Femoral neck cross-sectional geometry and exercise loading

Clinical Physiology and Functional Imaging

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 258-266

  Narra, Nathaniel ^a,b   Nikander, Riku ^c   Viik, Jari ^a,b   Hyttinen, Jari ^a,b   Sievänen, Harri ^d  

^a TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^c HELSINKI METROPOLIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Finland)

^d UKK INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH PROMOTION RESEARCH   (Finland)

Author keywords

Bone geometry; Bone strength; Cortical bone; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sports

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATHLETE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ENDURANCE SPORT; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; FUNCTIONAL ANATOMY; HUMAN; JOINT CAPSULE; JUMPING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACQUET SPORT; RUNNING; SOCCER; SWIMMING; WEIGHT BEARING; WEIGHT LIFTING;

ATHLETES; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FEMUR NECK; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 84878130864     PISSN: 14750961     EISSN: 1475097X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cpf.12022     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Barratt DC, Chan CSK, Edwards PJ, Penney GP, Slomczykowski M, Carter TJ, Hawkes DJ. Instantiation and registration of statistical shape models of the femur and pelvis using 3D ultrasound imaging. Med Image Anal (2008); 12: 358-374.
2. Bass SL, Saxon L, Daly RM, Turner CH, Robling AG, Seeman E, Stuckey S. The effect of mechanical loading on the size and shape of bone in pre-, peri-, and postpubertal girls: a study in tennis players. J Bone Miner Res (2002); 17: 2274-2280.
3. Daly RM, Bass SL. Lifetime sport and leisure activity participation is associated with greater bone size, quality and strength in older men. Osteoporos Int (2006); 17: 1258-1267.
4. Duncan RL. Mechanotransduction and the functional response of bone to mechanical strain. Calcif Tissue Int (1995); 57: 344-358.
5. Frost HM. Bone 'mass' and the 'mechanostat': a proposal. The Anatomical record (1987); 219: 1-9.
6. van de Giessen M, Foumani M, Streekstra GJ, Strackee SD, Maas M, Van Vliet LJ, Grimbergen K, Vos FM. Statistical descriptions of scaphoid and lunate bone shapes. J Biomech (2010); 43: 1463-1469.
7. Griffith JF, Genant HK. New imaging modalities in bone. Curr Rheumatol Rep (2011); 13: 241-250.
8. Heimann T, Meinzer H-P. Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: a review. Med Image Anal (2009); 13: 543-563.
9. Heinonen A, Sievänen H, Kyröläinen H, Perttunen J, Kannus P. Mineral mass, size, and estimated mechanical strength of triple jumpers' lower limb. Bone (2001); 29: 279-285.
10. Johannesdottir F, Poole KES, Reeve J, Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Mogensen B, Jonsson BY, Sigurdsson S, Harris TB, Gudnason VG, Sigurdsson G. Distribution of cortical bone in the femoral neck and hip fracture: a prospective case-control analysis of 143 incident hip fractures; the AGES-REYKJAVIK Study. Bone (2011); 48: 1268-1276.
11. Kazakia GJ, Majumdar S. New imaging technologies in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord (2006); 7: 67-74.
12. Klein-Nulend J, Bakker AD. Osteocytes: mechanosensors of Bone and Orchestrators of Mechanical Adaptation. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab (2008); 5: 195-209.
13. Manske SL, Macdonald HM, Nishiyama KK, Boyd SK, McKay HA. Clinical Tools to Evaluate Bone Strength. Clin Rev Bone Miner Metab (2010); 8: 122-134.
14. Mayhew PM, Thomas CD, Clement JG, Loveridge N, Beck TJ, Bonfield W, Burgoyne CJ, Reeve J. Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk. Lancet (2005); 366: 129-135.
15. Mourtada FA, Beck TJ, Hauser DL, Ruff CB, Bao G. Curved beam model of the proximal femur for estimating stress using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry derived structural geometry. J Orthop Res (1996); 14: 483-492.
16. Nikander R, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Kannus P. Femoral neck structure in adult female athletes subjected to different loading modalities. J Bone Miner Res (2005); 20: 520-528.
17. Nikander R, Sievänen H, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Kannus P. Loading modalities and bone structures at nonweight-bearing upper extremity and weight-bearing lower extremity: a pQCT study of adult female athletes. Bone (2006); 39: 886-894.
18. Nikander R, Kannus P, Dastidar P, Hannula M, Harrison L, Cervinka T, Narra NG, Aktour R, Arola T, Eskola H, Soimakallio S, Heinonen A, Hyttinen J, Sievänen H. Targeted exercises against hip fragility. Osteoporos Int (2009); 20: 1321-1328.
19. Nikander R, Kannus P, Rantalainen T, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Sievänen H. Cross-sectional geometry of weight-bearing tibia in female athletes subjected to different exercise loadings. Osteoporos Int (2010a); 21: 1687-1694.
20. Nikander R, Sievänen H, Heinonen A, Daly RM, Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P. Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Medicine (2010b); 8: 47.
21. Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH. Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng (2006); 8: 455-498.
22. Sievänen H. A physical model for dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-derived bone mineral density. Invest Radiol (2000); 35: 325-330.
23. Sievänen H, Józsa L, Pap I, Järvinen M, Järvinen TA, Kannus P, Järvinen TL. Fragile external phenotype of modern human proximal femur in comparison with medieval bone. J Bone Miner Res (2007); 22: 537-543.
24. Turner CH. Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. Bone (1998); 23: 399-407.
25. Turner CH, Pavalko FM. Mechanotransduction and functional response of the skeleton to physical stress: the mechanisms and mechanics of bone adaptation. J Orthop Sci (1998); 3: 346-355.
26. Verhulp E, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R. Load distribution in the healthy and osteoporotic human proximal femur during a fall to the side. Bone (2008); 42: 30-35.
27. Yushkevich PA, Piven J, Hazlett HC, Smith RG, Ho S, Gee JC, Gerig G. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability. NeuroImage (2006); 31: 1116-1128.