Influence of dental materials on dental MRI

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2013, Pages

  Tymofiyeva, O ^a   Vaegler, S ^a   Rottner, K ^b   Boldt, J ^b   Hopfgartner, A J ^a   Proff, P C ^c   Richter, E J ^b   Jakob, P M ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WÜRZBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^d Research Center for Magnetic Resonance Bavaria eV   (Germany)

Author keywords

Dental materials; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; AMALGAM; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; DENTAL MATERIAL; EPOXY RESIN; EPOXY RESIN BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER; EPOXY RESIN-BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER; GLASS IONOMER; GOLD ALLOY; GUTTA PERCHA; NICKEL; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; TITANIUM ALLOY (TIAL6V4); TITANIUM NICKELIDE; ZIRCONIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHEMISTRY; HUMAN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETISM; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; ORTHODONTIC BRACKET; ORTHODONTIC WIRE; TOOTH CROWN;

ARTIFACTS; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; EPOXY RESINS; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; GOLD ALLOYS; GUTTA-PERCHA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; NICKEL; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIALS; STAINLESS STEEL; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 84878049827     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120271     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Kress B, Buhl Y, Anders L, Stippich C, Palm F, Bahren W, et al. Quantitative analysis of MRI signal intensity as a tool for evaluating tooth pulp vitality. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 241-244.
2. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Gareis D, Boldt J, Schmid F, Lopez MA, et al. In vivo MRI-based dental impression using an intraoral RF receiver coil. Concept Magn Reson B: Magn Reson Eng 2008; 33B: 244-251.
3. Tymofiyeva O, Schmid F, von Kienlin M, Breuer FA, Rottner K, Boldt J, et al. On precise localization of boundaries between extended uniform objects in MRI: tooth imaging as an example. Magn Reson Mater Phys 2011; 24: 19-28.
4. Tymofiyeva O, Rottner K, Jakob PM, Richter E, Proff P. Threedimensional localization of impacted teeth using magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 14: 169-176.
5. Tymofiyeva O, Boldt J, Rottner K, Schmid F, Richter E-J, Jakob PM. High-resolution 3D magnetic resonance imaging and quantification of carious lesions and dental pulp in vivo. MAGMA 2009; 22: 365-374.
6. Idiyatullin D, Corum C, Moeller S, Prasad HS, Garwood M, Nixdorf DR. Dental magnetic resonance imaging: making the invisible visible. J Endod 2011; 37: 745-752.
7. Bracher A-K, Hofmann C, Bornstedt A, Boujraf S, Hell E, Ulrici J, et al. Feasibility of ultra-short echo time (UTE) magnetic resonance imaging for identification of carious lesions. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 538-545.
8. Abbaszadeh K, Heffez LB, Mafee MF. Effect of interference of metallic objects on interpretation of T1-weighted magnetic resonance images in the maxillofacial region. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 759-765.
9. Beuf O, Lissac M, Cr'emillieux Y, Briguet A. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging disturbances and the magnetic susceptibility of dental materials. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 265-268.
10. Costa AL, Appenzeller S, Yasuda CL, Pereira FR, Zanardi VA, Cendes F. Artifacts in brain magnetic resonance imaging due to metallic dental objects. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2009; 14: E278-E282.
11. Destine D, Mizutani H, Igarashi Y. Metallic artifacts in MRI caused by dental alloys and magnetic keeper. J Jpn Prosthodont Soc 2008; 52: 205-210.
12. Eggers G, Rieker M, Kress B, Fiebach J, Dickhaus H, Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. MAGMA 2005; 18: 103-111. (Pubitemid 40767701)
13. Lissac M, Metrop D, Brugirard J, Coudert JL, Pimmel P, Briguet A, et al. Dental materials and magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 1991; 26: 40-45.
14. Masumi S, Arita M, Morikawa M, Toyoda S. Effect of dental metals on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 97-106.
15. Shafiei F, Honda E, Takahashi H, Sasaki T. Artifacts from dental casting alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. J Dent Res 2003; 82: 602-606. (Pubitemid 41766141)
16. Starcuk Z, Bartusek K, Hub'alkov'a H, Bachorec T, Starcukov'a J, Krupa P. Evaluation of MRI artifacts caused by metallic dental implants and classification of the dental materials in use. Meas Sci Rev 2006; 6: 24-27.
17. Starcukov'a J, Starcuk Z Jr, Hub'alkov'a H, Linetskiy I. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts. Dent Mater 2008; 24: 715-723. (Pubitemid 351626152)
18. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23: 815-850. (Pubitemid 26192503)
19. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5: 75-88.
20. Graf H, Steidle G, Martirosian P, Lauer UA, Schick F. Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching. Magn Reson Med 2005; 54: 231-234. (Pubitemid 40898420)
21. Koivula A. Magnetic resonance image distortions due to artificial macroscopic objects. An example: correction of image distortion caused by an artificial hip prosthesis. Dissertation. Oulu, Finland: University of Oulu; 2002.
22. Koch KM, Lorbiecki JE, Hinks RS, King KF. A multispectral three-dimensional acquisition technique for imaging near metal implants. Magn Reson Med 2009; 61: 381-390.
23. Lu W, Pauly KB, Gold GE, Pauly JM, Hargreaves BA. SEMAC: slice encoding for metal artifact correction in MRI. Magn Reson Med 2009; 62: 66-76.
24. Schenck JF. Quantitative analysis of intensity artifacts in spinecho images produced by variations in magnetic susceptibility within the field of view: equations for the rapid determination of susceptibilities and analogies with catastrophe optics and optical caustic curves. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (SMRM); 14-20 August, 1993; Berkeley, CA. Berkeley, CA: SMRM; 1993.
25. Lüdeke KM, Röschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3: 329-343. (Pubitemid 16176583)
26. Ferracane JL. Materials in dentistry: principles and applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001.
27. Doty FD, Entzminger G, Yang YA. Magnetism in high-resolution NMR probe design. I. General methods. Concepts Magn Reson A 1998; 10: 133-156.
28. Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B, Adam G, Kemper J. Magnetic forces on orthodontic wires in high field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 Tesla. J Orofac Orthop 2006; 67: 424-429. (Pubitemid 44823836)
29. Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE, Vinitski S, Friedman DP. Metallic artifacts on MR images of the postoperative spine: reduction with fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology 1994; 190: 565-569. (Pubitemid 24044271)
30. Petersilge CA, Lewin JS, Duerk JL, Yoo JU, Ghaneyem AJ. Optimizing imaging parameters for MR evaluation of the spine with titanium pedicle screws. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 166: 1213-1218. (Pubitemid 26122975)