Usability evaluation of a web-based support system for people with a schizophrenia diagnosis

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2012, Pages

  Van Der Krieke, Lian ^a   Emerencia, Ando C ^b   Aiello, Marco ^b   Sytema, Sjoerd ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Recommendation systems; Schizophrenia; Self management; Usability testing; Web based systems

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

ADULT; COMPUTER LITERACY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SOCIAL SUPPORT;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 84860571687     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1921     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Trauer T. Introduction. In: Trauer T, editor. Outcome measurement in mental health: theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010:1-14.
2. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
3. Opler LA, Ramirez PM, Mougios VM. Outcome measurement in serious mental illness. In: Ishak WW, Burt T, Sederer LI, editors. Outcome measurement in psychiatry: a critical review. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Pub.; 2002:139-154.
4. Lambert MJ, Hansen NB, Finch AE. Patient-focused research: using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects. J Consult Clin Psychol 2001 Apr;69(2):159-172. [Medline: 11393594]
5. Lambert MJ, Harmon C, Slade K, Whipple JL, Hawkins EJ. Providing feedback to psychotherapists on their patients' progress: clinical results and practice suggestions. J Clin Psychol 2005 Feb;61(2):165-174. [doi: 10.1002/jclp.20113] [Medline: 15609358]
6. Whipple JL, Lambert MJ. Outcome measures for practice. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2011 Apr;7:87-111. [doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-040510-143938] [Medline: 21166536]
7. Lakeman R. Standardized routine outcome measurement: pot holes in the road to recovery. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2004 Dec;13(4):210-215. [doi: 10.1111/j.1445-8330.2004.00336.x] [Medline: 15660588]
8. Guthrie D, McIntosh M, Callaly T, Trauer T, Coombs T. Consumer attitudes towards the use of routine outcome measures in a public mental health service: a consumer-driven study. Int J Ment Health Nurs 2008 Apr;17(2):92-97. [doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0349.2008.00516.x] [Medline: 18307597]
9. Happell B. Meaningful information or a bureaucratic exercise? Exploring the value of routine outcome measurement in mental health. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2008 Oct;29(10):1098-1114. [doi: 10.1080/01612840802319852] [Medline: 18853349]
10. GGZ Nederland. Naar herstel en gelijkwaardig burgerschap. Visie op de (langdurende) zorg aan mensen met ernstige psychische aandoeningen. URL: http://www.ggznederland.nl/scrivo/asset.php?id=305955 [accessed 2011-12-09] [WebCite Cache ID 63ndB6FmG]
11. Deegan PE. Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disabilities. Soc Work Health Care 1997;25(3):11-24. [doi: 10.1300/J010v25n03_02] [Medline: 9358596]
12. Mahone IH, Farrell S, Hinton I, Johnson R, Moody D, Rifkin K, Region Ten CSB/UVA School of Nursing Partnership. Shared decision making in mental health treatment: qualitative findings from stakeholder focus groups. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2011 Dec;25(6):e27-e36. [doi: 10.1016/j.apnu.2011.04.003] [Medline: 22114804]
13. Frank AF, Gunderson JG. The role of the therapeutic alliance in the treatment of schizophrenia. Relationship to course and outcome. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1990 Mar;47(3):228-236. [Medline: 1968329]
14. PHAMOUS. Pharmacotherapy monitoring and outcome surveyURL: http://www.phamous.eu/home.html [accessed 2011-12-08] [WebCite Cache ID 63mSD7VGc]
15. Makkink S, Kits L. Herstellen doe je zelf. In: Van Hees S, Van der Vlist P, Mulder N, editors. ROM. Van weten naar meten, ROM in de GGZ. Amsterdam: Boom; 2011:97-108.
16. Schaefer B, Nijssen Y, Van Weeghel J. Van meten naar oplossingsgericht werken. In: Van Hees S, Van der Vlist P, Mulder N, editors. ROM. Van weten naar meten, ROM in de GGZ. Amsterdam: Boom; 2011:89-96.
17. Schrank B, Sibitz I, Unger A, Amering M. How patients with schizophrenia use the internet: qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2010 Dec;12(5):e70 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1550] [Medline: 21169176]
