Parsimonious data-oriented parsing

EMNLP-CoNLL 2007 - Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 551-560

  Zuidema, Willem ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA-ORIENTED PARSING; EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTIONS; SUBTREES; TEST SETS; TREEBANKS;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; PLANT EXTRACTS;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 77953193320     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Rens Bod. 1998. Beyond Grammar: An experiencebased theory of language. CSLI, Stanford, CA.
2. Rens Bod. 2001. What is the minimal set of fragments that achieves maximal parse accuracy? In Proceedings ACL-2001.
3. Rens Bod. 2003. An efficient implementation of a new DOP model. In Proceedings EACL'03.
4. Rens Bod. 2006. An all-subtrees approach to unsupervised parsing. Proceedings ACL-COLING'06.
5. Eugene Charniak. 1996. Tree-bank grammars. Technical report, Department of Computer Science, Brown University.
6. Eugene Charniak. 1997. Statistical parsing with a context-free grammar and word statistics. In Proceedings of the fourteenth national conference on artificial intelligence, Menlo Park. AAAI Press/MIT Press.
7. Michael Collins and Nigel Duffy. 2002. New ranking algorithms for parsing and tagging: Kernels over discrete structures, and the voted perceptron. In Proceedings ACL 2002.
8. Michael Collins. 1997. Three generative, lexicalized models for statistical parsing. In Philip R. Cohen and Wolfgang Wahlster, editors, Proceedings ACL'97, pages 16-23.
9. Joshua Goodman. 1996. Efficient algorithms for parsing the DOP model. In Proceedings EMNLP, pages 143-152.
10. Mark Johnson. 1998. PCFG models of linguistic tree representations. Computational Linguistics, 24(4):613-632. (Pubitemid 128455527)
11. Mark Johnson. 2002. The DOP estimation method is biased and inconsistent. Computational Linguistics, 28(1):71-76.
12. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings ACL'03.
13. M.P. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M.A. Marcinkiewicz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19(2).
14. T. Matzuzaki, Y. Miyao, and J. Tsujii. 2005. Probabilistic CFG with latent annotations. In Proceedings ACL'05, pages 75-82.
15. Slav Petrov, Leon Barrett, Romain Thibaux, and Dan Klein. 2006. Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In Proceedings ACLCOLING' 06, pages 443.440.
16. Detlef Prescher. 2005. Inducing head-driven PCFGs with latent heads: Refining a tree-bank grammar for parsing. In Proceedings ECML'05.
17. Remko Scha. 1990. Taaltheorie en taaltechnologie; competence en performance. In R. de Kort and G.L.J. Leerdam, editors, Computertoepassingen in de Neerlandistiek, pages 7-22. LVVN, Almere, the Netherlands. English translation at http://iaaa.nl/rs/LeerdamE.html.
18. Helmut Schmid. 2004. Effcient parsing of highly ambiguous context-free grammars with bit vectors. In Proceedings COLING 2004.
19. Helmut Schmid. 2006. Trace prediction and recovery with unlexicalized PCFGs and slash features. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL 2006.
20. Khalil Sima'an. 2002. Computational complexity of probabilistic disambiguation. Grammars, 5(2):125-151.
21. Khalil Sima'an and Luciano Buratto. 2003. Backoff parameter estimation for the DOP model. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Machine Learning (ECML'03, Cavtat-Dubrovnik, Croatia, number 2837 in Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 373-384. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany. (Pubitemid 37230992)
22. Gert Veldhuijzen van Zanten, Gosse Bouma, Khalil Sima'an, Gertjan van Noord, and Remko Bonnema. 1999. Evaluation of the NLP components of the OVIS2 spoken dialogue system. In van Eynde, Schuurman, and Schelkens, editors, Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands 1998, pages 213-229. Rodopi, Amsterdam.
23. Andreas Zollmann and Khalil Sima'an. 2005. A consistent and effcient estimator for data-oriented parsing. Journal of Automata, Languages and Combinatorics, 10(2/3):367-388.
24. Willem Zuidema. 2006a. Theoretical evaluation of estimation methods for Data-Oriented Parsing. In Proceedings EACL 2006 (Conference Companion), pages 183-186. Association for Computational Linguistics. Erratum on http://staff.science.uva.nl/.jzuidema/research.
25. Willem Zuidema. 2006b. What are the productive units of natural language grammar? A DOP approach to the automatic identi-cation of constructions. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CONLL-X).