The psychometric properties of the Finnish Young Schema Questionnaire in chronic pain patients and a non-clinical sample

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 158-168

  Saariaho, Tom ^a   Saariaho, Anita ^a   Karila, Irma ^b   Joukamaa, Matti ^c,d  

^a Raahe Hospital   (Finland)

^b Institute of Psychotherapy   (Finland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TAMPERE   (Finland)

^d TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Chronic pain; Confirmatory factor analysis; Factor structure; Young Schema Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CHRONIC DISEASE; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FINLAND; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 58149215749     PISSN: 00057916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2008.07.005     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Apkarian A., Sosa Y., Sonty S., Levy R., Harden R., Parrish T., et al. Chronic back pain is associated with decreased prefrontal and thalamic gray matter density. Journal of Neuroscience 24 (2004) 10410-10415
2. Baranoff J., Oei T., Cho S., and Kwon S.-M. Factor structure and internal consistency of the Young schema questionnaire (short form) in Korean and Australian samples. Journal of Affective Disorders 93 (2006) 133-140
3. Beck A.T., Rush A.J., Shaw B.F., and Emery G. Cognitive therapy of depression (1979), Guilford Press, New York
4. Bentler P., and Bonnet D. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin 88 (1980) 588-606
5. Browne M., and Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K.A., and Long J.S. (Eds). Testing structural equation models (1993), Sage, Newbury Park, CA
6. Flora D.B., and Curran P.J. An empirical evaluation of alternative methods of estimation for confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data. Psychological Methods 9 (2004) 466-491
7. Goldberg R., Pachas W., and Keith D. Relationship between traumatic events in childhood and chronic pain. Disability and Rehabilitation 21 (1999) 23-30
8. Hu L., Bentler P., and Kano Y. Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?. Psychological Bulletin 112 (1992) 351-362
9. Jöreskog K. New developments in LISREL: analysis of ordinal variables using polychoric correlations and weighted least squares. Quality and Quantity 24 (1990) 387-404
10. Jöreskog K., and Sörbom D. Lisrel: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood (Version V) (1981), National Educational Resources, Inc.New York: SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL
11. Jöreskog K., and Sörbom D. Lisrel 7, A guide to the program and applications. 2nd ed. (1988), SPSS Inc, New York
12. Lee C., Taylor G., and Dunn J. Factor structure of the schema questionnaire in a large clinical sample. Cognitive Therapy and Research 23 (1999) 441-451
13. Lee S.-Y., Song X.-Y., Skevington S., and Hao Y.-T. Application of structural equation models to quality of life. Structural Equation Modelling 12 (2005) 435-453
14. Leskinen E. Faktorianalyysi: Konfirmatoristen faktorimallien teoria ja rakentaminen (Factor analysis: theory and building of confirmatory factor models) (1987), Jyväskylän Yliopiston Tilastotieteen Laitoksen Julkaisuja, Jyväskylä, Finland
15. Little T., Cunningham A., and Shahar G. To parcel or not to parcel: exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modelling 9 (2002) 151-173
16. Monti D., Herring C., Schwartzman R., and Marchese M. Personality assessment of patients with complex regional pain syndrome. The Clinical Journal of Pain 14 (1998) 295-302
17. Mueller R. Basic principles of structural equation modelling (1996), Springer, New York
18. Muthén B.O. A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered, categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika 49 (1984) 115-132
19. Olsson U. Maximum likelihood estimation of the polychoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika 44 (1979) 443-460
20. Quiroga, A. M. (1992). Studies of the polychoric correlation and other correlation measures for ordinal variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Acta Universitas Upsaliensis.
21. Rijkeboer M., and Bergh H. Multiple group confirmatory factor analysis of the Young schema-questionnaire in a Dutch clinical versus non-clinical population. Cognitive Therapy and Research 30 (2006) 263-278
22. Rijkeboer M., Bergh H., and Bout J. Item bias analysis of the Young schema-questionnaire for psychopathology, gender, and educational level. In: Rijkeboer M. (Ed). On the validity of the Dutch Young schema-questionnaire (2005), Printpartners Ipskamp, Enschede, Amsterdam
23. Rome H., and Rome J. Limbically augmented pain syndrome (LAPS): kindling, corticolimbic sensitization, and the convergence of affective and sensory symptoms in chronic pain disorders. Pain Medicine 1 (2000) 7-23
24. Schmidt N., Joiner T., Young J., and Telch M. The schema questionnaire: investigation of the psychometric properties and the hierarchical structure of a measure of maladaptive schemas. Cognitive Therapy and Research 19 (1995) 295-321
25. Schofferman J., Anderson D., Hines R., Smith G., and Keane G. Childhood psychological trauma and chronic refractory low-back pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain 9 (1993) 260-265
26. Segal Z., Williams J., Teasdale J., and Gemar M. A cognitive science perspective on kindling and episode sensitisation in recurrent affective disorder. Psychological Medicine 26 (1996) 371-380
27. Stallard P. Early maladaptive schemas in children: stability and differences between a community and a clinic referred sample. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy 14 (2007) 10-18
28. Waller G., Meyer C., and Ohanian V. Psychometric properties of the long and short versions of the Young schema questionnaire: core beliefs among bulimic and comparison women. Cognitive Therapy and Research 25 (2001) 137-147
29. Wang W., and Cunningham E. Comparison of alternative estimation methods in confirmatory factor analyses of the general health questionnaire. Psychological Reports 97 (2005) 3-10
30. Welburn K., Coristine M., Dagg P., Pontefract A., and Jordan S. The schema questionnaire - short form: factor analysis and relationship between schemas and symptoms. Cognitive Therapy and Research 26 (2002) 519-530
31. Young J.E. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach (1990), Professional Resource Exchange Inc, Sarasota, Fl
32. Young J.E. Young schema questionnaire short form (1998), Cognitive Therapy Center, New York
33. Young J.E. Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. 3rd ed. (1999), Professional Resource Exchange Inc, Sarasota, FL
34. Young J.E. Young schema questionnaire short form. (3rd ed.; YSQ-S3) (2005), Schema therapy institute, New York
35. Young J.E., and Brown G. Young schema questionnaire. (revised ed.). In: Young J.E. (Ed). Cognitive therapy for personality disorders: A schema-focused approach. 2nd ed. (1994), Cognitive Therapy Center, New York 63-76
36. Young J.E., and Brown G. Young schema questionnaire (2003), Cognitive Therapy Center, New York
37. Young J.E., and Klosko J. Reinventing your life (1994), Plume, New York
38. Young J.E., Klosko J., and Weishaar M.E. Schema therapy: A practitioner's guide (2003), Guilford Press, New York