Emotions, experiences and usability in real-life mobile phone use

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1061-1070

  Kujala, Sari ^a   Miron Shatz, Talya ^b  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

^b ONO ACADEMIC COLLEGE   (Israel)

Author keywords

Day reconstruction method; Emotions; Memories; Mobile phone; Usability; User experience; User satisfaction; Word of mouth

Indexed keywords

DAY RECONSTRUCTION METHOD; EMOTIONS; USABILITY; USER EXPERIENCE; USER SATISFACTION; WORD OF MOUTH;

CELLULAR TELEPHONES; DATA STORAGE EQUIPMENT; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; MOBILE PHONES;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84877955941     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2466135     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (42)

1. http://www.attrakdiff.de/en/Home/
2. Bargas-Avila, J.A. and Hornbaek, K. Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2689-2698.
3. Chitturi, R., Raghunathan, R., and Mahajan, V. Delight by design: The role of hedonic versus utilitarian benefits. Journal of Marketing 72, 3 (2008), 48-63.
4. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Larson, R. Validity and reliability of the experience sampling method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175 (1987), 526-537.
5. Finstad, K. The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 323-327.
6. Forlizzi, J. and Battarbee, K. Understanding experience in interactive systems. In Proc. DIS 2004, ACM Press (2004), 261-268.
7. Hassenzahl, M. The interplay of beauty, goodness, and usability in interactive products. Human-Computer Interaction 19, 4 (2004), 319-349.
8. Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., and Göritz, A. Needs, affect, and interactive products-Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 353-362.
9. Hassenzahl, M. and Sandweg, M. From mental effort to perceived usability: transforming experiences into summary assessments. In Proc. CHI 2004 extended abstracts, ACM Press (2004), 1283-1286.
10. Hassenzahl M. and Tractinsky, N. User experience - a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology 25, 2 (2006), 91-97.
11. Hassenzahl, M. and Ullrich, D. To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting with Computers 19, 4 (2007), 429-437.
12. Holland A. C. and Kensinger, E. A. Emotion and autobiographical memory. Physics of life reviews, 7, 1 (2010) 88-131.
13. Hornbæk, K. and Law, E. L-C. Meta-Analysis of Correlations Among Usability Measures. Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 617-626.
14. Hox, J. Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, 2002.
15. Hsee, C.K. and Hastie, R. Decision and experience: why don't we choose what makes us happy? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10, 1 (2006), 31-37.
16. Isomursu, M. Tähti, M. Väinämö, S. and Kuutti, K. Experimental evaluation of five methods for collecting emotions in field settings with mobile applications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65, 4 (2007), 404-418.
17. Jordan, P.W. Human factors for pleasure in product use. Applied Ergonomics 29, 1 (1998), 25-33.
18. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A. A. A Survey Method for Characterizing Daily Life Experience: The Day Reconstruction Method. Science 306, 5702 (2004), 1776-1780.
19. Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., Stone, A. A. The Day Reconstruction Method (DRM): Instrument documentation. Retrieved August 26, 2011, from http://harris.princeton.edu/faculty/krueger/drm-documentation- july-2004.pdf
20. Karapanos, E., Hassenzahl, M., and Martens, J.B. User experience over time. In Proc. CHI 2008 extended abstracts, (2008), 3561-3566.
21. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Martens, J. B. User experience over time: an initial framework. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 729-738.
22. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., and Martens, J. B. Measuring the dynamics of remembered experience over time. Interacting with Computers 22, 5 (2010), 328-335.
23. Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. and Sinnelä, A. Identifying hedonic factors in long-term user experience. In Proc. DPPI 2011, 137-144.
24. Kujala, S., Roto, V., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. Karapanos, E. and Sinnelä, A. UX Curve: A method for evaluating long-term user experience. Interacting with Computers 23 (2011), 473-483.
25. Law, E. L. C. Roto, V., Hassenzahl, M.,Vermeeren, A. P. O. S., and Kort, J. Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 719-728.
26. Mahlke, S. Understanding users' experience of interaction. In Proc. ECCE 2005, 251-254.
27. Mahlke, S., Thüring, M. Studying antecedents of emotional experiences in interactive contexts. In Proc. CHI 2007, ACM Press (2007), 915-918.
28. Miron-Shatz, T. Evaluating multiepisode events: Boundary conditions for the peak-end rule. Emotion 9, 2 (2009), p. 206-213.
29. Miron-Shatz, T., Stone, A. and Kahneman, D. Memories of yesterday's emotions: Does the valence of experience affect the memory-experience gap? Emotion 9, 6 (2009), 885-891.
30. Mitchell, T.R., Thompson, L., Peterson, E., Cronk, R. Temporal adjustments in the evaluation of events: The "rosy view". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 33 (1997), 421-448.
31. Norman, D. A. Memory is more important than actuality. Interactions, March + April (2009). 24-26.
32. Raita E. and A. Oulasvirta, A. Too good to be bad: Favorable product expectations boost subjective usability ratings. Interacting with Computers 23, (2011), 363-371.
33. Reichheld, F.F. The one number you need to grow. Harvard Business Review 81, 12 (2003), 46-54.
34. Robinson, M. D. and Clore, G. L. Episodic and semantic knowledge in emotional self-report: Evidence for two judgment processes. Journal of personality and social psychology 83, 1 (2002), 198-215.
35. Sanders, E.B.-N. and Dandavate, U. Design for experiencing: New tools. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Design and Emotion, Delft, (1999), 87-92.
36. Schkade, D.A. and Kahneman, D. Does living in California make people happy? A focusing illusion in judgments of life satisfaction. Psychological Science 9, 5 (1998), 340-346.
37. Stone, A.A., Shifman, S.S., & DeVries, M.W. Ecological Momentary Assessment. In D. Kahneman, E. Deiner, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Well-being: The foundations of hedonic psychology (pp.26-39). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
38. Stone, A. A., Schwarz, J. E., Broderick J. E., and Shiffman, S. S. Variability of momentary pain predicts recall of weekly pain: A consequence of the peak (or salience) memory heuristic. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 31, (2005), 1340-1346.
39. Tuch, A. N., Bargas-Avila, J. A., Opwis, K., and Wilhelm, F. H. Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 9 (2009), 703-715.
40. Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., and Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In Proc. NordiCHI 2010, ACM Press (2002), 521-530.
41. Wirtz, D., Kruger, J., Napa Scollon, C. and Diener, E. What to do on spring break? Psychological Science 14, 5, (2003), 520-524.
42. Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2004.