Housebuilder Networks and Residential Land Markets

Urban Studies

Volumn 49, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 705-720

  Adams, David ^a   Leishman, Chris ^a   Watkins, Craig ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIALIZATION; HOUSING FINANCE; HOUSING MARKET; LAND EVALUATION; RESIDENTIAL LOCATION; SOCIAL HOUSING; URBAN AREA; VOLUNTARY APPROACH;

UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84857588318     PISSN: 00420980     EISSN: 1360063X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0042098011405687     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anderson C., and Shirako A. The origins of reputation: behavior, visibility, and personality. Berkeley, CA: University of California; 2007:.
2. Ball M. Housing Policy and Economic Power. London: Methuen; 1983:.
3. Ball M. Institutions in British property research. Urban Studies. 1998;35:1501-1517.
4. Ball M. Firm size and competition: a comparison of the housebuilding industries in Australia, the United Kingdom and the USA. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors; 2008:.
5. Barker K. Review of housing supply: delivering stability: steering our future housing needs-final report: recommendations. London: Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; 2004:.
6. van Bortela G., and Elsingaa M. A network perspective on the organization of social housing in the Netherlands: the case of urban renewal in The Hague. Housing Theory and Society. 2007;24:32-48.
7. Bradach J. L., and Eccles R. G. Price, authority and trust: from ideal types to plural forms. Annual Review of Sociology. 1989;15:97-118.
8. Brien A. Professional ethics and the culture of trust. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17:391-409.
9. Buzzelli M., and Harris R. Cities as the industrial districts of housebuilding. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2006;30:894-917.
10. Cabral L. M. B. The Economics of Trust and Reputation: A Primer. New York: New York State University Press; 2005:.
11. Calcutt J. The Calcutt review of housebuilding delivery. London: Department for Communities and Local Government; 2007:.
12. Castells M.(2000) The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell. Oxford: Blackwell; 2000:.
13. Doak J., and Karadimitriou N.(Re)development complexity and networks: a framework for research. Urban Studies. 2007;44 (2): 209-229.
14. Eccles R. G. The quasifirm in the construction industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1981;2:335-357.
15. Frances J., Levačić R., Mitchell J., and Thompson G. Introduction. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks. Thompson G. Frances J. Levačić R. and Mitchell J., ed. London: Sage; 1991:1-23.
16. Gabriel M., and Jacobs K. The post-social turn: challenges for housing research. Housing Studies. 2008;23:527-540.
17. Gordon I., and McCann P. Industrial cluster, complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks.Urban Studies. 2000;37:513-532.
18. Gössling T. Proximity, trust and morality in networks. European Planning Studies. 2004;12 (5): 675-689.
19. Granovetter M. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology. 1973;78 (6): 201-233.
20. Granovetter M. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology. 1985;91 (3): 481-510.
21. Granovetter M. Economic institutions as social constructions: a framework for analysis. Acta Sociologica. 1992;35:3-11.
22. Hardin R. Trust. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2006:.
23. Healey P. An institutional model of the development process. Journal of Property Research. 1992;9:33-44.
24. Höppner C. Trust: a monolithic panacea in land use planning?. Land Use Policy. 2009;26:1046-1054.
25. Larson A. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: a study of the governance of exchange relationship. Administrative Science Quarterly. 1992;37:76-104.
26. Macaulay S. Non-contractual relations in business: a preliminary study. American Sociological Review. 1963;28:55-67.
27. Needham B., and de Kam G. Understanding how land is exchanged: co-ordination mechanisms and transaction costs. Urban Studies. 2004;41:2061-2076.
28. Needham B., Segeren A., and Buitelaar E. Institutions in theories of land markets: illustrated by the Dutch market for agricultural land. Urban Studies. 2011;48 (1): 161-176.
29. Nicol C., and Hooper A. Contemporary change and the housebuilding industry: concentration and standardisation in production. Housing Studies. 1999;14:57-76.
30. Office of Fair Trading. Homebuilding in the UK: a market study. London: OFT; 2008:.
31. O'Neill P., and Whatmore S. The business of place: networks of property, partnership and produce. Geoforum. 2000;31:121-136.
32. Powell W. W. Neither market nor hierarchy: network forms of organisation. Markets, Hierarchies and Networks. Thompson G. Frances J. Levačić R. and Mitchell J., ed. London: Sage; 1990:265-276.
33. Putnam R. D. Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1993:.
34. Sexton M., Barrett P., and Aouad G. Motivating small construction companies to adopt new technology. Building Research and Information. 2006;34:11-22.
35. Shelanski H. A., and Klein P. G. Empirical research in transaction cost economics: a review and assessment. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization. 1995;7:335-361.
36. Swain C., and Tait M. The crisis of trust and planning. Planning Theory and Practice. 2007;8:229-247.
37. Tait M. Building trust in planning: understanding the contested legitimacy of a planning decision. Paper presented at the Association of Collegiate Schools of Planning Conference; 2009Crystal City, VA; 2009.
38. Vogel B. Linking for change: network action as collective, focussed and energetic behaviour. Long Range Planning. 2005;38:531-533.
39. Wellings F. Private housebuilding annual 2001. London: Credit Lyonnais Securities Europe; 2001:.
40. Wellings F. Private housebuilding annual 2005. London: Fred Wellings; 2006:.
41. Williamson O. E. The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. American Journal of Sociology. 1981;87:548-577.