Measuring patients' views: A bifactor model of distinct patient-reported outcomes in psychosis

Psychological Medicine

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 277-289

  Reininghaus, U ^a,d   McCabe, R ^a   Burns, T ^b   Croudace, T ^c   Priebe, S ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b WARNEFORD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWHAM CENTRE FOR MENTAL HEALTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bifactor model; evaluation; patient reported outcomes; psychosis; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCHIZOPHRENIA; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; ENGLAND; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHIZOPHRENIA;

EID: 79952815852     PISSN: 00332917     EISSN: 14698978     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0033291710000784     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Altman D, Schulz K, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche P, Lang T (2001). The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine 134, 663-694. (Pubitemid 32322245)
2. Bentler P (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238-246.
3. Bjorner J, Chang C, Thissen D, Reeve B (2007). Developing tailored instruments: item banking and computerized adaptive assessment. Quality of Life Research 16, 95-108. (Pubitemid 47036912)
4. Browne M, Cudeck R (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models (ed. K. Bollen and J. Long), pp. 136-162. Sage: Beverly Hills, CA.
5. Burns T, Creed F, Fahy T, Thompson S, Tyrer P, White I (1999). Intensive versus standard case management for severe psychotic illness: a randomised trial. UK700 Group. Lancet 353, 2185-2189. (Pubitemid 29295250)
6. Campbell D, Fiske D (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin 56, 81-105.
7. Crow R, Gage H, Hampson S, Hart J, Kimber A, Storey L, Thomas H (2002). The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature. Health Technology Assessment 6, 1-244.
8. Cudeck R, Browne R (1983). Cross-validation of covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 18, 147-167.
9. DoH (2008). High Quality Care For All. NHS Next Stage Review Final Report. Department of Health: London.
10. DoH (2009). Guidance on the Routine Collection of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Department of Health: London.
11. Elwyn G, Buetow S, Hibbard J, Wensing M (2007). Respecting the subjective: quality measurement from the patient's perspective. British Medical Journal 335, 1021-1022. (Pubitemid 350157259)
12. Embretson S, Reise S (2000). Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.: Mahwah, NJ.
13. EMEA (2005). Reflection Paper on the Regulatory Guidance for the Use of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Measures in the Evaluation of Medicinal Products. European Medicines Agency: London.
14. Fakhoury W, Kaiser W, Roeder-Wanner U, Priebe S (2002). Subjective evaluation: is there more than one criterion ? Schizophrenia Bulletin 28, 319-327. (Pubitemid 35462247)
15. FDA (2006). Guidance for Industry. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. US Food and Drug Administration: Rockville, MD.
16. Flora D, Curran P (2004). An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods 9, 466-491. (Pubitemid 40005044)
17. Floyd F, Widaman K (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment 7, 286-299.
18. Fries J, Bruce B, Cella D (2005). The promise of PROMIS: using item response theory to improve assessment of patient-reported outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 23, S53-S57. (Pubitemid 46657511)
19. Gaite L, Vazquez-Barquero J, Arrizabalaga A, Schene A, Welcher B, Thornicroft G, Ruggeri M, Vazquez-Bourgon E, Retuerto M, Leese M (2000). Quality of life in schizophrenia: development, reliability and internal consistency of the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile - European Version. British Journal of Psychiatry. Supplement 177, S49-S54. (Pubitemid 30447747)
20. Gibbons R, Bock D, Hedeker D, Weiss D, Segawa E, Bhaumik D, Kupfer D, Frank E, Grochocinski V, Stover A (2007). Full-information bifactor analysis for graded response data. Applied Psychological Measurement 31, 4-19. (Pubitemid 44832899)
21. Gibbons R, Hedeker D (1992). Full-information item bi-factor analysis. Psychometrika 57, 423-436.
22. Gibbons R, Weiss D, Kupfer D, Frank E, Fagiolini A, Grochocinski V, Bhaumik D, Stover A, Bock R, Immekus J (2008). Using computerized adaptive testing to reduce the burden of mental health assessment. Psychiatric Services 59, 361-368.
23. Gilbody S, House A, Sheldon T (2002). Routine administration of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and needs assessment instruments to improve psychological outcome - a systematic review. Psychological Medicine 32, 1345-1356. (Pubitemid 35385646)
24. Hansson L, Bjorkman T, Priebe S (2007). Are important patient-rated outcomes in community mental health care explained by only one factor? Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 116, 113-118. (Pubitemid 47076270)
25. James L, Mulai S, Brett J (1982). Causal Analysis: Assumptions, Models and Data. Sage Publications: Beverly Hills, CA.
