Priorities, satisfaction and treatment goals in psychosis patients: An online consumer's survey

Pharmacopsychiatry

Volumn 46, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 88-93

  Sterk, B ^a,b   Winter Van Rossum, I ^c,d   Muis, M ^e   De Haan, L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d Lilly Netherlands BV   (Netherlands)

^e Vereniging Anoiksis (Association for People with Schizophrenia)   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

patient perspectives; psychosis; schizophrenia; treatment preferences; treatment satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CAREGIVER; DISEASE DURATION; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENTAL PATIENT; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT COUNSELING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOSIS; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SOCIAL INTERACTION;

ADULT; CAREGIVERS; FEMALE; GOALS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; ONLINE SYSTEMS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84878110267     PISSN: 01763679     EISSN: 14390795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327732     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Fischer E. P., Shumway M., Owen R. R. Priorities of consumers, providers, and family members in the treatment of schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv: 2002; 53 724 729
2. de Haan L., van Raaij B., van den Berg R. et al. Preferences for treatment during a first psychotic episode. Eur Psychiatry: 2001; 16 83 89
3. de Haan L., Kramer L., van Raay B. et al. Priorities and satisfaction on the help needed and provided in a first episode of psychosis. A survey in five European Family Associations. Eur Psychiatry: 2002; 17 425 433
4. Leavey G., King M., Cole E. et al. First-onset psychotic illness: patient's and relatives' satisfaction with services. Br J Psychiatry: 1997; 170 53 57
5. Rosenheck R., Stroup S., Keefe R. S. et al. Measuring outcome priorities and preferences in people with schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry: 2005; 187 529 536
6. Korver N., Quee P. J., Boos H. et al. Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) Investigators. genetic risk and outcome of psychosis, a multi site longitudinal cohort study focused on gene-environment interaction: objectives, sample characteristics, recruitment and assessment methods. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res: 2012; 10.1002/mpr.1352 [Epub ahead of print]
7. Reininghaus U., McCabe R., Burns T. et al. Measuring patients' views: a bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis. Psychol Med: 2011; 41 277 289
8. Drake R. E., Cimpean D., Torrey W. C. Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci: 2009; 11 455 463
9. Marshall M., Rathbone J. Early intervention for psychosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2011; 6 CD004718
10. Tunner T. P., Salzer M. S. Consumer perspectives on quality of care in the treatment of schizophrenia. Adm Policy Ment Health: 2006; 33 674 681
11. Mason K., Olmos-Gallo A., Bacon D. et al. Exploring the consumer's and provider's perspective on service quality in community mental health care. Community Mental Health J: 2004; 40 33 46
12. Lester H., Tritter J. Q., England E. Satisfaction with primary care: the perspectives of people with schizophrenia. Fam Pract: 2003; 20 508 513
13. Chue P. The relationship between patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes in schizophrenia. J Psychopharmacol: 2006; 20 6 suppl 38 56
14. Brewin C. R., Wing J. K., Mangen S. P. et al. Principles and practice of measuring needs in the long-term mentally ill: the MRC needs for care assessment. Psychol Med: 1987; 17 971 981
15. Svensson B., Hansson L. Patient satisfaction with inpatient psychiatric care. The influence of personality traits, diagnosis and perceived coercion. Acta Psychiatr Scand: 1994; 90 379 384
16. Hätönen H., Suhonen R., Warro H. et al. Patients' perceptions of patient education on psychiatric inpatient wards: a qualitative study. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs: 2010; 17 335 341
17. Mizrahi R., Bagby R. M., Zipursky R. B. et al. How antipsychotics work: the patients' perspective. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry: 2005; 29 859 864
18. Van Os J., Altamura A. C., Bobes J. et al. Evaluation of the two-way communication checklist as a clinical intervention. Results of a multinational, randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry: 2004; 184 79 83
19. Whitehead L. C. Methodological and ethical issues in Internet-mediated research in the field of health: An integrated review of the literature. Soc Sci Med: 2007; 65 782 791
20. Fischbacher C., Chappel D., Edwards R. et al. Health surveys via the Internet: quick and dirty or rapid and robust? J R Soc Med: 2000; 93 356 359
21. Core figures. Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek (Statistics Netherlands): 2012; www.cbs.nl
22. Van der Krieke L., Emerencia A. C., Aiello M. et al. Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis. J Med Internet Res: 2012; 14 e24
23. Braithwaite D., Emery J., de Lusignan S. et al. Using the internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam Pract: 2003; 20 545 551
24. Klovning A., Sandvik H., Hunskaar S. Web-based survey attracted age-biased sample with more severe illness than paper-based survey. J Clin Epidemiol: 2009; 62 1068 1074