Synchronous Tree Adjoining machine translation

EMNLP 2009 - Proceedings of the 2009 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: A Meeting of SIGDAT, a Special Interest Group of ACL, Held in Conjunction with ACL-IJCNLP 2009

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 727-736

  DeNeefe, Steve ^a   Knight, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTEXT SENSITIVE GRAMMARS; FORESTRY; SYNCHRONOUS MACHINERY; SYNTACTICS; TRANSLATION (LANGUAGES); TREES (MATHEMATICS);

GENERAL TRANSLATION; MACHINE TRANSLATIONS; PRACTICAL SYSTEMS; SYNCHRONOUS TREE-ADJOINING GRAMMARS; TRAINING DATA; TRANSLATION QUALITY; TREE ADJOINING GRAMMARS; TREE TRANSDUCERS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 80053238364     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1699571.1699607     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Anne Abeille, Yves Schabes, and Aravind K. Joshi. 1990. Using lexicalized TAGs for machine translation. In Proc. COLING, volume 3.
2. David Chiang. 2003. Statistical parsing with an automatically extracted tree adjoining grammar. Data-Oriented Parsing.
3. Michael Collins. 2003. Head-driven statistical models for natural language parsing. Computational Linguistics, 29(4).
4. Steve DeNeefe, Kevin Knight, Wei Wang, and Daniel Marcu. 2007. What can syntax-based MT learn from phrase-based MT? In Proc. EMNLP-CoNLL.
5. Alexander Fraser and Daniel Marcu. 2007. Getting the structure right for word alignment: LEAF. In Proc. EMNLP-CoNLL.
6. Michel Galley, Mark Hopkins, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2004. What's in a translation rule? In Proc. HLT-NAACL.
7. Michel Galley, Jonathan Graehl, Kevin Knight, Daniel Marcu, Steve DeNeefe, Wei Wang, and Ignacio Thayer. 2006. Scalable inference and training of context-rich syntactic translation models. In Proc. ACL.
8. Aravind K. Joshi, L. S. Levy, and M. Takahashi. 1975. Tree adjunct grammars. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 10(1).
9. Aravind K. Joshi. 1985. How much contextsensitivity is necessary for characterizing structural descriptions-tree adjoining grammars. Natural Language Processing-Theoretical, Computational, and Psychological Perspectives.
10. Alon Lavie, Alok Parlikar, and Vamshi Ambati. 2008. Syntax-driven learning of sub-sentential translation equivalents and translation rules from parsed parallel corpora. In Proc. SSST.
11. Daniel Marcu, Wei Wang, Abdessamad Echihabi, and Kevin Knight. 2006. SPMT: Statistical machine translation with syntactified target language phrases. In Proc. EMNLP.
12. Mitchell P. Marcus, Beatrice Santorini, and Mary Ann Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2).
13. José B. Mariño, Rafael E. Banchs, Josep M. Crego, Adrià de Gispert, Patrik Lambert, José A. R. Fonollosa, and Marta R. Costa-jussà. 2006. N-grambased machine translation. Computational Linguistics, 32(4).
14. Rebecca Nesson, Stuart M. Shieber, and Alexander Rush. 2006. Induction of probabilistic synchronous tree-insertion grammars for machine translation. In Proc. AMTA.
15. Franz Josef Och. 2003. Minimum error rate training in statistical machine translation. In Proc. ACL.
16. Yves Schabes and Richard C. Waters. 1995. Tree insertion grammar: A cubic-time, parsable formalism that lexicalizes context-free grammar without changing the trees produced. Computational Linguistics, 21(4).
17. Stuart M. Shieber and Yves Schabes. 1990. Synchronous tree-adjoining grammars. In Proc. COLING.
18. Stuart M. Shieber. 2007. Probabilistic synchronous tree-adjoining grammars for machine translation: The argument from bilingual dictionaries. In Proc. SSST Wkshp., NAACL-HLT.
19. Kumar Vijay-Shanker. 1987. A study of tree adjoining grammars. Ph.D. thesis.
20. Wei Wang, Kevin Knight, and Daniel Marcu. 2007. Binarizing syntax trees to improve syntax-based machine translation accuracy. In Proc. EMNLP and CoNLL.