. Coarseto- Fine n-Best Parsing and MaxEnt Discriminative Reranking. In Proc. of ACL, 1:173-180.
4. Shay B Cohen, David M Blei, and Noah A Smith. 2010. Variational Inference for Adaptor Grammars. In In Proc. of HLT-NAACL, pages 564-572.
5. Trevor Cohn and Mirella Lapata. 2009. Sentence Compression as Tree Transduction. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 34:637-674.
6. Trevor Cohn, Phil Blunsom, and Sharon Goldwater. 2010. Inducing Tree-Substitution Grammars. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 11:3053-3096.
7. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-Driven Statistical Models for Natural Language Parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29:589-637.
8. Steve DeNeefe and Kevin Knight. 2009. Synchronous Tree Adjoining Machine Translation. In Proc. of EMNLP, page 727.
9. Thomas S Ferguson. 1973. A Bayesian Analysis of Some Nonparametric Problems. Annals of Statistics, 1:209-230.
10. Victoria Fossum and Kevin Knight. 2009. Combining Constituent Parsers. In Proc. of HLT-NAACL, pages 253-256.
11. Michel Galley, Mark Hopkins, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Los Angeles, and Marina Del Rey. 2004. What's in a Translation Rule? Information Sciences, pages 273-280.
12. Liang Huang. 2008. Forest Reranking : Discriminative Parsing with Non-Local Features. In Proc. of ACL, 19104:0.
13. Mark Johnson and Sharon Goldwater. 2009. Improving nonparameteric Bayesian inference: experiments on unsupervised word segmentation with adaptor grammars. In In Proc. of HLT-NAACL, pages 317-325.
14. Mark Johnson, Thomas L Griffiths, and Sharon Goldwater. 2007a. Adaptor Grammars : A Framework for Specifying Compositional Nonparametric Bayesian Models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19, 19:641-648.
15. Mark Johnson, Thomas L Griffiths, and Sharon Goldwater. 2007b. Bayesian Inference for PCFGs via Markov chain Monte Carlo. In In Proc. of HLT-NAACL, pages 139-146.
16. Mark Johnson. 1998. PCFG Models of Linguistic Tree Representations. Computational Linguistics, 24:613- 632.
17. Dan Klein and Christopher D Manning. 2003. Accurate Unlexicalized Parsing. In Proc. of ACL, 1:423-430.
18. K Lari and S J Young. 1991. Applications of Stochastic Context-Free Grammars Using the Inside-Outside Algorithm. Computer Speech and Language, 5:237- 257.
19. Mitchell P Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a Large Annotated Corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
20. Takuya Matsuzaki, Yusuke Miyao, and Jun'ichi Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic CFG with latent annotations. In Proc. of ACL, pages 75-82.
21. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning Accurate, Compact, and Interpretable Tree Annotation. In Proc. of ACL, pages 433-440.
22. Slav Petrov. 2010. Products of Random Latent Variable Grammars. In Proc. of HLT-NAACL, pages 19-27.
23. Jim Pitman and Marc Yor. 1997. The two-parameter Poisson-Dirichlet distribution derived from a stable subordinator. The Annals of Probability, 25:855-900.
24. Matt Post and Daniel Gildea. 2009. Bayesian Learning of a Tree Substitution Grammar. In In Proc. of ACLIJCNLP, pages 45-48.
25. Yee Whye Teh. 2006a. A Bayesian Interpretation of Interpolated Kneser-Ney. NUS School of Computing Technical Report TRA2/06.
26. YW Teh. 2006b. A Hierarchical Bayesian Language Model based on Pitman-Yor Processes. In Proc. of ACL, 44:985-992.
27. J Tenenbaum, TJ O'Donnell, and ND Goodman. 2009. Fragment Grammars: Exploring Computation and Reuse in Language. MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Technical Report Series.
28. Mengqiu Wang, Noah A Smith, and Teruko Mitamura. 2007. What is the Jeopardy Model ? A Quasi- Synchronous Grammar for QA. In Proc. of EMNLPCoNLL, pages 22-32.
29. Elif Yamangil and Stuart M Shieber. 2010. Bayesian Synchronous Tree-Substitution Grammar Induction and Its Application to Sentence Compression. In In Proc. of ACL, pages 937-947.
30. Hui Zhang, Min Zhang, Chew Lim Tan, and Haizhou Li. 2009. K-Best Combination of Syntactic Parsers. In Proc. of EMNLP, pages 1552-1560.
31. Willem Zuidema. 2007. Parsimonious Data-Oriented Parsing. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 551-560.