26. Kilian R, Angermeyer M (1999). Quality of life in psychiatry as an ethical duty: from the clinical to the societal perspective. Psychopathology 32, 127-134. (Pubitemid 29176613)
27. Leese M, Schene A, Koeter M, Meijer K, Bindman J, Mazzi M, Puschner B, Burti L, Becker T, Moreno M, Celani D, White I, Thornicroft G (2008). SF-36 scales, and simple sums of scales, were reliable quality-of-life summaries for patients with schizophrenia. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61, 588-596.
28. Lehman A (1996). Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 31, 78-88. (Pubitemid 26075308)
29. McCabe R, Saidi M, Priebe S (2007). Patient-reported outcomes in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry. Supplement 191, S21-S28. (Pubitemid 47204551)
30. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG (2001). The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 357, 1191-1194. (Pubitemid 32378696)
31. Mokkink L, Terwee C, Knol D, Stratford P, Alonso J, Patrick D, Bouter L, de Vet H (2006). Protocol of the COSMIN study: COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments. BMC Medical Research Methodology 6, 2.
32. Muthén B (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika 54, 557-585.
33. Muthén L, Muthén B (1998-2009). Mplus Version 5.2. Muthén & Muthén: Los Angeles, CA.
34. Nguyen T, Attkisson C, Stegner B (1983). Assessment of patient satisfaction: development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning 6, 299-313.
35. Oliver J, Huxley P, Priebe S, Kaiser W (1997). Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 32, 76-83. (Pubitemid 27075694)
36. Phelan M, Slade S, Thornicroft G, Dunn G, Holloway F, Wykes T, Strathdee G, Loftus L, McCrone P, Hayward P (1995). The Camberwell Assessment of Need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 167, 589-595. (Pubitemid 26197767)
37. Priebe S (2007). Social outcomes in schizophrenia. British Journal of Psychiatry. Supplement 191, S15-S20. (Pubitemid 47204550)
38. Priebe S, Gruyters T (1993). The role of the helping alliance in psychiatric community care. A prospective study. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 181, 552-557. (Pubitemid 24259639)
39. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S (1999). Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). International Journal of Social Psychiatry 45, 7-12. (Pubitemid 29158596)
40. Priebe S, Kaiser W, Huxley P, Roder-Wanner U, Rudolf H (1998). Do different subjective evaluation criteria reflect distinct constructs? Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 186, 385-392. (Pubitemid 28363353)
41. Priebe S, McCabe R, Bullenkamp J, Hansson L, Lauber C, Martinez-Leal R, Rossler W, Salize H, Svensson B, Torres-Gonzales F, van den Brink R, Wiersma D, Wright DJ (2007). Structured patient-clinician communication and 1-year outcome in community mental healthcare: cluster randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 191, 420-426. (Pubitemid 350069583)
42. Reise S, Morizot J, Hays R (2007). The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures. Quality of Life Research 16, 19-31. (Pubitemid 47036916)
43. Rodebaugh T, Woods C, Thissen D, Heimberg R, Chambless D, Rapee R (2004). More information from fewer questions: the factor structure and item properties of the original and brief fear of negative evaluation scale. Psychological Assessment 16, 169-181. (Pubitemid 38802758)
44. Salvi G, Leese M, Slade M (2005). Routine use of mental health outcome assessments: choosing the measure. British Journal of Psychiatry 186, 146-152. (Pubitemid 40193785)
45. Speechley M, Forchuk C, Hoch J, Jensen E, Wagg J (2009). Deriving a mental health outcome measure using the pooled index: an application to psychiatric consumer-survivors in different housing types. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology 9, 133-143.
46. Steiger J (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: an interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research 25, 173-180.
47. Tsutakawa R, Johnson J (1990). The effect of uncertainty of item parameter estimation on ability estimates. Psychometrika 55, 371-390.
48. Tucker L, Lewis C (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika 38, 1-10.
49. Tyrer P, Remington M (1979). Controlled comparison of day-hospital and outpatient treatment for neurotic disorders. Lancet 313, 1014-1016. (Pubitemid 9183432)
50. Uher R, Farmer A, Maier W, Rietschel M, Hauser J, Marusic A, Mors O, Elkin A, Williamson R, Schmael C, Henigsberg N, Perez J, Mendlewicz J, Janzing J, Zobel A, Skibinska M, Kozel D, Stamp A, Bajs M, Placentino A, Barreto M, McGuffin P, Aitchison K (2008). Measuring depression: comparison and integration of three scales in the GENDEP study. Psychological Medicine 38, 289-300. (Pubitemid 351156595)
51. Williams B (1994). Patient satisfaction: a valid concept. Social Sciences and Medicine 38, 509-516.
52. Yang F, Tommet D, Jones R (2009). Disparities in self-reported geriatric depressive symptoms due to socio-demographic differences: an extension of the bi-factor item response theory model for use in differential item functioning. Journal of Psychiatric Research 43, 1025-1035.