A 3-center comparison of 1-year mortality outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve implantation and surgical aortic valve replacement on the basis of propensity score matching among intermediate-risk surgical patients

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 6, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 443-451

  Piazza, Nicolo ^a,b   Kalesan, Bindu ^c   Van Mieghem, Nicolas ^d   Head, Stuart ^d   Wenaweser, Peter ^e   Carrel, Thierry P ^e   Bleiziffer, Sabine ^a,b   De Jaegere, Peter P ^d   Gahl, Brigitta ^e   Anderson, Robert H ^f   Kappetein, Arie Pieter ^d   Lange, Ruediger ^a,b   Serruys, Patrick W ^d   Windecker, Stephan ^e   Jüni, Peter ^c  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b ROYAL VICTORIA HOSPITAL   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^f NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

aortic stenosis; intermediate surgical risk; SAVR; surgical aortic valve replacement; SURTAVI; TAVI; transcatheter aortic valve implantation; transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SURGICAL RISK; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; EUROPE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84877951487     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: 18767605     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.01.136     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. S. Bleiziffer, H. Ruge, D. Mazzitelli Results of percutaneous and transapical transcatheter aortic valve implantation performed by a surgical team Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 35 2009 615 620 discussion 620-1
2. J. Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 2nd edition 1988 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale, New Jersey
3. P.C. Austin Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 17 2008 1202 1217
4. R. Lange, S. Bleiziffer, D. Mazzitelli Improvements in transcatheter aortic valve implantation outcomes in lower surgical risk patients: a glimpse into the future J Am Coll Cardiol 59 2012 280 287
5. C.R. Smith, M.B. Leon, M.J. Mack Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 364 2011 2187 2198
6. M. Gilard, H. Eltchaninoff, B. Iung Registry of transcatheter aortic-valve implantation in high-risk patients N Engl J Med 366 2012 1705 1715
7. E.A. Grossi, C.F. Schwartz, P.J. Yu High-risk aortic valve replacement: are the outcomes as bad as predicted? Ann Thorac Surg 85 2008 102 106 discussion 107
8. T. Walther, G. Schuler, M.A. Borger Transapical aortic valve implantation in 100 consecutive patients: comparison to propensity-matched conventional aortic valve replacement Eur Heart J 31 2010 1398 1403
9. L. Conradi, M. Seiffert, H. Treede Transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis in patients at high surgical risk J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 143 2012 64 71
10. M. Fusari, V. Bona, M. Muratori Transcatheter vs. surgical aortic valve replacement: a retrospective analysis assessing clinical effectiveness and safety J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 13 2012 229 241
11. J. Higgins, J. Ye, K.H. Humphries Early clinical outcomes after transapical aortic valve implantation: a propensity-matched comparison with conventional aortic valve replacement J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142 2011 e47 e52
12. D.M. Holzhey, W. Shi, A. Rastan, M.A. Borger, M. Hänsig, F.W. Mohr Transapical versus conventional aortic valve replacement - a propensity-matched comparison Heart Surg Forum 15 2012 E4 E8
13. R. Stöhr, G. Dohmen, R. Herpertz Thirty-day outcome after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared with surgical valve replacement in patients with high-risk aortic stenosis: a matched comparison Coron Artery Dis 22 2011 595 600
14. C. Tamburino, M. Barbanti, D. Capodanno Comparison of complications and outcomes to one year of transcatheter aortic valve implantation versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis Am J Cardiol 109 2012 1487 1493
15. M.A. Clavel, J.G. Webb, P. Pibarot Comparison of the hemodynamic performance of percutaneous and surgical bioprostheses for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 53 2009 1883 1891
16. S.K. Kodali, M.R. Williams, C.R. Smith Two-year outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic-valve replacement N Engl J Med 366 2012 1686 1695
17. M.A. Clavel, J.G. Webb, J. Rodés-Cabau Comparison between transcatheter and surgical prosthetic valve implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction Circulation 122 2010 1928 1936
18. H. Gada, S.R. Kapadia, E.M. Tuzcu, L.G. Svensson, T.H. Marwick Markov model for selection of aortic valve replacement versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation (without replacement) in high-risk patients Am J Cardiol 109 2012 1326 1333
19. S.F. Aranki, R.J. Rizzo, G.S. Couper Aortic valve replacement in the elderly Effect of gender and coronary artery disease on operative mortality Circulation 88 1993 II17 II23
20. V. Rao, W.R. Jamieson, J. Ivanov, S. Armstrong, T.E. David Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement Circulation 102 2000 III5 III9
21. B. Villari, S.E. Campbell, J. Schneider, G. Vassalli, M. Chiariello, O.M. Hess Sex-dependent differences in left ventricular function and structure in chronic pressure overload Eur Heart J 16 1995 1410 1419
22. G. Petrov, V. Regitz-Zagrosek, E. Lehmkuhl Regression of myocardial hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement: faster in women? Circulation 122 2010 S23 S28
23. K.H. Humphries, S. Toggweiler, J. Rodés-Cabau Sex differences in mortality after transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 60 2012 882 886
24. K. Hayashida, M.C. Morice, B. Chevalier Sex-related differences in clinical presentation and outcome of transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis J Am Coll Cardiol 59 2012 566 571