18. Kuosmanen L, Jakobsson T, Hyttinen J, Koivunen M, Välimäki M. Usability evaluation of a web-based patient information system for individuals with severe mental health problems. J Adv Nurs 2010 Dec;66(12):2701-2710. [doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05411.x] [Medline: 20722811]
19. Jones RB, Atkinson JM, Coia DA, Paterson L, Morton AR, McKenna K, et al. Randomised trial of personalised computer based information for patients with schizophrenia. BMJ 2001 Apr 7;322(7290):835-840. [Medline: 11290639]
20. Rotondi AJ, Anderson CM, Haas GL, Eack SM, Spring MB, Ganguli R, et al. Web-based psychoeducational intervention for persons with schizophrenia and their supporters: one-year outcomes. Psychiatr Serv 2010 Nov;61(11):1099-1105. [doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.61.11.1099] [Medline: 21041348]
21. Bickmore TW, Puskar K, Schlenk EA, Pfeifer LM, Sereika SM. Maintaining reality: relational agents for antipsychotic medication adherence. Interacting with Computers 2010;22(4):276-288. [doi: 10.1016/j.intcom.2010.02.001]
22. Wing JK, Beevor AS, Curtis RH, Park SB, Hadden S, Burns A. Health of the Nation Outcome Scales (HoNOS). Research and development. Br J Psychiatry 1998 Jan;172:11-18. [Medline: 9534825]
23. Priebe S, Huxley P, Knight S, Evans S. Application and results of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999;45(1):7-12. [Medline: 10443245]
24. Emerencia AC, Krieke van der L, Petkov N, Aiello M. Assessing schizophrenia with an interoperable architecture. 2011 Oct 28 Presented at: Assessing schizophrenia with an interoperable architecture. 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management MIXHS'11; 2011 Oct 28; Glasgow, Scotland, UK. p.82. In press.
25. van der Krieke L, Emerencia AC, Sytema S. An online portal on outcomes for Dutch service users. Psychiatr Serv 2011 Jul;62(7):803. [doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.62.7.803] [Medline: 21724797]
26. Rotondi AJ, Sinkule J, Haas GL, Spring MB, Litsche CM, Newhill CE, et al. Designing websites for persons with cognitive deficits: design and usability of a psychoeducational intervention for persons with severe mental illness. Psychological Services 2007;4(3):202. [doi: 10.1037/1541-1559.4.3.202]
27. Cooper A, Reimann R. Implementation models and mental models. In: Cooper A, Reimann R, editors. About Face 2.0: the essentials of user interface design. Indianapolis: Wiley Publishing; 2003:21-32.
28. Valimaki M, Anttila M, Hatonen H, Koivunen M, Jakobsson T, Pitkanen A, et al. Design and development process of patient-centered computer-based support system for patients with schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. Inform Health Soc Care 2008 Jun;33(2):113-123. [doi: 10.1080/17538150802127207] [Medline: 18604755]
29. Stephanidis C. editor. User interfaces for all. Concepts, methods, and tools. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2001.
30. Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Participant recruitment. In: Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A, editors. Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2011:81-107.
31. Nielsen J. What is usability? In: Usability engineering. San Francisco, Calif.: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers; 1993:23-48.
32. Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. In: Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 Conference on human factors in computing systems. 1993 Presented at: INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference; 24-29 April 1993; Amsterdam, The Netherlands;. [doi: 10.1145/169059.169166]
33. Nielsen J. Heuristic evaluation. In: Nielsen J, Mack RL, editors. Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley; 1994:25.
34. Hennink M, Hutter I, Bailey A. Observation. In: Qualitative Research Methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd; 2011:169-200.
35. Van De Belt TH, Engelen LJ, Berben SA, Schoonhoven L. Definition of Health 2.0 and Medicine 2.0: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010;12(2):e18 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1350] [Medline: 20542857]
36. Internet World Stats. Top 58 countries with highest penetration ratesURL: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats9.htm [accessed 2011-10-20] [WebCite Cache ID 62ZgZpqAm]