Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts

Dental Materials

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 715-723

  Starčuková, Jana ^a   Starčuk Jr , Zenon ^a   Hubálková, Hana ^b   Linetskiy, Igor ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS   (Czech Republic)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Amalgams; Dental alloys; Electric conductivity; Image artifact; Magnetic susceptibility; Metallic dental materials; MR imaging

Indexed keywords

DENTAL AMALGAMS; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MEDICAL IMAGING;

DENTAL DEVICES; IMAGE ARTIFACTS; METALLIC DENTAL MATERIALS; OROFACIAL IMAGING;

DENTAL ALLOYS;

ALUMINUM DERIVATIVE; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; COPPER; COPPER NICKEL ALLOY; DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; NICKEL; TITANIUM;

ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; BRAIN; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FACE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INSTRUMENTATION; MAGNETISM; MATERIALS TESTING; METHODOLOGY; MOUTH; NECK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COPPER; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; ELECTRIC CONDUCTIVITY; FACE; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETICS; MATERIALS TESTING; MOUTH; NECK; NICKEL; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; TITANIUM; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 43049100040     PISSN: 01095641     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.07.002     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Schenck J.F. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23 (1996) 815-850
2. Ludeke K.M., Aoschmann P., and Tischler A. Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imag 3 (1985) 329-343
3. Bartels L.W., Smits H.F.M., Bakker C.J.G., and Viergever M.A. MR Imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12 (2001) 365-371
4. Camacho C.R., Plewes D.B., and Henkelman R.M. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 5 (1995) 75-88
5. Graf H., Steidle G., Martirosian P., Lauer U.A., and Schick F. Metal artifacts caused by gradient switching. Magn Reson Med 54 1 (2005) 231-234
6. Beuf O., Lissac M., Cremillieux Y., and Briguet A. Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging disturbances and the magnetic susceptibility of dental materials. Dent Mater 10 (1994) 265-268
7. Lissac M., Coudert J.L., Briguet A., and Amiel M. Disturbances caused by dental materials in magnetic resonance imaging. Int Dent J 42 4 (1992) 229-233
8. Starčuk Z., Bartušek K., Hubálková H., Bachorec T., Starčuková J., and Krupa P. Evaluation of MRI artifacts caused by metallic dental implants and classification of the dental materials in use. Meas Sci Rev 6 2 (2006) 24-27
9. Eggers G., Rieker M., Kress B., Fiebach J., Dickhaus H., and Hassfeld S. Artefacts in magnetic resonance imaging caused by dental material. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 18 (2005) 103-111
10. Vikhoff B., Ribbelin S., Kohler B., Ekholm S., and Borrman H. Artefacts caused by dental filling materials in MR imaging. Acta Radiol 36 3 (1995) 323-325
11. Starcuk Z., Hubalkova H., Krupa P., Bartusek K., Starcukova J., and Linetskiy I. Assessment of MR compatibility of selected dental alloys. Proc Int Soc Mag Reson Med 13 (2005) 2276
12. Marques J.P., and Bowtell R. Numerical simulations of the DQC signal in inhomogeneous solutions. Proc Int Magn Reson Med 11 (2003) 1020
13. Balac S, Caloz G. Mathematical modeling and numerical simulation of magnetic susceptibility artifacts in Magn Reson Imag 2000; http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/balac00mathematical.html.
14. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). F2119-01: standard test method for evaluation of MR image artifacts from passive implants (2001), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
15. Weglarz W.P., Tanasiewicz M., Kupka T., Skorka T., Sulek Z., and Jasinski A. 3D MR imaging of dental cavities-an in vitro study. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 25 (2004) 84-87
16. Olt S., and Jakob P.M. Contrast-enhanced dental MRI for visualization of the teeth and jaw. Magn Reson Med 52 (2004) 174-176
17. Beuf O., Seurin M.J., Briguet A., and Lissac M. Magnetic resonance imaging of rodent teeth. Magn Reson Mater Phys Biol Med 8 (1999) 83-86
18. Davis P.L., Crooks L., Arakawa M., McRee R., Kaufman L., and Margulls A.R. Potential hazards in NMR imaging: heating effects of changing magnetic fields and RF fields on small metallic implants. AJR 137 (1981) 857-860
19. Port J.P., and Pomper M.G. Quantification and minimization of magnetic susceptibility artifacts on GRE images. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24 (2000) 958-964
20. Hopper T.A.J., Vasilic B., Pope J.M., Jones C.E., Epstein C.L., Song H.K., and Wehrli F.W. Experimental and computational analyses of the effects of slice distortion from a metallic sphere in an MRI phantom. Magn Reson Imag 24 (2006) 1077-1085
21. New P.F.J., Rosen B.R., Brady T.J., et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 147 (1983) 139-148
22. Shellock F.G., Monisoli S., and Kanal E. MR procedures and biomedical implants, materials, and devices: 1993 update. Radiology 189 (1993) 587-599