Validation and reliability of the young schema questionnaire in a flemish inpatient eating disorder and alcohol and substance use disorder sample

Cognitive Therapy and Research

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 647-656

  Pauwels, Els ^a,b   Claes, Laurence ^a   Smits, Dirk ^a,c   Dierckx, Eva ^b,d   Muehlenkamp, Jennifer J ^e   Peuskens, Hendrik ^b   Vandereycken, Walter ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b Alexian Brothers Psychiatric Hospital   (Belgium)

^c University College Brussels   (Belgium)

^d VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN EAU CLAIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

Addiction; Eating disorder; Personality traits; Validity; Young Schema Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ABUSE; ADULT; AGE; AGED; ALCOHOL USE DISORDER; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONVERGENT VALIDITY; DEPENDENT PERSONALITY DISORDER; EATING DISORDER; EMOTIONAL DEPRIVATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PSYCHOMETRY; SELF CONTROL; SEX DIFFERENCE; SHAME; SOCIAL ISOLATION; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; YOUNG SCHEMA QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 84878017677     PISSN: 01475916     EISSN: 15732819     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10608-012-9501-4     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ball, S. A.; & Cecero, J. J. (2001). Addicted patients with personality disorders: Traits, schemas, and presenting problems. Journal of Personality Disorders, 15, 72-83.
2. Ball, S. A.; & Young, J. E. (2000). Dual focus schema therapy for personality disorders and substance dependence: Case study results. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 7, 270-281.
3. Bandalos, D. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102.
4. Bandalos, D. L. (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211-240. doi: 10.1080/10705510801922340.
5. Baranoff, J.; Oei, T. P. S.; Kwon, S. M.; & Cho, S. (2006). Factor structure and internal consistency of the young schema questionnaire (short form). Journal of Affective Disorders, 93, 133-140.
6. Brotchie, J.; Meyer, C.; Copello, A.; Kidney, R.; & Waller, G. (2004). Cognitive representations in alcohol and opiate abuse: The role of core beliefs. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 337-342.
7. Calvete, E.; Estevez, A.; Lopez de Arroyabe, E.; & Ruiz, P. (2005). The Schema Questionnaire-short form: Structure and relationship with automatic thoughts and symptoms of affective disorders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21, 90-99.
8. Cooper, S. E. (1989). Chemical dependency and eating disorders: Are they really so different? Journal of Counseling and Development, 68, 102-105.
9. Costa, P. J.; Terracciano, A.; & Mc Crae, R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331.
10. Harrop, E. N.; & Marlatt, G. A. (2010). The comorbidity of substance use disorders and eating disorders in women: Prevalence, etiology, and treatment. Addiction Behaviors, 35, 392-398.
11. Hoffart, A.; Sexton, H.; Hedley, L. M.; Wang, C. E.; Holthe, H.; Haugum, J. A.; et al. (2005). The structure of maladaptive schemas: A confirmatory factor analysis and a psychometric evaluation of factor-derived scales. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 29, 627-644.
12. Hu, L.; & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424.
13. Hu, L.; & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118.
14. Jöreskog, K.; & Sörbom, D. (2004). LISRELL 8.71 [computer program]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
15. Lee, C. W.; Taylor, G.; & Dunn, J. (1999). Factor structure of the Schema Questionnaire in a large clinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 23, 441-451.
16. Nordahl, H. M.; Holthe, H.; & Haugum, J. A. (2005). Early maladaptive schemas in patients with or without personality disorders: Does schema modification predict symptomatic relief? Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 12, 142-149.
17. Nunnally, J. C.; & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
18. Ohanian, V. (2002). Imagery rescripting within cognitive behavior therapy for bulimia nervosa: An illustrative case report. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 31, 352-357.
19. Petrocelli, J. V.; Glaser, B. A.; Calhoun, G. B.; & Campbell, L. F. (2001). Cognitive schemas as mediating variables of the relationship between the self-defeating personality and depression. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 23, 183-191.
20. Reeves, M.; & Taylor, J. (2007). Specific relationships between core beliefs and personality disorder symptoms in a non-clinical sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 14, 96-104.
21. Rijkeboer, M. M.; & van den Bergh, H. (2006). Multiple group factor analysis of the Young Schema Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population. Cognitive Therapy Research, 30, 263-278.
22. Rijkeboer, M. M.; van den Bergh, H.; & van den Bout, J. (2005). Stability and discriminative power of the Young Schema Questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 36, 129-144.
23. Saariaho, T.; Saariaho, A.; Karila, I.; & Joukamaa, M. (2009). The psychometric properties of the Finnish Young Schema Questionnaire in chronic pain patients and a non-clinical sample. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 40, 158-168.
24. Schermelleh-Engel, K.; Moosbrugger, H.; & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8, 23-74.
25. Schmidt, N. B.; Joiner, T. E.; Young, J. E.; & Telch, M. J. (1995). The Schema Questionnaire: Investigation of psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 19, 295-321.
26. Schotte, C. K. W.; De Doncker, D.; Vankerckhoven, C.; Vertommen, H.; & Cosyns, P. (1998). Self-report assessment of the DSM-IV personality disorders. Measurement of trait and distress characteristics: The ADP-IV. Psychological Medicine, 28, 1179-1188.
27. Stopa, L.; Thorne, P.; Waters, A.; & Preston, J. (2001). Are the short and long forms of the Young Schema Questionnaire comparable and how well does each version predict psychopathology scores? Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 15, 253-272.
28. Thimm, J. (2011). Incremental validity of maladaptive schemas over five-factor model facets in the prediction of personality disorder symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 777-782.
29. Waller, G.; Kennerly, H.; & Ohanian, V. (2007). Schema-focused cognitive behavioral therapy for eating disorders. In L. P. Riso, P. L. du Toit, D. J. Steia, & J. E. Young (Eds.), Cognitive schemas and core beliefs in psychological problems: A scientist-practitioner guide (pp. 139-175). New York: American Psychological Association.
30. Waller, G.; Meyer, C.; & Ohanian, V. (2001a). Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young Schema Questionnaire: Core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 25, 137-147.
31. Waller, G.; Ohanian, V.; Meyer, C.; & Selen, O. (2000). Cognitive content among bulimic women: The role of core beliefs. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 28, 235-241.
32. Waller, G.; Shah, R.; Ohanian, P.; & Elliott, P. (2001b). Core beliefs in bulimia nervosa and depression: The discriminant validity of Young's Schema-Questionnaire. Behavior Therapy, 32, 139-153.
33. Welburn, K.; Coristine, M.; Dagg, P.; Pontefract, A.; & Jordan, S. (2002). The Schema-Questionnaire short form: Factor analysis and relationship between schemas and symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 519-530.
34. Young, J. E. (1990). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Exchange.
35. Young, J. E. (1998). Young Schema Questionnaire short form. New York: Cognitive Therapy Center.
36. Young, J. E.; & Brown, G. (1994). Young Schema-Questionnaire (2nd Ed.). In J. E. Young (Ed.), Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (Rev. Ed.; pp. 63-76). Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
37. Young, J. E.; & Pijnaker, H. (1999). Cognitieve therapie voor persoonlijkheidsstoornissen: Een schemagerichte benadering [Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema oriented approach]. Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.